-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
You're watching multisource politics video news analysis from Newsy.In the left corner -- President Obama. And in the right,Representative Paul Ryan,delivering the Republican response.Chairman of the House Budget Committee and rising star of the GOP. Representative Paul Ryan will give the official Republican response after the president’s televised speech.
Did we say rising star of the right? On Fox News, Karl Rove -- raves1.
“When it comes to budget, and when it comes to spending, he is the brainiest, most thoughtful, deepest thinker on the Republican side of the aisle2 in the House.”
“He's very young, 41 years old but has seven congressional terms behind him, clearly a guy who has accomplished3 a lot at a relatively4 young age.”
But he’s got some competition. Or does he?As soon as Republican leaders tapped Ryan for the rebuttal - Tea Party darling Michele Bachmann say she, too, is responding -- on behalf of the Tea Party.
The economy will top the agenda - in both the State of the Union address as well as the Republican responses. Initially5 ,Bachmann’s response was only going to be available online - but CNN has announced plans to carry it live. The network asked Democratic strategist Paul Begala - is a second Republican response a good idea?
“Yes, I think it’s for her, but I don't think it's helpful for the Republican party for the reasons Susan states. And maybe not so much for the Democrats6. We go for the glittery sharp object out there, and forget it's a fishing lure7 and we get hooked. We get distracted by Michele Bachmann when we should be focusing on Paul Ryan.”
And CBS suggests - the whole thing begs the question - who’s really leading the Republican Party?A Republican strategist says - two responses doesn’t mean there’s two different Republican parties.
“There were stories before the election that there was a schism8 with the tea party and the establishment. Yet, we still won 60-plus seats in the house. So I think that the Republican Party is still unified9 on core messages, which is we need to cut spending well, need to reign10 in the size of government and focus on growing the economy, so whether it's Michelle Bachmann giving it in one venue11 and Paul Ryan giving it in another, the message is still the same...”
Not necessarily - writes Washington Monthly’s Steve Benen,who worries,the fiscal12 hawk13 from Wisconsin could get mischaracterized. And that COULD be bad news for Democrats.
“I can only hope that Paul Ryan isn't positioned as the ‘middle’ -- literally14 and figuratively -- between the president and Bachmann. [Ryan] is after all, a hard-core radical15, intent on destroying Medicare and Social Security. Bachmann's wild-eyed craziness shouldn't make Ryan appear reasonable by comparison, but it might.”
Still, The Washington Post’s Adam Serwer says no matter what’s said tonight -- he doesn’t expect much to change.
“After tonight, talking about cutting spending will still be popular, while actually gutting16 the social safety net won't be. Neither the president's speech, nor Ryan or Bachman's response will change that.”
Stay with Newsy for multi-source analysis of the president’s address and the Republican response.
1 raves | |
n.狂欢晚会( rave的名词复数 )v.胡言乱语( rave的第三人称单数 );愤怒地说;咆哮;痴心地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 aisle | |
n.(教堂、教室、戏院等里的)过道,通道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 initially | |
adv.最初,开始 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 lure | |
n.吸引人的东西,诱惑物;vt.引诱,吸引 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 schism | |
n.分派,派系,分裂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 unified | |
(unify 的过去式和过去分词); 统一的; 统一标准的; 一元化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 venue | |
n.犯罪地点,审判地,管辖地,发生地点,集合地点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 fiscal | |
adj.财政的,会计的,国库的,国库岁入的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 hawk | |
n.鹰,骗子;鹰派成员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 gutting | |
n.去内脏v.毁坏(建筑物等)的内部( gut的现在分词 );取出…的内脏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|