英语 英语 日语 日语 韩语 韩语 法语 法语 德语 德语 西班牙语 西班牙语 意大利语 意大利语 阿拉伯语 阿拉伯语 葡萄牙语 葡萄牙语 越南语 越南语 俄语 俄语 芬兰语 芬兰语 泰语 泰语 泰语 丹麦语 泰语 对外汉语

Movie science

时间:2010-06-12 01:56来源:互联网 提供网友:xiner   字体: [ ]
特别声明:本栏目内容均从网络收集或者网友提供,供仅参考试用,我们无法保证内容完整和正确。如果资料损害了您的权益,请与站长联系,我们将及时删除并致以歉意。
    (单词翻译:双击或拖选)

Movie science
Callum: Hello and welcome to 6 Minute English, I'm Callum Robertson and with me
today is William Kremer, hello William.
William: Hello Callum.
Callum: Today science in the movies. And we start with a question based on a scene
that will be familiar to many science-fiction fans. If you were in space and
there was a big explosion, what would you hear? Would the sound be:
a: louder than on Earth?
b: quieter than on Earth?
c: there be no sound at all?
William: I'm going to go for c: there's going to be no sound at all.
Callum: OK, we'll find out if you're right at the end of the programme.
Well there is science in many films, not just science-fiction films. For example
picture a scene in which there is a petrol station(加油站) and there is a pool of petrol, or
gasoline, on the ground and a character in the film takes a long suck on his
cigarette and he throws it into the pool of petrol. In the movies, what happens
William?
William: Booooom
Callum: In the movies there is a great explosion and in real life, what happens?
William: Does it just go out?
Callum: Yes it does. Apparently1 – I haven't tried this and don't try this yourself but if
you do throw a lit cigarette into a pool of gasoline, it just puts the cigarette out
and it doesn't explode.
William: Very disappointing
Callum: Well it's just one example of how the laws of physics are slightly different in
the movies. But should films be more scientifically accurate(精确的)? Sidney Perkowitz
is a scientist and author of the book Hollywood Science. He was interviewed
by the BBC on this topic and he was asked how much the science in films
should be based on fact and how much should be based on fantasy and
imagination. What's his opinion and does he think other scientists would agree
with him?
Professor Sidney Perkowitz
Ideally I think should have some of each mixed in, in good proportions(比例,大小). Not everyone would
agree with me. Some scientists would be tighter about it and say every bit of science has to be
wholly accurate. I wouldn't agree with that I think we could allow some flexibility2(弹性,适应性).
Callum: So William, what was he saying there about science fact versus3 science fantasy?
William: Well he was saying that there should be some of both – of both reality and
fantasy – mixed in good proportions, which means in balance, so not too much
one way or the other way. But he did say that not everyone would agree with
him and that some scientists would want every single bit of science to be
correct. He says that he thinks they should allow some flexibility.
Callum: Flexibility?
William: Yes, 'flexibility', meaning not being fixed4 on one idea. So being able to 'bend'
to include different ideas.
Callum: Let's listen again.
Professor Sidney Perkowitz
Ideally I think should have some of each mixed in, in good proportions. Not everyone would
agree with me. Some scientists would be tighter about it and say every bit of science has to be
wholly accurate. I wouldn't agree with that I think we could allow some flexibility.
Callum: So can less than accurate science make for a good film? Professor Perkowitz
thinks so. He mentions one particular film – what was the film about and what
was wrong with the science?
Professor Sidney Perkowitz
One example that I like is a film that in fact got quite a bit of the science wrong but the basic
premise5 was good and it started a discussion. That was the film called 'The Day after
Tomorrow' which came out, I think, 2004. It's about global warming. It hyped-up the effects,
it made things happen more dramatically and more quickly than they really would but it also
started a conversation, so that to me is a great example of a film that had enough science in it
to have some impact on real world.
Callum: So William, what was the film about and what was wrong with the science?
William: The film he mentioned was 'The Day After Tomorrow' and he said it was about
global warming. And he said that although the basic premise was right, the
basic premise – which means the main idea or the main theory – so although
that was correct, the science was wrong in that things happened more quickly
and more dramatically than would really be possible.
And he also said that the effects of climate change were 'hyped-up' which
means they were over-exaggerated, over-dramatised. However despite this he
thought it was a good film because it started a discussion on important
environmental issues.
Callum: I have to say I really like that film and I always watch it when it's on. I know
some it is absolute nonsense but still, you know, I do enjoy it. Have you ever
seen it?
William: I've never seen it, no, I'd quite like to see it now.
Callum: Let's listen to Professor Perkowitz again.
Professor Sidney Perkowitz
One example that I like is a film that in fact got quite a bit of the science wrong but the basic
premise was good and it started a discussion. That was the film called 'The Day after
Tomorrow' which came out, I think, 2004. It's about global warming. It hyped-up the effects,
it made things happen more dramatically and more quickly than they really would but it also
started a conversation, so that to me is a great example of a film that had enough science in it
to have some impact on real world.
Callum: Well that's just about all we have time for today. Before we go though, the
answer to this week's question, which was: if you were in space and there was
a big explosion, what would you hear? William you said:
William: I said c: no sound at all
Callum: You're absolutely right. Sound can't travel through a vacuum and space is a
vacuum. And on that note, it's time for us to leave you but do join us again next
time for another 6 Minute English. Goodbye.
William: Bye bye.(本文由在线英语听力室整理编辑)
 


点击收听单词发音收听单词发音  

1 apparently tMmyQ     
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎
参考例句:
  • An apparently blind alley leads suddenly into an open space.山穷水尽,豁然开朗。
  • He was apparently much surprised at the news.他对那个消息显然感到十分惊异。
2 flexibility vjPxb     
n.柔韧性,弹性,(光的)折射性,灵活性
参考例句:
  • Her great strength lies in her flexibility.她的优势在于她灵活变通。
  • The flexibility of a man's muscles will lessen as he becomes old.人老了肌肉的柔韧性将降低。
3 versus wi7wU     
prep.以…为对手,对;与…相比之下
参考例句:
  • The big match tonight is England versus Spain.今晚的大赛是英格兰对西班牙。
  • The most exciting game was Harvard versus Yale.最富紧张刺激的球赛是哈佛队对耶鲁队。
4 fixed JsKzzj     
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的
参考例句:
  • Have you two fixed on a date for the wedding yet?你们俩选定婚期了吗?
  • Once the aim is fixed,we should not change it arbitrarily.目标一旦确定,我们就不应该随意改变。
5 premise JtYyy     
n.前提;v.提论,预述
参考例句:
  • Let me premise my argument with a bit of history.让我引述一些史实作为我立论的前提。
  • We can deduce a conclusion from the premise.我们可以从这个前提推出结论。
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎点击提交分享给大家。
------分隔线----------------------------
TAG标签:   Movie  science  Movie  science
顶一下
(3)
100%
踩一下
(0)
0%
最新评论 查看所有评论
发表评论 查看所有评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
验证码:
听力搜索
推荐频道
相关文章
论坛新贴