-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Biden vetoes his first bill. The White House said it would have been bad for retirees
NPR's Leila Fadel talks to Jeffrey Sonnenfield, professor of management at Yale University, about investment decisions taking into consideration environmental, social and corporate3 governance factors.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
President Biden has vetoed his first bill.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Legislation passed by the Congress would put at risk the retirement4 savings5 of individuals across the country.
FADEL: The bill would stop retirement fund managers from considering environmental, social and governance factors, or ESG. To help us understand why ESG-conscious investments are now political, we'll turn to Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. He's a professor of management at Yale University. Good morning.
JEFFREY SONNENFELD: Good morning. Thanks for the invitation.
FADEL: Thanks for being here. So first, Jeffrey, if you could just briefly6 define what it means to consider environmental, social and governance factors around finances.
SONNENFELD: Well, thanks, Leila. I've been studying corporate social impact work for about, oh, almost 50 years, and it's grouped together different types of corporate social performance. The environmental has to do with sustainability, of course, and what we used to call conservation. Social has to do with dealings with race and gender7 and other factors such as that in the community. And then governance has to do with who's in control and the transparency and the independence and the integrity of the leadership, the oversight8 of the company.
FADEL: So why has this become a political issue? I mean, this is a rule at the Department of Labor9, and now something - it's something lawmakers, mostly Republican, want to change.
SONNENFELD: It's bewildering. It catches our attention today just because this is Biden's first veto, and his three predecessors10 each vetoed about perhaps 12 bills during their terms. And Ronald Reagan was the high watermark, almost 80 that he vetoed. But it was unusual 'cause this is Biden's first. But the idea of - it's also called stakeholder capitalism11, considering others in addition to shareholders12 - that's not new. In fact, 50 years ago, the Business Roundtable was created of business leaders just to focus on the fact that doing good is not antithetical to doing well. What's new is the backlash against it. And there's a lot of GOP political grandstanding trying to use this term of woke, or being, you know, awakened13 to social impact. And that's how this has become kind of a rallying cry. Even in tortured use into the Silicon14 Valley Bank collapse15, where it has zero relationship, they try to invoke16 it. And right now it's been trying to invoke it in how pension money is invested.
FADEL: So how does ESG affect the financial performance of companies or investments?
SONNENFELD: Well, doing good, as I said, is - often corresponds with doing well. There's a great deal of research that shows there's no trade-off. And in fact, many times the environmentally responsible or the ESG, the - oriented firms have performed better. Some of the hard part is there's been a confusion of terms and definitions, so I'm so glad you asked for it. But there are about 836 registered investment companies claiming ESG missions. It has become a bit of a fad2. And some of it's legitimate17, and some of it's a little bit confusing. But it's - we're approaching $53 trillion of - you know, almost a third of all global assets are coming under this term. And it has a lot of GOP legislators concerned because of what they argue is political overtones and issues they don't like on race, gender, environment and the like. But, you know, we have shown that of the 1,500 companies pulling out of Russia - that those who pulling out did actually much better. And you see that in a lot of dimensions.
FADEL: Professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld at Yale University, thank you so much.
SONNENFELD: Thank you.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 fad | |
n.时尚;一时流行的狂热;一时的爱好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 retirement | |
n.退休,退职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 savings | |
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 briefly | |
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 gender | |
n.(生理上的)性,(名词、代词等的)性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 predecessors | |
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 capitalism | |
n.资本主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 shareholders | |
n.股东( shareholder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 awakened | |
v.(使)醒( awaken的过去式和过去分词 );(使)觉醒;弄醒;(使)意识到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 silicon | |
n.硅(旧名矽) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 collapse | |
vi.累倒;昏倒;倒塌;塌陷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 invoke | |
v.求助于(神、法律);恳求,乞求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|