-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The Democratic race for Michigan governor is getting spirited, but all three candidates still find plenty to agree on ? including criticism of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality for granting Nestle Waters North America permission to tap up to 400 gallons of water per minute (up from 250 gallons) from one Osceola County well.
Gretchen Whitmer, Abdul El-Sayed and Shri Thanedar each spoke1 out against the proposal, in some cases even before Gov. Rick Snyder's administration granted the permit in April.
Although their language differed, all three candidates were accurate in their main argument: Michigan is charging next to nothing to allow the Swiss conglomerate2 to make a handsome profit off the state's water.
The claims
At a March 22 event, Whitmer, the former Senate minority leader from East Lansing, said: "We have Nestle, that's pulling as much ground water out as they want and pay a one-time, minuscule3 fee for doing it."
In remarks posted to social media, she said Nestle is "pulling as much water out of the ground without paying for it."
In April, El-Sayed blasted the state's decision to end free bottled water to lead-contaminated Flint while approving the Nestle permit, two very different but emotional water issues.
"I want you to think about the lack of empathy that this governor has shown. In the same week that he basically turned on the taps free of charge for Nestle, he shuts it off for Flint," said El-Sayed, the city of Detroit's former health director.
The statement followed other criticisms from El-Sayed about the permit.
Why isn't Lansing listening to the 80,945 public comments against Nestle's water extraction? Millions of dollars that Nestle pays to buy politicians. Time for politicians that prioritize citizens' needs over corporate4 greed.
Thanedar, an Ann Arbor5 businessman, took to social media to call the DEQ permit "absolutely unacceptable."
"Nestle has taken enough of our water, and they've done so paying only pennies on the dollar," Thanedar wrote.
Absolutely unacceptable. Nestle has taken enough of our water, and they've done so paying only pennies on the dollar. It's time we restrict Nestle's grab on our water.
The facts
Nestle has nine wells feeding its Michigan plant for its Ice Mountain brand. It pays $3.50 per thousand gallons it pumps from two of those wells owned by the City of Evart — the same utility rate residents pay, according to City Manager Zackary Szakacs.
But the increased withdrawals6 aren't from those wells. And even in that case, Nestle and other ratepayers are technically7 paying to deliver the water, not for the water itself.
"Whether you're taking the water for growing crops, building widgets, drinking water or bottling it, we don't pay," Noah Hall, a professor of environment and water law at Wayne State University, recently told Bridge Magazine.
The DEQ permit at issue applies to a well just outside of Evart, in Osceola Township. It's outside of any municipal water system, so Nestle does not pay utility bills for what could amount to more than 210 million gallons per year under the DEQ's permit. Like other states, Michigan law generally allows property owners to take water under their land for free so long as it doesn't interfere8 with river navigability or the rights of others.
Nestle has told Bridge it "pays the costs to build and maintain the infrastructure9, energy and taxes, like all other Osceola Township businesses who do not rely on the neighboring Evart municipal supply."
But then what's the "one-time, miniscule fee" Whitmer mentions? Or the "pennies on the dollar," from Thanedar's Facebook post?
Nestle, which sold $4.5 billion in bottled water last year, pays an upfront $5,000 fee to the state for the processing of its environmental permit, as well as a $200 annual fee.
Those offset10 administrative11 costs of processing the permits, but again, don't pay for the water.
The verdict
Yes, Nestle is basically getting the Osceola Township water for "free" or "without paying for it." It's also true that Nestle pays the state small fees associate with its pumping — dollars that are dwarfed12 by its profits.
And while the candidates could have noted13 that other states also charge little for water, their statements nonetheless are accurate.
1 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 conglomerate | |
n.综合商社,多元化集团公司 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 minuscule | |
adj.非常小的;极不重要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 arbor | |
n.凉亭;树木 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 withdrawals | |
n.收回,取回,撤回( withdrawal的名词复数 );撤退,撤走;收回[取回,撤回,撤退,撤走]的实例;推出(组织),提走(存款),戒除毒瘾,对说过的话收回,孤僻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 technically | |
adv.专门地,技术上地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 offset | |
n.分支,补偿;v.抵消,补偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 administrative | |
adj.行政的,管理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 dwarfed | |
vt.(使)显得矮小(dwarf的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|