-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Examining the importance of the only bridge connecting Crimea to Russia
NPR's Steve Inskeep talks to Andrew Weiss of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and NPR's Jason Beaubien about the implications of the explosion on the bridge.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Andrew Weiss, who directs research on Russia and Eurasia at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and is also the author of a forthcoming biography of Vladimir Putin called "Accidental Czar." Welcome to the program, sir.
ANDREW WEISS: Great to be here.
INSKEEP: Let's talk about the bridge that was struck over the weekend that seems to have led up to the Russian apparent retaliation2 or response on Ukrainian cities. How much does that bridge to Crimea mean to Vladimir Putin?
WEISS: Well, in practical terms, right now, it means a great deal because one of the most important pieces of Ukrainian territory that Vladimir Putin's mind has to be focused on right now is Crimea. And that bridge was both a symbolic3 gesture to connect mother Russia to Crimea, which was seized from and illegally annexed4 in 2014 from Ukraine. But right now, the Russians are in need of good military infrastructure5 and supply and logistics routes. And that bridge was a key part of the plan.
INSKEEP: And just to emphasize that this is a bridge that's used by civilians7, used by civilian6 traffic. But it sounds like it would count as a military target for that purpose.
WEISS: Well, the U.S. government, during the earlier phases of this war, had been at pains to stress that it was counseling the Ukrainians to avoid targeting Russian territory proper and to avoid attacks that could provoke a cycle of escalation8 against Ukraine. So the bridge has been important symbolic issue throughout the war. People were always wondering what, if anything, might prompt the Ukrainians to attack it. We know it was Putin's 70th birthday. And that provided an important psychological boost to the Ukrainians and to their supporters, to show that no targets are off limits. The question now is, are we in an escalatory spiral? Today's attacks on civilians across Ukraine indicates that we very much are.
INSKEEP: Well, let's follow up on that. But first, let's bring Jason Beaubien back into the conversation. He's in Kyiv. And he's got a question for you. Jason, Go.
JASON BEAUBIEN, BYLINE9: Yeah. I mean, I think one of the big questions that I keep hearing from Ukrainians is, what is it that President Putin really wants? And I wonder whether you have some insight on that.
WEISS: So that is the $64,000 question, Jason. In the first phase of this war in 2014, 2015, people were asking the same questions. The Russians have always done a lousy job of defining their strategic objectives, which, in theory, leaves them plenty of flexibility10. But it also denies people on their side a real sense of what they're fighting for. In the most recent instance, both President Putin and former president, now adviser11 Dmitry Medvedev have emphasized that they want regime change in Kyiv.
And President Putin, when he met today with his top security cabinet, basically once again labeled the government in Kyiv an international terrorist organization, effectively. And he compared Ukrainian attacks on the Kerch bridge, as well as other what he claims are terrorist attacks, as indicating that Ukraine is up there now in the ranks of major international terrorist organizations. So we're seeing the Russian government try to delegitimize the government of Ukraine. They're not going to succeed in that. But it definitely demonstrates that they still want President Zelenskyy out. And they want a structurally12 deferential13 Ukraine to replace the current government of Ukraine, which is obviously independent.
INSKEEP: I guess it also emphasizes - doesn't it? - that there's no inclination14 from Putin to negotiate or back down or retreat from Ukraine. You can't give up against an enemy that you define the way that Putin is defining Ukraine.
WEISS: No. And at no point in this war, starting in 2014, have the Russians ever negotiated in good faith. So there are calls from various Western leaders and others around the world saying, oh, let's talk to Putin. Let's find out what he wants, maybe give him something, and he'll back off. I think that's a fallacious idea.
INSKEEP: Well, let me just ask, though, about this Russian retaliation. This is deadly. It's destructive. Civilians are dead. People are living amid destruction and in fear once again in Kyiv. So I don't want to say it has no effect. And yet, on some level, does it not indicate a degree of Russian impotence that all they can do is fling missiles from a distance into cities that they thought they were going to conquer months ago? And they're getting farther away. Their troops are even farther away rather than the reverse.
WEISS: Well, it's an interesting point, Steve. Russia, at the beginning phase of this war, had used precision-guided weapons like cruise missiles to attack various targets around Ukraine. And they had launched about 2,000 of those attacks. And then, at some point, they held off. And that was because they were running short of those kinds of precision-guided munitions15. We're seeing today an indication that Russia is prepared to dip into its arsenal16 to attack what they claim are military targets. And as we see from Jason's reporting, they're not military targets. But at the same time, we need to be prepared for this war to go on for considerably17 longer than any of us would like. And for the Russians, what they have at their disposal right now is the ability to escalate18 the war either by attacking civilian infrastructure, critical infrastructure like dams or power plants, and to make life absolutely miserable19 for civilians who are in Ukraine today.
INSKEEP: Well, let's talk about further escalation. There is, of course, always the fear and the threat, the open threat by Russia, to use nuclear weapons. I want to try to think about that responsibly, if we can. What is a way to think about the risk here and how we can tell if the risk is getting greater?
WEISS: So if there's one thing the Russians are really good at, it's getting in our heads. And so when Vladimir Putin spoke20 on September 21 about mobilizing and calling up reservists, what he was doing there at the same time was a very loud set of saber-rattling and saying that all possible weapons are potentially at his disposal, including nuclear weapons. And we've seen that Western leaders, including President Biden in recent days, are quite worried about that possibility. The possibility may be low. I think he's definitely trying to get Western governments to try to put pressure on the Ukrainians to back off. And he's using this threat to intimidate21 Ukraine and its Western supporters. The scenarios22 for Russia to use nuclear weapons, though, I think, are much more tied to something related to his personal survival or the survival of the Russian government, rather than a way to kind of flip23 the script on the battlefield.
INSKEEP: Meaning that you think Putin would only use nuclear weapons if he thought the alternative was his own death?
WEISS: Or the destruction of the Russian state, yeah. I think those are the main scenarios that would require, in Putin's mind, the use of nuclear weapons. But he wants to create as much doubt and panic among Western leaders right now to put pressure for Ukraine to come to the bargaining table with him.
INSKEEP: Andrew Weiss of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Thanks very much. Really appreciate your insights.
WEISS: Thanks for having me, Steve.
INSKEEP: And we also heard from NPR's Jason Beaubien, who's in Kyiv today.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 retaliation | |
n.报复,反击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 symbolic | |
adj.象征性的,符号的,象征主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 annexed | |
[法] 附加的,附属的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 civilian | |
adj.平民的,民用的,民众的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 civilians | |
平民,百姓( civilian的名词复数 ); 老百姓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 escalation | |
n.扩大,增加 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 flexibility | |
n.柔韧性,弹性,(光的)折射性,灵活性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 structurally | |
在结构上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 deferential | |
adj. 敬意的,恭敬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 inclination | |
n.倾斜;点头;弯腰;斜坡;倾度;倾向;爱好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 munitions | |
n.军火,弹药;v.供应…军需品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 arsenal | |
n.兵工厂,军械库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 considerably | |
adv.极大地;相当大地;在很大程度上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 escalate | |
v.(使)逐步增长(或发展),(使)逐步升级 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 miserable | |
adj.悲惨的,痛苦的;可怜的,糟糕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 intimidate | |
vt.恐吓,威胁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 scenarios | |
n.[意]情节;剧本;事态;脚本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 flip | |
vt.快速翻动;轻抛;轻拍;n.轻抛;adj.轻浮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|