-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A Senate panel explores the current crisis in the banking1 industry
The collapse3 of Silicon4 Valley Bank will be the focus of a Senate hearing Tuesday. Senators want to know why it and a second bank failed this month, and how to prevent similar meltdowns in the future.
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
A textbook case of mismanagement.
A MART?NEZ, HOST:
That is how a top government regulator describes the meltdown at Silicon Valley Bank this month. Now, today, a Senate panel explores what went wrong at the bank, also why warnings from government supervisors5 were ignored and how to prevent similar bank failures in the future.
MARTIN: NPR's Scott Horsley is with us now with a preview. Scott, thank you so much for being here.
SCOTT HORSLEY, BYLINE6: Good morning, Michel.
MARTIN: So the Silicon Valley Bank collapse was the second-biggest bank failure in U.S. history. What do we know about what went wrong?
HORSLEY: It was a collision of some very old-fashioned banking mistakes with the fast-moving tech that Silicon Valley is famous for. The bank more than tripled in size in the last three years, and with that rapid growth, it didn't manage its risks very well. The bank invested a lot of money in government bonds that lost value when interest rates rose. Now, none of this came out of the blue. Government supervisors flagged problems at the bank in 2021 and again last year. In fact, when Federal Reserve officials were briefed last month about the hole that rising interest rates were putting in some bank balance sheets, Silicon Valley Bank was singled out as a poster child. Nevertheless, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell says the problems were not addressed until it was too late.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
JEROME POWELL: The supervisory team was, apparently7, very much engaged with the bank repeatedly and was escalating8. But, you know, nonetheless, what happened happened.
HORSLEY: And what happened was a massive and surprisingly rapid run on the bank. Ninety percent of Silicon Valley's deposits were uninsured, and when customers got wind of the problems through text messages and social media, they pulled money out faster than anybody expected.
MARTIN: But, Scott, if government supervisors were aware of the problems, why weren't they fixed9 sooner?
HORSLEY: I'm sure there's going to be questions about that during today's hearing. The Fed itself is looking at how effective supervisors are and whether they have the tools they need. The Fed also says it's looking at its own culture to see if it's adequately supporting bank supervisors. Dennis Kelleher, who heads the watchdog group Better Markets, says for the last five years or so, the culture at the Fed has leaned towards deregulation and a light touch on bank oversight10.
DENNIS KELLEHER: In fact, The Wall Street Journal had a big headline in 2018 that said "Banks To Get Kinder, Gentler Treatment Under Trump11 Regulators" (ph), and the entire story was about how the Fed people in Washington were beating up on the supervisors to go easy on the bankers.
HORSLEY: Now, it may be that some stronger legislation comes out of this mess, but that's a pretty tall order in a divided Congress. What's more likely are some new rules and maybe some more aggressive bank oversight.
MARTIN: So there's certainly going to be a call to do something because remind us just of how costly12 this was, right?
HORSLEY: Right. The FDIC estimates that backstopping all the deposits at Silicon Valley Bank is going to cost the government's insurance fund $20 billion. Now, that's not coming from taxpayers13, but it will come from an assessment14 on other banks. And there's likely to be debate about how much deposit insurance should be available. Deposits are typically only insured up to $250,000, but Silicon Valley's top 10 customers had a combined $13 billion in the bank. Most customers at main-street banks don't have anything like that. And Anne Balcer, who's with the Independent Community Bankers, say they don't want to shoulder the cost of insuring bigger, riskier15 banks. Now, the FDIC does have some discretion16 in how the insurance bill is divvied up, and it's expected to make some recommendations in about a month.
MARTIN: That is NPR's Scott Horsley. Scott, thank you.
HORSLEY: You're welcome.
1 banking | |
n.银行业,银行学,金融业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 collapse | |
vi.累倒;昏倒;倒塌;塌陷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 silicon | |
n.硅(旧名矽) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 supervisors | |
n.监督者,管理者( supervisor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 escalating | |
v.(使)逐步升级( escalate的现在分词 );(使)逐步扩大;(使)更高;(使)更大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 costly | |
adj.昂贵的,价值高的,豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 assessment | |
n.评价;评估;对财产的估价,被估定的金额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 riskier | |
冒险的,危险的( risky的比较级 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 discretion | |
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|