-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Outside groups take a first stab at a Supreme1 Court ethics2 code
Finally, somebody has taken a try at writing a Supreme Court ethics code, though not the court itself. The justices reportedly have discussed the subject but apparently4 have not reached any agreement on what, if anything, to do about it.
Now, however, two groups have written what they call a model code of conduct for the Supreme Court. And it's getting generally favorable reviews. The groups are the Project on Government Oversight5, a nonpartisan, independent government watchdog, and the Lawyers Defending American Democracy.
Their effort follows an increasing drumbeat of criticism aimed at the court for perceived ethical7 lapses8 and failures to deal with them. Most recently the American Bar Association passed a resolution calling on the justices to adopt a binding9 code of ethics and urged other bar associations around the country to pass similar resolutions.
The proposed model code of conduct and accompanying commentary couches its objective in modest terms — to offer a proposal for further discussion and for the court to consider. While its recommendations are based on the already existing code of conduct that applies to lower federal court judges, the proposed Supreme Court code goes much further.
The recommendations
It recommends "clear and more stringent10 guidelines for recusal, prohibitions11 against conduct that creates an appearance of partiality, rigorous obligations for disclosure, and standards for transparent12 decision-making."
In particular, for instance, the model code would require justices to disqualify themselves from cases involving not only financial entanglements13 of family members, but lobbying activities of would-be litigants14 involved in a justice's confirmation15. And it would bar close family members from engaging in political or other activity that presents the appearance of partisanship16.
The proposed code would go further than the existing code for lower court judges, which bars participation17 in political activities. The proposal would also bar Supreme Court justices from appearing before groups with partisan6 or ideological18 agendas, groups like the conservative Federalist Society or the liberal American Constitution Society. And it would recognize that certain political activities by a spouse19 or other close family members would require justices to recuse themselves.
Such a provision would clearly have forbidden Justice Clarence Thomas from participating in a 2022 case involving the release of Trump20 White House records to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Thomas was the lone21 dissenter22 when the court refused President Trump's effort to shield those records from disclosure, records that later showed Thomas's wife, Ginni, had communications with top Trump White House officials, urging them to take steps to block certification of the election results.
'A starting point for a discussion'
"It's sort of beyond debate now that the justices do need a code of conduct," says Sarah Turberville, director of the Constitution Project at POGO. "This is a starting point for a discussion about what that code should look like."
The authors of the code acknowledge that "these additional rules would undoubtedly23 place additional burdens on the justices. They would prohibit some activities in which justices have freely engaged and subject them to additional scrutiny24." But, the authors contend, "this is an appropriate requirement for a lifetime position imbued25 with enormous power."
"We believe a code has intrinsic value because it clarifies the bounds of acceptable conduct," the authors say in their introduction. "Moreover, in cases of clearly egregious26 conduct...it could support Congress' impeachment27 power."
NYU law professor Stephen Gillers, author of perhaps the leading text on judicial28 ethics, says 85% of the recommendations in the proposed model code are already the rules for lower court judges, and the Supreme Court has said it consults those rules as guidelines for itself. But the proposed model code, he notes, calls for more disclosures of gifts and income sources for justices and their spouses29. That, he says, would be a big step forward. So too would be a requirement that justices explain why they recuse themselves from participating in a case. Other recommendations in the proposed code, says Gillers, are non-starters, like requiring that justices to put their assets in a blind trust.
The court isn't bound by a code of ethics
Gillers says he believes that the only reason the court has not actually been able to come up with a code of conduct for itself is that the justices "don't want to be pushed around. They don't want the clamor." Gillers' "read" is that the justices think it will "look weak. It will look like they are giving up their independence." But, he observes, "Every judge in America is governed by ethics rules. Except nine. And guess who they are?"
University of Virginia law professor Amanda Frost says the pressure on the court is bound increase. While she thinks that Congress could write an ethics code for the court, it would be far better for the justices to do it themselves. In fact, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., has proposed requiring the court to write its own ethics code, and to set a deadline.
It is unlikely that the court will do that until it reaches some sort of consensus30 among the nine. As professor Gillers observes, supposing three justices refuse to sign on to a new code, it would be worthless because there would be no internal pressure to comply. And peer pressure is really the only enforcement mechanism31 that might work.
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 lapses | |
n.失误,过失( lapse的名词复数 );小毛病;行为失检;偏离正道v.退步( lapse的第三人称单数 );陷入;倒退;丧失 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 binding | |
有约束力的,有效的,应遵守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 stringent | |
adj.严厉的;令人信服的;银根紧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 prohibitions | |
禁令,禁律( prohibition的名词复数 ); 禁酒; 禁例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 transparent | |
adj.明显的,无疑的;透明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 entanglements | |
n.瓜葛( entanglement的名词复数 );牵连;纠缠;缠住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 litigants | |
n.诉讼当事人( litigant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 Partisanship | |
n. 党派性, 党派偏见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 participation | |
n.参与,参加,分享 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 ideological | |
a.意识形态的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 spouse | |
n.配偶(指夫或妻) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 lone | |
adj.孤寂的,单独的;唯一的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 dissenter | |
n.反对者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 imbued | |
v.使(某人/某事)充满或激起(感情等)( imbue的过去式和过去分词 );使充满;灌输;激发(强烈感情或品质等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 egregious | |
adj.非常的,过分的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 impeachment | |
n.弹劾;控告;怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 spouses | |
n.配偶,夫或妻( spouse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|