-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A mental health bill in Georgia shows how conspiracy1 theories are affecting politics
On its surface, there wasn't supposed to be anything controversial about Georgia's Mental Health Parity3 Act introduced earlier this year.
In a time where Democrats4 and Republicans don't agree on much, the issue of mental health reform was top of mind when Georgia lawmakers crafted a bill that had the backing of experts, advocates and both political parties. Both Republican Gov. Brian Kemp and his likely Democratic challenger in the fall, Stacey Abrams, backed the bill.
"Now I'm going to give Republicans credit," Abrams said at a campaign stop in March. "This is a conversation we've been trying to have in Georgia for more than a decade."
After years of ranking near the bottom in access to mental health care, Georgia's House Bill 1013 would require insurance companies to cover mental health the same way they do physical health. Only three lawmakers voted against the original bill in the state House, citing concerns over inclusion of language already used to define existing issues and provide care.
But before the bill could advance further, its opponents connected the legislation to hot-button cultural issues, especially around sexual identity, and nearly derailed it. The fact that Democrats also supported the bill raised suspicion among some Republicans.
Rep. Philip Singleton, a leader of the legislature's far-right state Freedom Caucus5, claimed the bill would "massively expand government in the style of ObamaCare," and enable "back door gun-grabbing."
Then he went even further in a speech before the Georgia state House. "Under this language, treatment for things such as gender6 dysphoria and pedophilia are automatically included and would therefore be required to be covered, the cost of which will be spread out amongst all Georgians," he said.
From there, opposition7 snowballed. A nonprofit called "Truth in Education" put out a flyer falsely alleging8 that Georgia was set to use the law to take guns away from citizens and that pedophilia would no longer be illegal, but rather a health diagnosis9. Dozens of mostly older citizens flooded committee hearings with signs attacking Abrams and decrying10 things that the bill didn't even do.
And at a recent Trump11 rally, Patrick Witt, a fringe candidate for insurance commissioner12, elicited13 boos when he made the false claim the government would take over mental health care, guided by the World Health Organization.
"It is the biggest government takeover of health care since Obamacare, and it's being pushed by your Republican insurance commissioner," he said. "It would mandate14 that insurance companies cover any mental health treatment as defined by the World Health Organization – which no surprise will include gender reassignment surgery, hormone15 blockers for kids and potentially even therapy for pedophiles."
The original language of the bill defined "mental health or substance use disorder16" as a condition included in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical17 Manual of Mental Disorders18 - also known as DSM-5, or the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases. Ultimately, lawmakers tweaked language to appease19 the critics without substantially altering the bill's purpose. But some lawmakers were still concerned the measure was straying from its stated goal. "I just wonder if this weakens the original intent of the parity section of the bill," Democratic state Sen. Michelle Au, an anesthesiologist, said during a hearing.
The episode in Georgia is another sign of how disinformation's grasp on American politics is becoming stronger. Right-wing figures have lately started to use the term "groomers," to apply to opponents of their agenda rolling back LGBTQ rights, such as Florida's new law limiting discussion on sexual orientation20 and gender identity in classrooms.
"Groomer" is a term that implies child sexual abuse and has a history steeped in homophobia. There is no evidence that LGBTQ people abuse children at any greater rate than the rest of the population.
Increasingly, outspoken21 Republican members of Congress, like Georgia's Marjorie Taylor Greene, are also adopting these slurs22. "The Democrats are the party of pedophiles," Greene said in a recent interview on a fringe media outlet23. "The Democrats are the party of princess predators24 from Disney."
None of these things are true. But Jennifer Mercieca, an expert in political rhetoric25 who teaches at Texas A&M University, said that's beside the point, because messaging like this evokes26 feelings of fear instead of facts.
"There's a lot of research about fear appeals and why they work on the brain," she said. "And here you have a fear appeal, an outrage27 appeal and a conspiracy theory all wrapped into one."
Name-calling in politics is nothing new - but using such harsh, absolutist language is meant to deliberately28 whip voters into a frenzy29. And in political debates, that leads to more extreme positions and less compromise.
That kind of language is "used to dehumanize people," Mercieca said. "They're no longer people, but they are instead 'pedophiles' or 'groomers.' They're not even human. You, of course, don't try to negotiate or find consensus30 with an enemy who cheats. That's not the goal, the goal is only to destroy them."
Ultimately the tactics didn't work in Georgia – this time.
Gov. Brian Kemp signed the Mental Health Parity Act into law on April 4th flanked by Republicans and Democrats, advocates and activists31 with much fanfare32 – after the final bill passed with unanimous support.
1 conspiracy | |
n.阴谋,密谋,共谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 parity | |
n.平价,等价,比价,对等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 caucus | |
n.秘密会议;干部会议;v.(参加)干部开会议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 gender | |
n.(生理上的)性,(名词、代词等的)性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 alleging | |
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 diagnosis | |
n.诊断,诊断结果,调查分析,判断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 decrying | |
v.公开反对,谴责( decry的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 commissioner | |
n.(政府厅、局、处等部门)专员,长官,委员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 elicited | |
引出,探出( elicit的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 mandate | |
n.托管地;命令,指示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 hormone | |
n.荷尔蒙,激素,内分泌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 statistical | |
adj.统计的,统计学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 disorders | |
n.混乱( disorder的名词复数 );凌乱;骚乱;(身心、机能)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 appease | |
v.安抚,缓和,平息,满足 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 orientation | |
n.方向,目标;熟悉,适应,情况介绍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 outspoken | |
adj.直言无讳的,坦率的,坦白无隐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 slurs | |
含糊的发音( slur的名词复数 ); 玷污; 连奏线; 连唱线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 outlet | |
n.出口/路;销路;批发商店;通风口;发泄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 predators | |
n.食肉动物( predator的名词复数 );奴役他人者(尤指在财务或性关系方面) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 evokes | |
产生,引起,唤起( evoke的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 outrage | |
n.暴行,侮辱,愤怒;vt.凌辱,激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 frenzy | |
n.疯狂,狂热,极度的激动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 activists | |
n.(政治活动的)积极分子,活动家( activist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 fanfare | |
n.喇叭;号角之声;v.热闹地宣布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|