英语 英语 日语 日语 韩语 韩语 法语 法语 德语 德语 西班牙语 西班牙语 意大利语 意大利语 阿拉伯语 阿拉伯语 葡萄牙语 葡萄牙语 越南语 越南语 俄语 俄语 芬兰语 芬兰语 泰语 泰语 泰语 丹麦语 泰语 对外汉语

美国有线新闻 CNN 2015-11-01

时间:2015-11-04 06:45来源:互联网 提供网友:yajing   字体: [ ]
特别声明:本栏目内容均从网络收集或者网友提供,供仅参考试用,我们无法保证内容完整和正确。如果资料损害了您的权益,请与站长联系,我们将及时删除并致以歉意。
    (单词翻译:双击或拖选)

 If a student does something wrong, how far can schools  discipline that student under the law. The answer to that question has changed a lot in just a less  few decades. It used to be police officers really wanted in shools thirty years ago, but that all changed in the 1990s. In 1994 congress passed the gun-free schools act. The act requires states receiving federal funding to pass some very specific laws about student discipline. This laws led to a massive increase of plolice presence in schools. The school resource officer or SRO is a deputized ploice officer who stationed right there on campus. As a result, schools now have police forces station on campus. Not surprisingly conducts that used to be just on-campus disciplines became a criminal case. There is arguably some good justification for increased police presence in school. There have been tragic school shootings over the last couple of decades and there are real concerns about increased security on campus. So when it comes to schools' disciplining students, the legal authority has expanded dramatically. If a student misbehaves, brings weapons to school, or otherwise breaks the law, school resource officers can and will arrest the student. It's what we have deputized them to do, and it is within the law.

本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎点击提交分享给大家。
------分隔线----------------------------
顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
最新评论 查看所有评论
发表评论 查看所有评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
验证码:
听力搜索
推荐频道
论坛新贴