-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
FDA seems poised1 to approve a new drug for ALS, but does it work?
The Food and Drug Administration is likely to approve a controversial new drug for ALS by the end of the month.
But it's still not clear whether the drug, called AMX0035, truly helps people with ALS, a rare and fatal neurological disorder3 that eventually leaves a person unable to walk, talk, swallow and breathe.
In March, the FDA's Peripheral4 and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory5 Committee concluded that a study of 137 ALS patients did not provide "substantial evidence" that AMX0035 was effective.
Then in September, after prodding6 from FDA officials and an email campaign by patients and their families, the same committee reconvened, and this time recommended approving the drug.
The FDA, which usually follows advisory committee recommendations, has indicated it will make a decision by Sept. 29.
An approval is more likely now that it would have been decades ago, says Holly7 Fernandez Lynch, an assistant professor of medical ethics8 and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania.
"The trajectory9 at FDA has been increased willingness to accept weaker evidence," she says.
Two old products, one new drug
AMX0035 is a combination of two existing products. One is a dietary supplement called taurursodiol, which can be purchased online.The other is a prescription10 drug called sodium11 phenylbutyrate, which is used to treat a rare type of metabolic12 disorder.
The combination is meant to slow down ALS, which gradually destroys cells in the brain and spinal13 cord that control voluntary muscle movement.
AMX0035 was developed by Amylyx— a company based in Cambridge, Mass. that was founded in 2013 by two graduates of Brown University.
Amylyx sought FDA approval of its drug based on a single study of 137 patients with ALS. The results suggested that AMX0035 could extend patients' lives by several months.
But at a public meeting in March, most experts on the FDA's advisory committee said they were unconvinced by the study, called Centaur14.
"There are many features of Centaur that limit its persuasiveness," said Dr. G. Caleb Alexander, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University.
"The applicant15 hasn't provided robust16 evidence," said Dr. Bryan Traynor, a neurologist at the National Institute on Aging.
"The data isn't as strong as we would hope," said Dr. Liana Apostolova, an Alzheimer's expert at Indiana University.
The study was "problematic," said Dr. Kenneth H. Fischbeck, a neurogenetics researcher at the National Institutes of Health.
It "did not meet the threshold," said Dr. Thomas J. Montine, a pathologist at Stanford University.
"This study, on its own, doesn't establish that this drug is effective in the treatment of ALS," said Dr. Robert C. Alexander, chief scientific officer of the Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative, led by the Banner Alzheimer's Institute.
All six of those committee members voted no, when asked whether the evidence showed the drug was effective. Four other committee members voted yes.
Typically, that kind of response would have been the end of it, at least until Amylyx was ready to present data from a much larger study, which is already underway.
But after the March meeting, ALS patients and family members took to the Internet.
"There were thousands of emails that went to the [FDA] commissioner's office," says Neil Thakur, chief mission officer at the ALS Association, which helped fund the Amylyx study. "There were over 1,100 comments that went to the advisory committee themselves, and also there was a sustained effort from ALS clinical scientific leaders."
The small clinical trial does have flaws, Thakur said, but the advisory committee should have been willing to overlook those when it first reviewed the evidence in the spring.
"They were asking to hold that drug to the same standard they would hold any drug for any disease that wasn't fatal and had lots of effective treatments," he says.
Sponsor Message
Right now, ALS patients are offered variants18 of just two drugs: edaravone and riluzole. And even with these drug treatments, they typically die within two to five years after a diagnosis19.
From no to yes
The email campaign by ALS patients seemed to have an effect on some FDA officials.
Early this month, the agency took the unusual step of reconvening its advisory committee to reconsider the Amylyx drug. And this time, the FDA encouraged committee members to take a different perspective, Thakur says.
"This committee, it was clear that they were being asked to make a decision taking into account the available treatments and the needs of the ALS community," he says.
The committee also received some additional data on patients in the Amylyx study, and data from a study of Alzheimer's patients who took AMX0035.
When the committee held its second public meeting on the drug, they were offered guidance from Dr. Billy Dunn, who directs the FDA's Office of Neuroscience. He urged them to consider the plight20 of patients with ALS, and suggested his agency was open to approving the drug.
"For these serious diseases, like ALS and so many other neurological diseases, the maximum degree of regulatory flexibility21 is operational," he said.
The FDA even revised its question to the committee. Instead of asking whether the drug was effective, they asked simply whether it should be approved.
After listening — instead of six no votes, seven of nine committee members decided22 to vote yes.
Echos of Aduhelm?
The process leading to the yes vote was "fishy," says Fernandez Lynch, the bioethicist at UPenn.
"The very cynical23 version of this is that there was some kind of goal of manipulating the advisory committee to vote in a different way," she says.
"They were swayed by this concern that they might be making the wrong judgment24 if they recommended FDA not to approve this product," she says. "But nobody, as far as I heard, said this drug meets the substantial evidence standard."
The substantial evidence standard was also in question when the FDA was considering the controversial Alzheimer's drug Aduhelm. The FDA approved that drug last year despite an overwhelming vote from the advisory committee that the standard had not been met.
If AMX0035 is approved, that could send troubling message to pharmaceutical25 companies, Lynch says.
"The message to companies is that you don't have to show that your drug works," she says. "You have to do the bare minimum to show that it might work."
1 poised | |
a.摆好姿势不动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 peripheral | |
adj.周边的,外围的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 advisory | |
adj.劝告的,忠告的,顾问的,提供咨询 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 prodding | |
v.刺,戳( prod的现在分词 );刺激;促使;(用手指或尖物)戳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 holly | |
n.[植]冬青属灌木 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 trajectory | |
n.弹道,轨道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 prescription | |
n.处方,开药;指示,规定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 sodium | |
n.(化)钠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 metabolic | |
adj.新陈代谢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 spinal | |
adj.针的,尖刺的,尖刺状突起的;adj.脊骨的,脊髓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 centaur | |
n.人首马身的怪物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 applicant | |
n.申请人,求职者,请求者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 robust | |
adj.强壮的,强健的,粗野的,需要体力的,浓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 advisors | |
n.顾问,劝告者( advisor的名词复数 );(指导大学新生学科问题等的)指导教授 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 variants | |
n.变体( variant的名词复数 );变种;变型;(词等的)变体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 diagnosis | |
n.诊断,诊断结果,调查分析,判断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 plight | |
n.困境,境况,誓约,艰难;vt.宣誓,保证,约定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 flexibility | |
n.柔韧性,弹性,(光的)折射性,灵活性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 cynical | |
adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的,不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 pharmaceutical | |
adj.药学的,药物的;药用的,药剂师的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|