-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Jan. 6 panel must invite Trump1 to testify, committee member Rep. Lofgren says
The House investigation3 of the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol is in its final stages. NPR's A Martinez talks to Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a member of the Jan. 6 panel, about what's next.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
The House investigation of the 2021 attack on the Capitol is in its final stages. The question is, what's next for the January 6 committee? Democratic Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren of California is a committee member. And she says, they are in a tricky4 position.
ZOE LOFGREN: We're a legislative5 committee. We're not a prosecutorial6 body.
FADEL: Over the last few days, reports emerged of a split inside the committee over whether to make a criminal referral for former President Donald Trump. But Lofgren told our co-host, A Martinez, they are not divided.
LOFGREN: Well, first, those reports are incorrect. The committee has never even had a discussion of this. And the press is spinning around, and commentators7, that somehow there's some division, we've never had a discussion.
A MARTINEZ, HOST:
Not even informally?
LOFGREN: Now, I did point out that there is no legal import. Essentially8, a criminal - so-called criminal referral is the committee sends a letter, right? And it doesn't have any legal impact. That doesn't mean we wouldn't do it and we haven't had a discussion of it. We've accomplished9 a great deal, but we're not quite done. And we expect and plan to have public hearings in the very near future to lay out what we've discovered not only about what happened on January 6 but the elements of the plot leading up to January 6.
MARTINEZ: Are you planning on having those discussions at some point very soon?
LOFGREN: Well, at some point, we very well may. But the real issue, I think, is to make sure that the American public. And that would include the Department of Justice, has the evidence (laughter) that we have compiled.
MARTINEZ: The public hearings, what's the timeline for that?
LOFGREN: Well, we haven't set a date yet, so I'm not going to leap ahead of the chairman's announcement. But we think quite soon - this spring for sure.
MARTINEZ: How likely do you think it is that the committee will ask former President Donald Trump to testify?
LOFGREN: That is something we haven't finalized10. So we're looking very seriously at that. Obviously, he's a central figure in this. I am mindful, however, that his track record of truthfulness11 is a bit squishy. So to finish this without inviting12 him in, I think, would be a mistake, personally. So again, no final decision has been made on that.
MARTINEZ: But it sounds like you would like him to testify.
LOFGREN: Well, I think we have to - I personally believe that we have to invite him in. It's important to note that members of his close circle have come in. Both his daughter and son-in-law came in for long interviews. But there are many others who were in the inner circle. Just take, for example, you make a phone call - Person A makes a phone call. Well, if you haven't talked to Person A, there are people in the office sitting around that person who overheard their end of the conversation. And it - and he made a call to Person B. There's people sitting around Person B who heard it. So you can piece together quite a bit of information, which we're attempting to do.
MARTINEZ: Would that be a reason to ask former Vice13 President Mike Pence to testify?
LOFGREN: Well, again, we have not made a decision on that. But I will say that we have received very substantial information about the vice president's activities from a whole variety of witnesses, as well as documentary evidence.
MARTINEZ: If the committee were to ask Donald Trump to testify and he declines, would there be something missing? Would there be something lacking in that final report without his testimony14?
LOFGREN: Well, you know, again, it's hard to know without knowing what he would say. I am aware that some of the press, I think, including NPR, did analysis of how often he lied.
MARTINEZ: But even if he were to lie, you'd want that on the record, though, wouldn't you?
LOFGREN: Well, as I say, we've not made a final decision. I personally believe we should invite him in. That's just my view. The committee has not yet made a decision on that.
MARTINEZ: Congresswoman, how does this committee's work compare with your previous work as an impeachment15 manager three times over, wondering what you've seen as - or felt some of the similarities and differences have been?
LOFGREN: This is the most wide-ranging, in-depth investigation I've ever been involved in.
MARTINEZ: More than the impeachment?
LOFGREN: Yes.
MARTINEZ: In what way? How has it gone?
LOFGREN: I mean, we have interviewed more than 800 people. We have more than 100,000 documents. It's an intense, wide, professional investigation. And it's yielded a very broad picture of the plot that led up to the January 6 events. We're not quite done. But we have uncovered quite a bit of information.
MARTINEZ: What do you hope the results of the investigation will do for the way Americans look back on what happened on January 6, 2021?
LOFGREN: Well, I hope that by presenting the facts that we've uncovered, people will understand it wasn't just some random16 day. It was a bad day for America, where, you know, there was violence. Hundreds of people were injured. People died. People broke into the Capitol. It didn't happen in isolation17. It was the product of quite an extensive plot to upend the Constitution and to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. So I hope that by the time we've presented our entire report, people will have a renewed passion for our Constitution, for our rule of law, and understand that the system of democratic transition of power is not just, you know, ours by right. We have to defend that with thoughtful rhetoric18 and adherence19 to the rule of law. I hope that that passion for America is renewed a little bit with this report.
MARTINEZ: That is California Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren. Congresswoman, thank you very much.
LOFGREN: You bet.
FADEL: She spoke20 to our co-host, A Martinez.
(SOUNDBITE OF ANDREW GIALANELLA'S "WHAT IT MEANS")
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 tricky | |
adj.狡猾的,奸诈的;(工作等)棘手的,微妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 prosecutorial | |
公诉人的,原告的; 起诉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 commentators | |
n.评论员( commentator的名词复数 );时事评论员;注释者;实况广播员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 finalized | |
vt.完成(finalize的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 truthfulness | |
n. 符合实际 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 inviting | |
adj.诱人的,引人注目的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 impeachment | |
n.弹劾;控告;怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 random | |
adj.随机的;任意的;n.偶然的(或随便的)行动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 isolation | |
n.隔离,孤立,分解,分离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 adherence | |
n.信奉,依附,坚持,固着 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|