-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
As Republicans start investigating Biden, the White House war room is ready to fight
There's an ornate suite2 of rooms deep inside the Eisenhower Executive Office Building that, in an earlier era, was used by the Secretary of War.
These days, a team of about two dozen White House lawyers, strategists and Capitol Hill veterans gathers regularly in that suite to plan their strategy for dealing3 with a barrage4 of oversight5 demands launched by House Republicans: an investigations7 'war room' that is literally8 working out of a war room.
Since President Biden took office, Republicans in Congress have often accused him and his administration of wrongdoing, but they had no real power to demand documents or compel testimony9. That changed in January when the GOP took over the House majority and all the investigative powers that come with it.
They have launched investigations into everything from internet companies and the "weaponization of government" to the Afghanistan withdrawal10 and the business dealings of the president's family, including his son Hunter. There are hearings scheduled just about every week they're in session, with committee chairmen regularly demanding documents from the administration.
At the White House, the team charged with responding has been trading letters with House committees. Ian Sams, a spokesperson for the White House counsel's office, said the team is willing to work in good faith on "substantive11" requests they view as legitimate12.
"Unfortunately, a lot of what we've seen so far have been political stunts13, and hearings going after things that the American public doesn't care about," Sams said.
The White House posture14 is to let Biden stay above the fray15, talking about his administration's accomplishments16 and goals.
Meanwhile, his team has been eager to undercut the investigations by sharing clips that they feel show Republicans overreaching, such as House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer predicting on Fox News that his plan to investigate "influence peddling17" in the Biden family would keep Biden from seeking reelection.
Polls indicate many Americans are skeptical18 of these investigations. The White House strategy is to reinforce that whenever possible. The White House bet is that Republicans will take things too far and turn off voters.
Outside groups are amplifying19 the White House message
In an ad from a group called the Congressional Integrity Project, ominous20 music plays as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan tells an audience that the investigations will "help frame up the 2024 race" when he hopes former President Donald Trump21 will run and win again.
The nonprofit political group, which is not required to disclose its donors22, is running the ad in swing districts held by Republicans.
When there are hearings, the group floods inboxes with talking points slamming Republican committee members.
"We wake up every morning and call attention to their lies and to their motivations," said Kyle Herrig, the group's executive director. "Beyond that, we are doing opposition23 research to call attention to their hypocrisy24. Folks like James Comer, Jim Jordan, the people running these investigations."
If this sounds like brass25 knuckles26 politics, it is. David Brock, a veteran of these sorts of partisan27 battles, leads another outside group that has sprung up to defend Biden called Facts First USA. It, too, doesn't name its donors.
"A group like ours can say and do things that the White House won't, can't, shouldn't say or do," said Brock. In particular, while the White House may not want to talk about Hunter Biden, Brock and his group won't shy away from the president's son or his infamous28 laptop.
Officially, the White House isn't endorsing29 these groups or their work but they also aren't disavowing them.
The investigations carry real risks for Biden ahead of 2024
Even though the White House is currently batting off House investigations, there are real political risks at play, particularly as a likely reelection campaign draws closer.
That's why a robust30 response is necessary, said Eric Schultz, who was part of the team that the Obama White House put together to respond to investigations that became household names like Benghazi, Fast and Furious and Solyndra.
"If there are hints of corruption31 or scandal or impropriety, that will undermine the president's ability to stay in the good graces of the electorate," said Schultz, who said he is a bit jealous Biden has air cover from outside groups that Obama didn't have.
"The right-wing ecosystem32 has enough horsepower that even nonsense can get traction," said Schultz, explaining the value of a robust response.
And as much as the White House would like to blow off the investigations, they actually do need to cooperate, said James Barnette, a partner with law firm Steptoe and Johnson. He was the top Republican lawyer with the House Energy and Commerce committee, which a decade ago led the investigation6 into Obama administration loans to failed solar panel maker33 Solyndra.
He said the White House has seasoned lawyers on this team who know how to handle investigations. Sometimes it can be hard to tell if the scathing34 letter coming from Capitol Hill is a serious demand for documents or more of a press release meant to generate attention. That's where negotiations35 between the legal teams on opposite ends of Pennsylvania Avenue come in.
"Republicans can hold hearings on anything they want, with any witnesses they want," said Barnette. "And if you're not at the table, you're going to be eaten for dinner."
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 suite | |
n.一套(家具);套房;随从人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 barrage | |
n.火力网,弹幕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 withdrawal | |
n.取回,提款;撤退,撤军;收回,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 substantive | |
adj.表示实在的;本质的、实质性的;独立的;n.实词,实名词;独立存在的实体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 stunts | |
n.惊人的表演( stunt的名词复数 );(广告中)引人注目的花招;愚蠢行为;危险举动v.阻碍…发育[生长],抑制,妨碍( stunt的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 posture | |
n.姿势,姿态,心态,态度;v.作出某种姿势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 fray | |
v.争吵;打斗;磨损,磨破;n.吵架;打斗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 accomplishments | |
n.造诣;完成( accomplishment的名词复数 );技能;成绩;成就 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 peddling | |
忙于琐事的,无关紧要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 skeptical | |
adj.怀疑的,多疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 amplifying | |
放大,扩大( amplify的现在分词 ); 增强; 详述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 ominous | |
adj.不祥的,不吉的,预兆的,预示的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 donors | |
n.捐赠者( donor的名词复数 );献血者;捐血者;器官捐献者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 hypocrisy | |
n.伪善,虚伪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 brass | |
n.黄铜;黄铜器,铜管乐器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 knuckles | |
n.(指人)指关节( knuckle的名词复数 );(指动物)膝关节,踝v.(指人)指关节( knuckle的第三人称单数 );(指动物)膝关节,踝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 infamous | |
adj.声名狼藉的,臭名昭著的,邪恶的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 endorsing | |
v.赞同( endorse的现在分词 );在(尤指支票的)背面签字;在(文件的)背面写评论;在广告上说本人使用并赞同某产品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 robust | |
adj.强壮的,强健的,粗野的,需要体力的,浓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 ecosystem | |
n.生态系统 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 maker | |
n.制造者,制造商 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 scathing | |
adj.(言词、文章)严厉的,尖刻的;不留情的adv.严厉地,尖刻地v.伤害,损害(尤指使之枯萎)( scathe的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|