-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
There's no diplomatic path to end Russia's assault on Ukraine, Polish diplomat1 says
NPR's Leila Fadel talks to Marek Magieroweski, Poland's ambassador to the U.S., who says Russian President Putin has to suffer a decisive military defeat for the good of the region.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
Next door to Ukraine, Poland has become a key player in Russia's war. As a member of the European Union and NATO, it is a strategic center of gravity for military and humanitarian3 aid, and it has welcomed Ukrainians who have fled. Yesterday, I sat down with Poland's ambassador to the United States. Marek Magieroweski said Poland is trying to integrate about 2.7 million refugees as quickly as possible.
MAREK MAGIEROWESKI: This outpouring of solidarity4 and sympathy towards our Ukrainian brethren has been really remarkable5, and I'm so proud of my nation. On the other hand, Poland is filling up right now, so mayors of many Polish cities are now in talks with their counterparts and colleagues in Europe and beyond in order to find a solution - how to relocate those Ukrainian migrants. Of course, they are still welcome in Poland. We are ready to take in many more refugees.
FADEL: Right.
MAGIEROWESKI: For example...
FADEL: I mean, I was on the Polish border...
MAGIEROWESKI: Yeah.
FADEL: ...And I watched so many stream across the border, and it was striking to watch women and children - no men.
MAGIEROWESKI: Mostly.
FADEL: And they came in because, obviously...
MAGIEROWESKI: Ah. Yes.
FADEL: ...The men could not come out.
MAGIEROWESKI: Yeah. A few weeks ago, the Polish Parliament passed a law which essentially6 facilitates the integration7 of Ukrainian refugees into the Polish society. For example, they can apply for Polish IDs. They can set up their own businesses. They can send their children to Polish schools. By the way, about 180,000 Ukrainian children have already been incorporated into the Polish schooling8 system.
FADEL: You know, I have to ask you, though, Ambassador - when I was in Poland, it was incredible and heartwarming to watch the way Polish citizens just showed up to help strangers, but a lot of critics look at the policy when it came to Ukrainian refugees and compare it to the policies of a much smaller group of refugees - from places like Syria, from places like Afghanistan - where the Polish government decided9 to build a wall and not allow them to come in, and there was rhetoric10 like they might bring epidemics11 with them from the president.
MAGIEROWESKI: There was a distinct difference between these two migration12 crises because, in this case, when we are now facing that conflagration13 in Ukraine, Poland is the first country in which those refugees can seek asylum14, unlike, in the case of all those African and Syrian and Iraqi refugees who were trying to cross the border with Poland illegally, pushed literally15 by the Belarusian military. So it was not a migration crisis. It was an artificially created conflict. The reaction of the Polish government was absolutely correct and justifiable16.
FADEL: So what do you say to critics that want to paint it as something racial, frankly17?
MAGIEROWESKI: It was definitely not. I would like to remind you that, after the Chechen Wars in the '90s, we admitted about 60,000 refugees from Chechnya because we came to the conclusion that it was our moral obligation to help those people who were oppressed, again, by the Russian invaders18.
FADEL: Now, we've talked a lot about the humanitarian crisis, which Poland is on the front line of, but you're also on the front line of this actual war.
MAGIEROWESKI: Of the military crisis.
FADEL: Of the military crisis, exactly. And some of these strikes have been 30 miles from the Polish border. How concerned are you about a wider war engulfing19 Poland and Europe?
MAGIEROWESKI: Of course, we are pretty much concerned about this ongoing20 war. I think that we are dealing21 now with pure evil, and this has always been a very consistent stance of Poland, of the Polish authorities. We know Russia very well. We had foresight22. We have always been trying to alert the world that those near-imperial ambitions of the people who are sitting in the Kremlin are really dangerous to the rest of the world. Ukraine is not the last item on Mr. Putin's menu, but if we have more U.S. and NATO troops on Polish soil, if we have more military equipment, if we are better armed - also as NATO member - the more secure we will feel in the future.
FADEL: What does that look like? Being better armed, having more troops - I mean, what are the asks here?
MAGIEROWESKI: We have purchased F-35s. We have purchased Abrams tanks. We are arming ourselves because we know very well - we are acutely aware of the fact that, in spite of being a member of NATO, we have to be ready to defend ourselves. I don't believe in a major confrontation23 between NATO and Russia right now, and that's why we have to arm Ukraine. We have to deliver them the most sophisticated weapons.
FADEL: Should they be getting fighter jets? I mean, that was something that, over...
MAGIEROWESKI: I will explain this to you.
FADEL: ...A bunch of diplomatic missteps...
MAGIEROWESKI: Yeah.
FADEL: ...It didn't go through.
MAGIEROWESKI: There was a controversy24...
FADEL: Right.
MAGIEROWESKI: ...Also surrounding our Soviet-made aircraft. They account - those MiGs that you have just mentioned account for one-third of our fleet of combat aircraft. We can't deplete25 our fleet by one-third. It would be absolutely absurd and unacceptable in terms of our defense26 policy, and that's why we came up with that proposal to put those aircraft at the disposal of NATO. Those are not only Polish aircraft. Those are also NATO aircraft, and it should be a unanimous decision and a common effort of all NATO member countries to decide whether the Ukrainians should be supplied with these aircraft.
FADEL: So do you agree with the decision so far that these fighter jets have not gone to Ukraine?
MAGIEROWESKI: The proposal is still on the table. Again, we should move on and find the right solutions - how to arm Ukraine in the most effective manner - because I don't believe in a diplomatic solution of this conflict. I do believe in a military solution - namely, a definitive27 and total defeat of the Russian Army in Ukraine.
FADEL: But how does a military victory come about without also a diplomatic path?
MAGIEROWESKI: Believe me, that transfer of military equipment to Ukraine has been massive over the last few weeks, and they are capable - they will be capable of crushing the Russian Army. And if we talk about a hypothetical end of those hostilities28, there are some conditions that the international community should set to Russia. They should withdraw all their troops, not only from Ukraine proper, but also from those territories annexed29 and occupied since 2014 - from Crimea and from those two Eastern republics. They should pay war reparations to Ukraine. Ukraine is now devastated30. And all those war criminals who have committed unspeakable crimes in Ukraine should be tried and sentenced.
FADEL: And my last question - and you got at this a little bit, but is Poland preparing for war?
MAGIEROWESKI: We are always prepared for war. And of course, in light of this growing aggressiveness of the Russian Federation31 and President Putin himself, we need to be even better prepared. On a final note, he wants to win the Cold War - not the new Cold War. He wants to win the Cold War which ended at the beginning of the '90s.
FADEL: I guess that's why I just can't imagine a situation in which Vladimir Putin says, OK, I'll accept defeat in the way that this has gone.
MAGIEROWESKI: Maybe he will not accept defeat, but maybe his society will understand that that's enough. That's enough.
FADEL: Ambassador, a pleasure to speak with you. Thank you so much for your time.
MAGIEROWESKI: Thank you very much.
FADEL: Marek Magieroweski is Poland's ambassador to the United States.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
1 diplomat | |
n.外交官,外交家;能交际的人,圆滑的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 humanitarian | |
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 solidarity | |
n.团结;休戚相关 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 integration | |
n.一体化,联合,结合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 schooling | |
n.教育;正规学校教育 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 epidemics | |
n.流行病 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 migration | |
n.迁移,移居,(鸟类等的)迁徙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 conflagration | |
n.建筑物或森林大火 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 asylum | |
n.避难所,庇护所,避难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 justifiable | |
adj.有理由的,无可非议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 invaders | |
入侵者,侵略者,侵入物( invader的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 engulfing | |
adj.吞噬的v.吞没,包住( engulf的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 foresight | |
n.先见之明,深谋远虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 confrontation | |
n.对抗,对峙,冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 deplete | |
v.弄空,排除,减轻,减少...体液,放去...的血 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 definitive | |
adj.确切的,权威性的;最后的,决定性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 hostilities | |
n.战争;敌意(hostility的复数);敌对状态;战事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 annexed | |
[法] 附加的,附属的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 devastated | |
v.彻底破坏( devastate的过去式和过去分词);摧毁;毁灭;在感情上(精神上、财务上等)压垮adj.毁坏的;极为震惊的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 federation | |
n.同盟,联邦,联合,联盟,联合会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|