-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
This is Morning Edition from NPR news. I am Steve Inskeep and I am Susan Stamberg.
Russian and Chinese forces today begin 8 days of joint1 military exercises. Some ten thousand troops are expected to take part, making this their largest joint military operation since Russia and China fought US-led forces during the Korean War. Moscow and Beijing say the exercises which are called "Peace Mission 2005" are designed to counter terrorism, extremism and separatism. But the type of weaponry involved suggests a broader agenda. NPR's Vicky O'Hara reports.
The land, sea, and air exercises will begin in the Russian port of Vladivostok and then move to China's coastal2 Shandong province. They are expected to include fighter jets, landing craft, anti-submarine vessels3 and long-range bombers4. Jonathan Polic, an Asian specialist at the US Naval5 War College, is skeptical6 of the official rationale for the exercises.
There is a/ isn't notional scenario7 that has been identified here that would involve some kind of a breakdown8 in authority in an unidentified country, therefore, ahh, enabling or requiring Russia and China to demonstrate the capability9 to intervene, to restore order but, you know, some of these activities will include live-fire exercises, including some actual testing of cruise missile capabilities10 by Russian long-range bombers in the Yellow Sea.
According to reports from Russia, China originally wanted to hold the exercises closer to Taiwan, which it has threatened to attack if it pursues independence. But Russia resisted holding the exercises near Taiwan. Again, Jonathan Polic.
The Russians are at pains to argue that this does not have any implications for third party situations and in that read the question of Taiwan, but the demonstration11 of certain kinds of capabilities, the testing of cruise missiles and so forth12, puts down a marker here even if it does not have any immediate13 direct implications for Taiwan.
Washington has been quite restrained in its public comments about the exercises. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack says China and Russia advised Washington of what they had planned.
We are following the exercise. Eh...we expect that they will be conducted in a manner that supports some mutual14 goal of regional stability shared by the United States, China and Russia.
The exercises are notable not only for the types of weapon systems involved, but for the fact that they are being held on Chinese soil. China is extremely sensitive about its sovereignty. And since Russia and China had a falling-out in the late 1950s, the relationship between the two communist giants has been characterized by mistrust. Peter Brooks15, director of Asian studies at the Heritage Foundation, says the joint exercises are small in scale but huge in implication.
This is a further warming of the strategic partnership16 between Moscow and Beijing that was struck back in the 1990s. And it's my view that they signaled the first real post cold war steps beyond the rhetoric17 by Russia and China to balance and ultimately diminish US power across Asia.
Peter Brooks notes that both Russia and China have been upset over US support for democracy movements in their region. Over the past year and a half, the people of the former Soviet18 states of Ukraine, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan have overthrown19 autocratic governments. Analyst20 CC of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies says Beijing and Moscow also are incensed21 by the US bases in Central Asia installed after 9/11.
Both Russia and China feel that those bases in some ways compromise their own security and they no longer buy the rationale that they are there for purposes of combating terrorism. The Chinese, in particular, believe that those bases are part of an encirclement strategy that the United States has followed vis-a-vis China these past several years.
CC says what is most worrisome for the United States about the joint exercises is not increased cooperation between Moscow and Beijing, but Russian arm sales to China.
Russia today is the only reliable military supplier to China and you've seen enormous amounts of military equipment, primarily, aircraft, submarines and ships flowing from Russia to China. And that also supports Russia's ailing22 defense23 industries.
Michael Swaine, a senior associate in the China program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace says Russia may be using the joint exercises to showcase its wares24 to a very good customer.
There are some indications that the Russians are trying to sell strategic more long-range aircraft that could launch cruise missiles and that the Chinese are interested in these. And those types of weapons are apparently25 going to be used in this exercise.
The United States has tried to convince Russia over the years not to sell weapons to China, but too little effect.
Vicky O'Hara, NPR news Washington.
Russian and Chinese forces today begin 8 days of joint1 military exercises. Some ten thousand troops are expected to take part, making this their largest joint military operation since Russia and China fought US-led forces during the Korean War. Moscow and Beijing say the exercises which are called "Peace Mission 2005" are designed to counter terrorism, extremism and separatism. But the type of weaponry involved suggests a broader agenda. NPR's Vicky O'Hara reports.
The land, sea, and air exercises will begin in the Russian port of Vladivostok and then move to China's coastal2 Shandong province. They are expected to include fighter jets, landing craft, anti-submarine vessels3 and long-range bombers4. Jonathan Polic, an Asian specialist at the US Naval5 War College, is skeptical6 of the official rationale for the exercises.
There is a/ isn't notional scenario7 that has been identified here that would involve some kind of a breakdown8 in authority in an unidentified country, therefore, ahh, enabling or requiring Russia and China to demonstrate the capability9 to intervene, to restore order but, you know, some of these activities will include live-fire exercises, including some actual testing of cruise missile capabilities10 by Russian long-range bombers in the Yellow Sea.
According to reports from Russia, China originally wanted to hold the exercises closer to Taiwan, which it has threatened to attack if it pursues independence. But Russia resisted holding the exercises near Taiwan. Again, Jonathan Polic.
The Russians are at pains to argue that this does not have any implications for third party situations and in that read the question of Taiwan, but the demonstration11 of certain kinds of capabilities, the testing of cruise missiles and so forth12, puts down a marker here even if it does not have any immediate13 direct implications for Taiwan.
Washington has been quite restrained in its public comments about the exercises. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack says China and Russia advised Washington of what they had planned.
We are following the exercise. Eh...we expect that they will be conducted in a manner that supports some mutual14 goal of regional stability shared by the United States, China and Russia.
The exercises are notable not only for the types of weapon systems involved, but for the fact that they are being held on Chinese soil. China is extremely sensitive about its sovereignty. And since Russia and China had a falling-out in the late 1950s, the relationship between the two communist giants has been characterized by mistrust. Peter Brooks15, director of Asian studies at the Heritage Foundation, says the joint exercises are small in scale but huge in implication.
This is a further warming of the strategic partnership16 between Moscow and Beijing that was struck back in the 1990s. And it's my view that they signaled the first real post cold war steps beyond the rhetoric17 by Russia and China to balance and ultimately diminish US power across Asia.
Peter Brooks notes that both Russia and China have been upset over US support for democracy movements in their region. Over the past year and a half, the people of the former Soviet18 states of Ukraine, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan have overthrown19 autocratic governments. Analyst20 CC of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies says Beijing and Moscow also are incensed21 by the US bases in Central Asia installed after 9/11.
Both Russia and China feel that those bases in some ways compromise their own security and they no longer buy the rationale that they are there for purposes of combating terrorism. The Chinese, in particular, believe that those bases are part of an encirclement strategy that the United States has followed vis-a-vis China these past several years.
CC says what is most worrisome for the United States about the joint exercises is not increased cooperation between Moscow and Beijing, but Russian arm sales to China.
Russia today is the only reliable military supplier to China and you've seen enormous amounts of military equipment, primarily, aircraft, submarines and ships flowing from Russia to China. And that also supports Russia's ailing22 defense23 industries.
Michael Swaine, a senior associate in the China program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace says Russia may be using the joint exercises to showcase its wares24 to a very good customer.
There are some indications that the Russians are trying to sell strategic more long-range aircraft that could launch cruise missiles and that the Chinese are interested in these. And those types of weapons are apparently25 going to be used in this exercise.
The United States has tried to convince Russia over the years not to sell weapons to China, but too little effect.
Vicky O'Hara, NPR news Washington.
点击收听单词发音
1 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 coastal | |
adj.海岸的,沿海的,沿岸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 vessels | |
n.血管( vessel的名词复数 );船;容器;(具有特殊品质或接受特殊品质的)人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 bombers | |
n.轰炸机( bomber的名词复数 );投弹手;安非他明胶囊;大麻叶香烟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 naval | |
adj.海军的,军舰的,船的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 skeptical | |
adj.怀疑的,多疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 breakdown | |
n.垮,衰竭;损坏,故障,倒塌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 capability | |
n.能力;才能;(pl)可发展的能力或特性等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 capabilities | |
n.能力( capability的名词复数 );可能;容量;[复数]潜在能力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 demonstration | |
n.表明,示范,论证,示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 brooks | |
n.小溪( brook的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 Soviet | |
adj.苏联的,苏维埃的;n.苏维埃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 overthrown | |
adj. 打翻的,推倒的,倾覆的 动词overthrow的过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 incensed | |
盛怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 ailing | |
v.生病 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 wares | |
n. 货物, 商品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|