-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Biden's launch of a trade pact1 is overshadowed by a Taiwan-China question
Biden was launching a trade pact in Tokyo with countries from the Indo-Pacific region. It was overshadowed by his response to a question about whether the U.S. would defend Taiwan if China invaded.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
Today President Biden answered a question the U.S. normally avoids answering. The question - whether the U.S. would defend Taiwan. A reporter asked if the U.S. would get involved militarily if mainland China invades. Biden said, yes. That would be a big policy change. Though Biden also said U.S. policy has not changed. He also warned China against trying to take the self-governed area which China claims.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: They're already flirting3 with danger right now by flying so close and all the maneuvers4 that are undertaken. But the United States is committed. We've made a commitment. We support the "One China" policy. We support all that we've done in the past. But that does not mean - it does not mean that China has the ability, has the - excuse me - the jurisdiction5 to go in and use force to take over Taiwan.
FADEL: NPR's Asma Khalid is traveling with Biden on his first official trip to Asia as president. I asked her whether the president has changed his stance.
ASMA KHALID, BYLINE6: Officially, no. The president himself publicly said there is no change in U.S. policy. The thing is that, for decades, U.S. policy has been one of strategic ambiguity7. Presidents have been particularly careful to not explicitly8 say that the U.S. would militarily get involved in Taiwan out of concerns that that might escalate9 tensions with China. But at a news conference, Biden was explicitly asked that, given he did not want to get involved in Ukraine militarily, would he get involved militarily in Taiwan? And the president unequivocally said yes.
FADEL: Yeah.
KHALID: You know, the reaction from Beijing, as expected, was swift. China's foreign minister said that it deplored10 Biden's comments and said the U.S. should not defend Taiwan's independence. The White House tried to walk this back quickly. An official sent me a text message saying that nothing about U.S. foreign policy here has changed. Though I will say, Leila, this all definitely took attention away from what the White House wanted to focus on today, which was this new trade pact.
FADEL: So let's talk about that trade pact. What's it all about?
KHALID: It's called the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, and it's really about competition with China. You know, it's not a traditional free trade agreement with incentives11 to lower tariffs12. Biden officials say that this is by design. They realized there was not political appetite in the country for something like the Trans-Pacific Partnership13, which you probably recall was this cornerstone of the Obama economic strategy in the region. But environmental and labor14 groups opposed it, and President Obama could not get that deal through Congress.
FADEL: Right.
KHALID: So this new pact is about setting standards, common rules of the road - sort of, you know, around key issues that do include trade, but also things like infrastructure15, supply chains, clean energy and taxes.
FADEL: So who's signed on to this deal? How will it work?
KHALID: There are 13 countries, including the U.S., that are signing up. You know, it includes a range of countries, from large economies like Japan and Australia to emerging markets like Thailand and Vietnam. I will say that what exactly all these countries are signing up for is unclear. There are no binding16 commitments yet. And, you know, essentially17, this is a pact to cooperate. I will say, one major challenge for Biden is to prove that this deal is more than a framework. And some allies in the region certainly want more. In fact, earlier today, as President Biden stood next to Japan's prime minister, Japan's prime minister publicly said that he hopes the U.S. comes back to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, though that is not necessarily likely to happen in the foreseeable future.
FADEL: NPR's Asma Khalid, thank you so much for your reporting.
KHALID: Good talking to you.
1 pact | |
n.合同,条约,公约,协定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 flirting | |
v.调情,打情骂俏( flirt的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 maneuvers | |
n.策略,谋略,花招( maneuver的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 jurisdiction | |
n.司法权,审判权,管辖权,控制权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 ambiguity | |
n.模棱两可;意义不明确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 explicitly | |
ad.明确地,显然地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 escalate | |
v.(使)逐步增长(或发展),(使)逐步升级 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 deplored | |
v.悲叹,痛惜,强烈反对( deplore的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 incentives | |
激励某人做某事的事物( incentive的名词复数 ); 刺激; 诱因; 动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 tariffs | |
关税制度; 关税( tariff的名词复数 ); 关税表; (旅馆或饭店等的)收费表; 量刑标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 binding | |
有约束力的,有效的,应遵守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|