-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Car loans in America
Bad carma
Borrowers, not lenders, have more to fear from the latest subprime lending boom
For whom?
WHAT would you rather lose: your house or your car? In America, where a car is usually essential to get to work, many borrowers would sooner lose their house, which explains why in the years after the crisis, mortgages were more likely to go bad than car loans. It also explains why auto1 loans, unlike mortgages, are booming. New loans reached 371 billion in the year to June, up 7.4% from the previous year and 64% since 2009. Subprime auto loans, made to the riskiest2 borrowers, have grown even faster, by 93% since 2009.
This growth is due to rising car sales and ample credit as banks, finance companies and carmakers' financing arms compete to lend to consumers, either directly or via car dealers4. Those loans are then packaged into securities for yield-hungry investors5. Experian, a credit-scoring agency, reckons 85% of new and 54% of used cars are now bought with loans, compared to 79% and 52% in 2007.
As volumes have soared, underwriting standards have slipped, with the average subprime loan rising to 115% of the car's value this year from 112% in 2011, according to Standard & Poor's, a ratings agency. The average life of a loan has grown too, to more than five years. Delinquencies, naturally, are rising: more than 3% of loans are at least 60 days in arrears6, up from 2% in 2011.
There is much talk of a new subprime bubble, akin7 to the cavalier mortgage lending that helped spark the financial crisis. The Department of Justice has asked two big car-loan companies, GM Financial, a unit of General Motors, and Santander Consumer, controlled by Spain's Santander Group, for details about their subprime underwriting and securitisation.
Yet the two markets are fundamentally different. Start with size. At 905 billion, total auto loans are barely a tenth of total mortgage debt. Subprime is also more established in auto lending, accounting8 for 20% to 30% of total loans since 2000.
The mortgage bubble fed on the delusion9 of both borrowers and lenders that house prices could only rise and thus a loan could always be repaid. In contrast, lenders assume cars only depreciate10, and charge accordingly: annual subprime interest rates average 14%, and 25% is not uncommon11. Cars are also easier to repossess and resell.
So while losses are likely to mount, lenders do not face a mortal threat. It is borrowers who have more reason to worry. A car loan is a complex transaction that hinges not just on the price of a car, but also on its trade-in value, extras such an extended guarantee or rust12 proofing, and most important, the interest rate. A dealer3 typically selects a quote from a bank or finance company via his computer and marks it up. The higher the markup13, the greater the payment he receives from the lender.
Consumer advocates fret14 that this process leaves the unsophisticated—as subprime customers tend to be—at the mercy of unscrupulous dealers. They may be charged a higher rate despite qualifying for a lower one, sold unneeded or overpriced extras, or even told, a few days after they drive off with the car, that their loan was turned down and they must pay a higher rate. “None of the prices are fixed15, and each unfixed price is a potentially abusive negotiating point,” says Tom Domonoske, a lawyer who represents aggrieved16 buyers. Consumer advocates would like markups replaced with a flat fee.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a new watchdog agency set up after the financial crisis, is also worried that lots of borrowers get a raw deal. It has told banks and finance companies that it holds them responsible for the behaviour of the dealers they work with, and that it considers dealers' discretion17 over markups an invitation to discrimination. It has already got one big finance firm to pay 98m to settle a claim that it was charging minority borrowers higher interest rates and is investigating others.
Dealers are fuming18 at the CFPB's muscle-flexing. Competition, they say, ensures that customers get the best rate; dealers need discretion to compete. By raising costs, stricter regulation may actually reduce the amount of credit available.
1 auto | |
n.(=automobile)(口语)汽车 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 riskiest | |
冒险的,危险的( risky的最高级 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 dealer | |
n.商人,贩子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 dealers | |
n.商人( dealer的名词复数 );贩毒者;毒品贩子;发牌者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 investors | |
n.投资者,出资者( investor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 arrears | |
n.到期未付之债,拖欠的款项;待做的工作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 akin | |
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 accounting | |
n.会计,会计学,借贷对照表 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 delusion | |
n.谬见,欺骗,幻觉,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 depreciate | |
v.降价,贬值,折旧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 uncommon | |
adj.罕见的,非凡的,不平常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 rust | |
n.锈;v.生锈;(脑子)衰退 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 markup | |
n.加价,涨价,利润 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 fret | |
v.(使)烦恼;(使)焦急;(使)腐蚀,(使)磨损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 aggrieved | |
adj.愤愤不平的,受委屈的;悲痛的;(在合法权利方面)受侵害的v.令委屈,令苦恼,侵害( aggrieve的过去式);令委屈,令苦恼,侵害( aggrieve的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 discretion | |
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 fuming | |
愤怒( fume的现在分词 ); 大怒; 发怒; 冒烟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|