-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Floating objects raise questions about surveillance, national defense1 and diplomacy2
NPR's Asma Khalid talks to David Gompert, a longtime presidential adviser4, about the unidentified objects that have been floating in the sky. U.S. jets shot down three of them in the past three days.
ASMA KHALID, HOST:
All these unidentified objects floating up in the sky are bringing up fresh questions about global surveillance, national defense and diplomacy. We've called up David Gompert, a longtime presidential adviser in all of those areas. He has served five administrations, from Reagan all the way through Obama. He was acting5 director of national intelligence in the Obama administration, and he's now a visiting professor at the U.S. Naval6 Academy.
Good morning, sir. It's good to have you with us.
DAVID GOMPERT: Good morning, Asma.
KHALID: So that suspected Chinese spy balloon, the one that was shot down on Feb. 4 - it led Secretary of State Antony Blinken to put off his planned diplomatic trip to China. And one of the goals of that trip was improving basic communications between the two countries. So I want to understand what is missing right now in the way that the United States and China are speaking with one another.
GOMPERT: What is missing is dialogue. The U.S.-China strategic nuclear relationship, which is stable because of mutual7 deterrence8, but it is fraught9 with suspicion. If the Chinese weren't suspicious, they weren't - wouldn't be sending a spy balloon over the United States. If we weren't suspicious, we wouldn't be so worked up about the implications of the Chinese spy balloon activities. And that level of suspicion is very troublesome and potentially dangerous. What we need is not simply a hotline. We need a dialogue.
KHALID: A dialogue. You know, you mentioned a hotline, though, there. And I want to ask you a follow-up on that. There were reports that when this first Chinese spy balloon was spotted10, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin tried to contact his Chinese counterpart by means of a special crisis line. He was not able to get through with success. And I wanted to understand - I mean, are both countries - do you feel that the United States and China are receptive to this kind of direct communication between top officials in moments of crisis?
GOMPERT: The short answer is no. Let me explain, if I might, Asma, what this operation by the Chinese is and what it's not. It's criminal. One can fly satellites any time for virtually any purpose as long as they're in space. But in the atmosphere, flying in another country's airspace is a crime. So we had crimes committed against us by the Chinese, and we are right to be outraged11. Secondly12, it's a political blunder, as far as I can see, because the Chinese should have known that at least the balloon, if not other objects, would be detected and neutralized13. And that's exactly what has happened. So it's an embarrassment14 to the Chinese.
Why are the Chinese doing this? It's not because there's an opportunity for China to take a huge leap forward in strategic surveillance and to surpass the United States. It's quite the opposite. This reflects the fact that the Chinese are way behind the United States in strategic surveillance, and they're trying to catch up by whatever means they can, including surveillance balloons.
KHALID: You had mentioned earlier, though, this need to build dialogue, to have constructive15 dialogue.
GOMPERT: Yes.
KHALID: And if, you know, hotlines are not working in moments of crisis, then you sort of have to go back and say, well, how do you have these - how do you reestablish trust? And right now when you look at the relations between the United States and China, they are already strained. What are some of the roadblocks to establishing trust? How can that happen?
GOMPERT: Well, I'm not talking about a hotline. That, of course, is very important in moments of crisis. I'm talking about an ongoing16 dialogue about purpose. Each power assigns nuclear weapons, why it has nuclear weapons, why it has the nuclear weapons it has in order to clarify, eliminate, or at least alleviate17 misconceptions, address suspicions and, I believe, improve stability and security at the nuclear strategic level that way. That's a dialogue. That's a process.
KHALID: And how do you build that dialogue?
GOMPERT: Well, I think this is an opportunity. A lot of U.S. talking heads are saying we should be outraged and we should have no communications with the Chinese about this; we should retaliate18 in some way. I think we should do the opposite. We should insist that the Chinese join the United States in a deep and continuing conversation about the purpose of nuclear weapons so we can clear up misconceptions and suspicions which could lead to instability and even conflict.
KHALID: Thank you very much for taking the time.
GOMPERT: You're quite welcome.
KHALID: David Gompert is a visiting professor at the U.S. Naval Academy and a longtime national security expert.
1 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 diplomacy | |
n.外交;外交手腕,交际手腕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 naval | |
adj.海军的,军舰的,船的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 deterrence | |
威慑,制止; 制止物,制止因素; 挽留的事物; 核威慑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fraught | |
adj.充满…的,伴有(危险等)的;忧虑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 spotted | |
adj.有斑点的,斑纹的,弄污了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 outraged | |
a.震惊的,义愤填膺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 secondly | |
adv.第二,其次 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 neutralized | |
v.使失效( neutralize的过去式和过去分词 );抵消;中和;使(一个国家)中立化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 embarrassment | |
n.尴尬;使人为难的人(事物);障碍;窘迫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 constructive | |
adj.建设的,建设性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 alleviate | |
v.减轻,缓和,缓解(痛苦等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 retaliate | |
v.报复,反击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|