-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The U.K. is waiting to see who will become its third prime minister this year
NPR's Leila Fadel talks to Andrew Palmer of The Economist2, about the short tenure3 of British Prime Minister Liz Truss, and the country's political instability after Brexit.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
You've seen them - all the lettuce4 jokes out of the U.K. comparing Liz Truss' short time as prime minister to the shelf life of a head of lettuce. In the lead-up to her resignation, a livestream from the British tabloid5 newspaper The Daily Star captured the world's attention - a head of iceberg6 lettuce, wearing a blond wig7 and googly eyes, next to a photo of the embattled prime minister. The caption8 asked, will Liz Truss outlast9 the lettuce? Well, she didn't. When Truss announced her resignation just 45 days into her time in office, the lettuce celebrated10 its win with British flags and star lights, and Truss became the shortest-serving prime minister in British history.
Well, we've got the man who inspired all these lettuce jokes when he made that first comparison in the pages of The Economist. Andrew Palmer is the Britain editor at The Economist, and he joins us now. Good morning, and welcome to the program.
ANDREW PALMER: Good morning, Leila. Love to be here.
FADEL: So all lettuce jokes aside, let's talk about why Liz Truss' tenure was such a mess.
PALMER: Yes, she is now possibly the worst prime minister we have ever had. That will be a debate for historians. But really, the thing that blew her up was a big minibudget, which she unveiled along with her chancellor11 on September the 23. It was a package of unfunded tax cuts. There was no clear sense of how it would be paid for. The financial markets took fright. And ever since then, she's had to sort of systematically12 U-turn, and that shorts her authority. Over time, her ability to control her party disintegrated13. And by yesterday, it became clear that there was absolutely no point to Liz Truss, and she had to resign - so a very brief and very unsuccessful tenure.
FADEL: Is she to blame alone, though, for the financial situation? It is a time where inflation is a problem across the continent, as are rising prices.
PALMER: That's totally fair. It is difficult globally at the moment. However, what Ms. Truss and her chancellor decided14 to do...
FADEL: Yeah.
PALMER: ...Was embark15 on a borrowing spree at the point that inflation was rising. So they stuck their heads above the parapet with a really, really risky16 fiscal17 strategy and in so doing made themselves a target. So it is true that interest rates are rising everywhere. It is true that cost of living is under threat and under pressure across Europe. But they absolutely exacerbated18 it. And there is now a premium19 on British government debt, which is referred to in the markets as a moron20 premium, and that has been caused by what the British government did a few weeks ago.
FADEL: So what does this now mean for the Conservative Party, now a divided party, having to choose yet another prime minister? We're hearing the names include Boris Johnson, who had to leave in scandal, and Truss replaced him. What does it mean for the party?
PALMER: Yeah, the party is really in a kind of spiral at this point. They've been in power for 12 years. There's a sense of exhaustion21 around them. Ever since the Brexit vote in 2016, it's been riven by factionalism, and there's been a premium placed on ideological22 purity about Brexit. We are going to have had, you know, three prime ministers in the space of a matter of months very, very shortly. And it's not clear that whoever the new person is will be able to unify23 this group. It's a very, very factional, unhappy party at this point. The only thing keeping it together is, you know, a sense that to go through this again would be totally ridiculous, and the pressure from the markets. They have to come up with a credible24 fiscal plan under the new leader. And that pressure will concentrate minds.
FADEL: Do they have the public's trust, though, at this point with the chaos25, with the political and financial chaos?
PALMER: Absolutely not. That has been sacrificed. The opposition26 Labour Party has a huge lead in the polls, and if there was an election now, the Tories would be facing a landslide27 defeat. They would have a crushing, crushing loss. However, the election timetable is in their gift, and they don't have to call one until as late as January 2025. It's possible that one could happen earlier if enough Tories decide that their government is so kind of inept28 and so bad for the country that it's worth bringing on their own demise29. But at the moment, we're not quite there yet.
FADEL: So let's talk about what happens next. What is the process now to choose the next prime minister, and how likely is it actually that Boris Johnson would come back?
PALMER: Yes, the Johnson word. So we have a very accelerated timetable now. So what happens is that by Monday, candidates within the parliamentary party have to have got at least 100 nominations30 to enter the race. That's a very high bar. And what that means is that there's only a maximum of three can be in the race come Monday. It is possible that only one hits that bar, so we might know as soon as Monday who the next prime minister is. If, however, we get to two people who go head to head, then Tory party members will decide, and they must decide by the end of next week. So come what may, whether it's early or at the back end of next week, we will know who it is.
And as for who leads Britain next, Mr. Johnson is definitely in the frame. A lot of people feel that he was unfairly turfed out for various misdemeanors, dishonesty, for throwing parties during the lockdown era. They also think that he's a proven election winner and that he has a mandate31 because he was in charge of the government last time there was a general election. On the other hand, he's very, very divisive, and his chances of holding the party together are slim. So the other person to look out for is Rishi Sunak, former chancellor exchequer32, came second to Liz Truss over the summer, fiscally33 prudent34 and would probably reassure35 the markets. It's probably down to those two.
FADEL: Andrew Palmer is the Britain editor for The Economist. Thank you so much for your time.
PALMER: Thank you.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 tenure | |
n.终身职位;任期;(土地)保有权,保有期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 lettuce | |
n.莴苣;生菜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 tabloid | |
adj.轰动性的,庸俗的;n.小报,文摘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 iceberg | |
n.冰山,流冰,冷冰冰的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 wig | |
n.假发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 caption | |
n.说明,字幕,标题;v.加上标题,加上说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 outlast | |
v.较…耐久 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 chancellor | |
n.(英)大臣;法官;(德、奥)总理;大学校长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 systematically | |
adv.有系统地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 disintegrated | |
v.(使)破裂[分裂,粉碎],(使)崩溃( disintegrate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 embark | |
vi.乘船,着手,从事,上飞机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 risky | |
adj.有风险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 fiscal | |
adj.财政的,会计的,国库的,国库岁入的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 exacerbated | |
v.使恶化,使加重( exacerbate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 premium | |
n.加付款;赠品;adj.高级的;售价高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 moron | |
n.极蠢之人,低能儿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 exhaustion | |
n.耗尽枯竭,疲惫,筋疲力尽,竭尽,详尽无遗的论述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 ideological | |
a.意识形态的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 unify | |
vt.使联合,统一;使相同,使一致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 credible | |
adj.可信任的,可靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 chaos | |
n.混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 landslide | |
n.(竞选中)压倒多数的选票;一面倒的胜利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 inept | |
adj.不恰当的,荒谬的,拙劣的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 demise | |
n.死亡;v.让渡,遗赠,转让 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 nominations | |
n.提名,任命( nomination的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 mandate | |
n.托管地;命令,指示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 exchequer | |
n.财政部;国库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 fiscally | |
在国库方面,财政上,在国库岁入方面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 prudent | |
adj.谨慎的,有远见的,精打细算的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 reassure | |
v.使放心,使消除疑虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|