-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
We're getting started in the U.S. capital, where Senate Republicans have been working to get President Donald Trump's Supreme1 Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch, confirmed to the high court. A few Democrats3 said they'd vote for Judge Gorsuch as well, but most of them have been working to block the nomination4. And in the back and forth5 between the political parties, both a filibuster6 and the nuclear option came into play yesterday.
We defined these terms on Wednesday's show. You can find that in our archives at CNN10.com.
What's interesting about the filibuster and the nuclear option is that neither of them is actually mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. The American governing document allows the congressional chambers7, the House and Senate, to set their own rules.
The filibuster is a tradition, a sort of rule that allows a minority party to block a nominee8 or piece of legislation, and a nuclear option is a rule change that allows a majority party to get around that block and vote with a simple majority.
Republicans control the Senate. They have 52 seats. While Democrats and the independents who vote with them have 48 seats.
After yesterday's move to invoke9 the nuclear option, both parties have now used the controversial rule change and this time around, it was expected to lead to the confirmation10 of Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.
CHRIS CILLIZZA, CNN POLITICS REPORTER: The one thing to know about the nuclear option is you may not understand it, but it does really matter.
SUBTITLE11: The One Thing: The "nuclear option".
CILLIZZA: The nuclear option is sort of a common place term for a way in which the filibuster rules of the Senate are end run, usually to stop debate on any matter in front of the Senate, you need to get 60 votes.
But if you use the nuclear option, you take that 60-vote margin12 and take it down to a majority 51-vote threshold. In 2013, Harry13 Reid, after months and months of threatening to deploy14 the nuclear option actually did it.
SEN. HARRY REID (D), NEVADA: It's time to get the Senate working again, not for the good of the current Democratic majority or some future Republican majority, but for the good of the United States of America.
CILLIZZA: The filibuster, whether real or threaten, had always been a way that the Senate distinguish itself from the House. The House very much runs in a "majority rule" rule. If you have the votes, you have the votes. In the Senate, in order to close off that debate, which means to force an actual majority vote, you needed always to have 60. It required typically some bipartisan consensus15 building, because neither party often had 60-plus seats in their control.
When you remove that, you start to slide even further down the slippery slope that Harry Reid started us all on in 2013. If we've already wiped out the use of the traditional filibuster, that 60-vote margin on several things including Supreme Court nominees16, what's to stop either this majority or the next majority, Democrat2 or Republican, from instituting it on legislative17 matters? And at that point, the Senate fully18 becomes the House.
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 nomination | |
n.提名,任命,提名权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 filibuster | |
n.妨碍议事,阻挠;v.阻挠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 chambers | |
n.房间( chamber的名词复数 );(议会的)议院;卧室;会议厅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 invoke | |
v.求助于(神、法律);恳求,乞求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 subtitle | |
n.副题(书本中的),说明对白的字幕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 margin | |
n.页边空白;差额;余地,余裕;边,边缘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 harry | |
vt.掠夺,蹂躏,使苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 deploy | |
v.(军)散开成战斗队形,布置,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 nominees | |
n.被提名者,被任命者( nominee的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|