-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Judge will hear arguments in a case that could threaten access to medication abortion1
A federal judge in Texas with deep ties to conservative religious groups will hear arguments in a case that could decide the future of access to a key abortion pill.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
A Texas federal judge is hearing arguments this morning in a case that could limit access to a drug widely used for medication abortions3.
SACHA PFEIFFER, HOST:
That pill is part of a two-drug protocol4 that's often the most accessible option for people in states with abortion restrictions5.
FADEL: NPR's Sarah McCammon is in Amarillo and joins us now. Hi, Sarah.
SARAH MCCAMMON, BYLINE6: Hi, Leila.
FADEL: So if you could just start by reminding us what this case is about and what's at stake here.
MCCAMMON: Yeah, it's about an abortion pill called mifepristone and whether or not the drug can stay on the market. It was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration more than 20 years ago. Major medical groups, like the American Medical Association, say it is conclusively7 safe and effective. But the drug has always been the subject of political debate, and medication abortion has become the dominant8 form of abortion in this country in recent years. So a coalition9 of groups who oppose abortion sued the FDA last year. They claim the drug was improperly10 approved, and they've asked a federal judge here in Amarillo, where this case was filed, to overturn the FDA approval.
FADEL: So really a lot at stake here in a closely watched case. What do we know about the judge who's overseeing it?
MCCAMMON: So his name is Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, and he has a lot of critics. And that is based on his track record. He was appointed by former President Donald Trump11. He has long-standing ties to conservative religious groups. And his critics accused the anti-abortion group that filed this lawsuit12 of judge shopping. You know, a law professor I spoke13 to at the University of Texas, Austin says that because of the way the federal courts work here, Leila, by filing in Amarillo, the plaintiffs were virtually assured of getting Judge Kacsmaryk assigned to the case.
FADEL: And what are you expecting to happen at the hearing today?
MCCAMMON: Well, this is all happening, first of all, after some big clashes over issues related to press access to the hearing.
FADEL: OK.
MCCAMMON: The Washington Post reported over the weekend that Judge Kacsmaryk had secretly scheduled the hearing but delayed announcing it publicly and that he told lawyers involved in the case to keep the details private. According to that report, he claimed that he was worried about protests and security. So a coalition of media groups objected to the delay on First Amendment14 grounds. The notice ultimately did get posted to the court's public docket on Monday - so just two days before the hearing. I should also say there will be no recording15 allowed in the courtroom. So, Leila, the effect of all of these rules and delays is that there will be very limited public access and very limited access for the press to these proceedings16.
FADEL: Wow.
MCCAMMON: A court official told me this is a small courtroom, and members of the press will be allowed in until it's full, you know, with our notebooks and pretty much nothing else. And each side will have two hours to present their arguments.
FADEL: OK. So you found out on Monday and then got on a plane yesterday, right? So it's - hopefully you get in.
MCCAMMON: Yeah, that's the goal.
FADEL: So the judge will hear from both sides today. What's likely to happen next?
MCCAMMON: Well, Judge Kacsmaryk has a few options here, aside from, you know, just leaving the drug on the market. Mifepristone is subject to some additional FDA rules on top of typical prescription17 drugs. And the Biden administration pared back some of those rules in recent years. The judge could just put them back in place - for example, stopping the pills from being sent by mail, which became popular during the pandemic. Or he could order the FDA to take the drug off the market altogether. Now, whatever the judge does, Leila, will likely be appealed. And it's very possible that this case will end up before the Supreme18 Court.
FADEL: NPR's Sarah McCammon reporting from Amarillo, Texas. Thank you so much, and I'm sure we'll hear more from you.
MCCAMMON: Thank you.
1 abortion | |
n.流产,堕胎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 abortions | |
n.小产( abortion的名词复数 );小产胎儿;(计划)等中止或夭折;败育 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 protocol | |
n.议定书,草约,会谈记录,外交礼节 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 conclusively | |
adv.令人信服地,确凿地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 dominant | |
adj.支配的,统治的;占优势的;显性的;n.主因,要素,主要的人(或物);显性基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 improperly | |
不正确地,不适当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 lawsuit | |
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 recording | |
n.录音,记录 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 prescription | |
n.处方,开药;指示,规定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|