-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The Biden administration frees up $7 billion in Afghan assets frozen in the U.S.
Millions of Afghans are on the brink2 of starvation. NPR's Leila Fadel talks to Naser Shahalemi, founder3 of the group End Afghan Starvation, about how the U.S. is splitting up the Afghan assets.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
There are about $7 billion of Afghan funds from the country's central bank frozen in the United States. Afghanistan's economy is on the verge4 of collapse5. Inflation is soaring, and millions of Afghans are on the brink of starvation. So what's happening with that money?
On Friday, President Biden signed an executive order that would seize the Afghan assets and move half to a fund designated for humanitarian6 aid for Afghanistan. The administration nodded to legal wranglings with some 9/11 families pursuing claims against those assets as the reason for not trying to free the other half of Afghan funds for the Afghan people. And that decision - well, it sparked outrage7.
Naser Shahalemi is the founder of an Afghan advocacy organization called End Afghan Starvation. It's been fighting to free those funds. He joins me now. Good morning.
NASER SHAHALEMI: Good morning. How are you?
FADEL: I'm doing all right. How are you doing?
SHAHALEMI: We're doing wonderful. Doing wonderful.
FADEL: So, Naser, what was your reaction to this announcement last week?
SHAHALEMI: Well, initially8 there was a deep amount of shock initially as we were waiting to see what would happen with the frozen funds and what the course of action was going to be from the White House. We were dismayed. We were shocked. We were appalled9. We were in complete awe10 of what the decision was, and we hope that a better decision can come about this and this decision could get rescinded11 at some level.
FADEL: What would you say to the Biden administration, which is saying that this is its way of getting at least some of the money to Afghanistan?
SHAHALEMI: Yeah. I mean, the way that they divided this money was absolutely illogical because first we need to decipher who has the right to decide another country's national assets and federal reserve. The United States spent 20 years developing the federal reserve with Afghanistan, and then to, you know, dismantle12 it and leave it in a paralyzed state is not very copacetic for the future of Afghanistan or the economic growth of Afghanistan.
FADEL: Give us a sense of the humanitarian situation in Afghanistan right now, nearly six months since the U.S. withdrawal13.
SHAHALEMI: Yeah, the humanitarian situation is horrific at this point. The majority of the people of Afghanistan are starving, and they are locked out of their funds. They cannot access their bank cards. They cannot access their bank accounts. Many of them are in a position where - that they shouldn't need to be because they do have money in the banks.
FADEL: Yeah.
SHAHALEMI: They do have the ability to take care of themselves. But because of the sanctions, they've been locked away from their own money. And if that happened in America, people would be in outrage.
FADEL: And the sanctions you refer to are the sanctions on the Taliban, which is now in control of the country. What do you say to people who say, well, if this money goes back to Afghanistan, it will just go into the hands of the Taliban?
SHAHALEMI: It's not really how it works. Ultimately, this money that was in the federal reserve of Afghanistan's central bank was there to bolster14 the afghani note and to keep it steady. The money is - that money is hard-earned taxpayer15 Afghan money that was collected over 20 years.
FADEL: Yeah.
SHAHALEMI: And that money did not come very easy. It was designed to completely help the Afghan government and to bolster the economy. And now, to take that away, it is absolutely ridiculous because we need that money for the people of Afghanistan so they can operate and function and to operate a free enterprise and to, you know, enjoy economic growth.
FADEL: We saw demonstrations16 over the weekend condemning17 this move from the administration. What were the hopes for these funds?
SHAHALEMI: The hope for these funds was that it would be returned to the people of Afghanistan and that they would be allowed to use it for economic purposes, for business, day-to-day businesses.
FADEL: Naser Shahalemi is the founder of the End Afghan Starvation group. Thank you so much for your time.
SHAHALEMI: Thank you.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 brink | |
n.(悬崖、河流等的)边缘,边沿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 verge | |
n.边,边缘;v.接近,濒临 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 collapse | |
vi.累倒;昏倒;倒塌;塌陷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 humanitarian | |
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 outrage | |
n.暴行,侮辱,愤怒;vt.凌辱,激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 initially | |
adv.最初,开始 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 appalled | |
v.使惊骇,使充满恐惧( appall的过去式和过去分词)adj.惊骇的;丧胆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 awe | |
n.敬畏,惊惧;vt.使敬畏,使惊惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 rescinded | |
v.废除,取消( rescind的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 dismantle | |
vt.拆开,拆卸;废除,取消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 withdrawal | |
n.取回,提款;撤退,撤军;收回,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 bolster | |
n.枕垫;v.支持,鼓励 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 taxpayer | |
n.纳税人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 demonstrations | |
证明( demonstration的名词复数 ); 表明; 表达; 游行示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|