-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
We're going to spend the next few minutes talking about one of the other major stories of recent months - excuse me - sexual harassment2. In a few minutes, we'll hear a perspective on how religious institutions struggle to deal with complaints about sexual misconduct by clergy3.
While a lot of the stories have rightly focused on what happened, they often don't get to the question of why some people, mainly men, sexually harass1 their colleagues and others don't. And one person who's been thinking about that question since the 1980s is psychologist John Pryor of Illinois State University. Years ago, he designed a scale to measure how likely someone is to sexually harass. I started by asking him about what motivated his research and how he developed it.
JOHN PRYOR: I designed the "Likelihood To Sexually Harass Scale" using some common stereotypes4 about men in power situations. In fact, one of the scenarios5 I developed focused on the casting couch in Hollywood. So I asked college men to imagine that they had such a job and that there's a woman they're attracted to. And I asked them, how likely is it that they would offer a role in a film in exchange for sexual favors?
One of the things that let me know I was onto something when I first started working on this was that there was a high level of consistency6 in men's responses to this. So men who would say that they would perform this act of sexual coercion7 in one situation were highly likely to say they'd do it in other situations. Conversely, you see that men who said they wouldn't do it were also unlikely to say they would do it in other situations.
MARTIN: Do you find specific characteristics in the individuals who are likely to engage in this conduct?
PRYOR: There are a series of beliefs that people have about sexual harassment that represent kind of a psychological underpinning8 for this kind of behavior - beliefs like women asking for it or women making false complaints. I can't tell you how many people I've been interviewed by ask me, what about the false complaints? Well, there are many false complaints. There are not many complaints period.
Some of the things that we see have to do with a lack of perspective-taking or empathy for other people. One of the other things I can tell you that's kind of consistent with that is that we can reduce the willingness of men to engage in sexual coercion - sexual harassment - by inducing them to think long and hard about perspectives of women. So that shows that, as a variable, something like taking the perspective of others is a very important thing, I believe.
MARTIN: What has struck you about - I mean, as we mentioned earlier, you started this research three decades ago. But now, the floodgates have been opened within the last couple of months, and there's all these different industries, as we've mentioned, including this one, where this behavior has been revealed. I'm just - I'm curious how you have reacted to this, as a person who's been studying this for so long.
PRYOR: One of the things that I and many others have concluded is it's a really common kind of thing to see some forms of sexual harassment in the workplace. So it's not surprising that you have all these people saying yeah, me too - this happened to me too. So I think that maybe what's surprising is why it took so long for people to come forth9.
One of the things that I suspect though, with regard to why it has taken so long - and I'll speculate here - is I think that admitting that you were a target or a victim of sexual harassment is somewhat of a stigma10. So people generally avoid identifying themselves as having some kind of stigmatizing11 characteristic or stigmatizing behavior they've encountered.
But when you start to see people coming forth in public, one of the things you do is you start to remove some of the stigma. So what we see is when women hear other women say, oh, this happened to me, this happened to me, and you think, yeah, it happened to me, and they're less likely to think they're going to be treated negatively for coming forth and saying that it happened to them.
MARTIN: John Pryor is a distinguished12 professor emeritus13 at Illinois State University. He created the "Likelihood To Sexually Harass Scale." We talked to him at the studios at Illinois State University.
Professor Pryor, thanks so much for speaking with us.
PRYOR: Thank you, Michel. It's nice to talk to you.
1 harass | |
vt.使烦恼,折磨,骚扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 harassment | |
n.骚扰,扰乱,烦恼,烦乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 clergy | |
n.[总称]牧师,神职人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 stereotypes | |
n.老套,模式化的见解,有老一套固定想法的人( stereotype的名词复数 )v.把…模式化,使成陈规( stereotype的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 scenarios | |
n.[意]情节;剧本;事态;脚本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 consistency | |
n.一贯性,前后一致,稳定性;(液体的)浓度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 coercion | |
n.强制,高压统治 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 underpinning | |
n.基础材料;基础结构;(学说、理论等的)基础;(人的)腿v.用砖石结构等从下面支撑(墙等)( underpin的现在分词 );加固(墙等)的基础;为(论据、主张等)打下基础;加强 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 stigma | |
n.耻辱,污名;(花的)柱头 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 stigmatizing | |
v.使受耻辱,指责,污辱( stigmatize的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 emeritus | |
adj.名誉退休的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|