-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Sen. Bernie Sanders is embracing his anger. A new book details what he's angry about
Senator Bernie Sanders is embracing his anger.
He's shown a lot of it during three decades in Congress. In 1992, he attacked both parties for defense2 spending, claiming they were "hoping and praying that maybe we'll have another war."
During his first presidential run, he spoke3 sarcastically4 of people who fear his identification as a socialist5. "I don't want to get people nervous falling off their chairs, but Social Security is a socialist program," Sanders told NPR in 2015.
It's no surprise that the Vermont senator spoke harshly of President Donald Trump6, vowing7: "You're damn right we're going to hold him accountable" at the time.
But he also bristled8 when social justice activists9 insisted that Democrats10 use the phrase "Black Lives Matter."
"It's too easy for 'liberals,' to be saying, well, let's use this phrase. What are we going to do about 51 percent of young African Americans unemployed11?" Sanders said.
The Senator is preoccupied12 with America's economic divides; and his new book about his recent campaigns and legislation is titled It's Okay to be Angry About Capitalism13.
"They say the older you get, the more conservative you become," he writes. "That's not me. The older I get, the angrier I become about the uber-capitalist system."
He says his anger grows in part out of his youth in a struggling family in Brooklyn in the 1940s and 1950s. He dedicates the book, in part, to his older brother Larry, who introduced him to authors ranging from psychoanalysis founder14 Sigmund Freud to political theorist Karl Marx, who, along with Friedrich Engels, established the far-left ideology15 known as Marxism.
"We didn't have a lot of books in the house, and my brother brought books into the house and talked with me about politics, talked to me about history, talked to me about psychology," Sanders told NPR.
"And kind of intellectually opened up my eyes to the world that we're living in."
Today Larry Sanders is a Green Party politician in the United Kingdom.
And Bernie Sanders, after two presidential campaigns, now chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor16, and Pensions Committee. For all his anger and demands for systemic change, the senator told NPR he is working within a divided Congress to make more modest changes that he thinks are possible.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
I was bitterly disappointed [at the failure of giant social legislation known as] Build Back Better... What many of us said is... Let's deal with the structural17 crises facing America. Our child care system is a disaster. Our healthcare system is dysfunctional. Kids can't afford to go to college. Let's deal with the existential threat of climate change. Let's deal with income and wealth inequality. We came within two votes of bringing forth18 legislation which would have been transformative for the working families.
SI: Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, who would be described as more moderate or more conservative, and represent more conservative states–
Corporate19 Democrats would be the term.
SI: Corporate Democrats?
These are folks who've got a whole lot of money from wealthy people and large corporations and they do their bidding.
SI: I was going to ask if you're still angry at someone like Joe Manchin. It sounds like you are. From his perspective, he's representing a very conservative state that votes for Republicans for president hugely and needs to bring them something that they can believe in. Do you sympathize with his political situation?
In 2016 when I was running for president, I won a landslide20 victory in West Virginia.
SI: In the Democratic primary.
In the Democratic primary.
SI: But there's a general election.
I understand... In my view, politicians do well when they stand up and fight for working people.
On the power of the working-class vote
SI: You write about the working class: "You can't win elections without the overwhelming support of the working class." It seems that many Republicans now agree with you and openly court the working class and get a lot of working class votes. Why do you think that is?
Well, that is an enormously important political issue. That is the most important political question of our time. [It's] not that working class people agree with Republican views... But what I think has happened over the years, and this is no great secret as a result of a lot of corporate contributions, the Democratic Party has kind of turned its back on the needs of working class people. And then you have a gap there where you have people like Trump coming along and say, "You know what the problem is? It's immigrants, it's gays, it's transgender people." And you get people angry around those issues rather than Democrats saying, I'll tell you what the problem is. The problem is the wealthy are getting richer. Corporations have enormous power. We're going to take them on to create a nation that works for you.
On what Sanders thinks he can accomplish in a divided Congress
What I want to see, a Medicare-for-all system, ain't going to happen. No Republicans support it. Half the Democrats won't support it. But this is what we can do: We can expand primary health care and community health centers to every region of the country...We now have 30 million people accessing community health centers [and can do more]... You walk into a community health center, you get affordable21 health care, dental care... mental health counseling and low cost prescription22 drugs. Republicans understand that in red states it is very hard often for people to access a doctor.
On his pragmatism
SI: Even though you say it's okay to be angry about capitalism, there's a place for capitalism in the world as you envision it.
Yes, there is. Yes, there is.
SI: If you made all the rules, there would still be large corporations.
Well, I don't know about that. But look, there's nothing in that book to suggest that it is bad for people to go out and start a business, to come up with innovation. That's great. That's good. What is bad is when a handful of corporations control sector23 after sector.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 sarcastically | |
adv.挖苦地,讽刺地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 socialist | |
n.社会主义者;adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 vowing | |
起誓,发誓(vow的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 bristled | |
adj. 直立的,多刺毛的 动词bristle的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 activists | |
n.(政治活动的)积极分子,活动家( activist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 unemployed | |
adj.失业的,没有工作的;未动用的,闲置的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 preoccupied | |
adj.全神贯注的,入神的;被抢先占有的;心事重重的v.占据(某人)思想,使对…全神贯注,使专心于( preoccupy的过去式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 capitalism | |
n.资本主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 ideology | |
n.意识形态,(政治或社会的)思想意识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 structural | |
adj.构造的,组织的,建筑(用)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 landslide | |
n.(竞选中)压倒多数的选票;一面倒的胜利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 prescription | |
n.处方,开药;指示,规定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 sector | |
n.部门,部分;防御地段,防区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|