-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
Now we want to tell you about a fictional1 treatment of a serious policy debate - guns. Since the Parkland shooting and massive demonstrations2 around the country led by a vocal3 group of teenagers, advocates for gun control hope this may be a turning point for them. But if a bracing4 satire5 by a former congressman6 is accurate, then maybe not.
The author is Steve Israel. He is a Democrat7. He represented New York's 3rd Congressional District until he decided8 not to run again in 2016. Steve Israel joins us now from our studios in New York. And we'll let him try to describe the crazy plot without giving too much away. Congressman, thanks so much for joining us.
STEVE ISRAEL: Well, thanks for having me on. Appreciate it.
MARTIN: All right, well, let me start, and then you can kind of pick up the thread here. The novel starts in Chicago. The mayor there wants to do something about the gun violence that's spiraling out of control. So he calls on other cities around the country to ban them. And in this little town on Long Island, the mayor there decides that she wants to do that. And then it becomes this battle royale. Go ahead. You pick it up from there.
ISRAEL: Well, the problem that this small-town mayor has is her town happens to have the summer residence of Otis Cogsworth, who is the owner of Cogsworth International Armaments. He is one of the largest gun manufacturers in America. And he decides he's going to use the gun lobby to pass a bill in Congress that mandates9 that every American must own and carry a gun with common-sense exceptions for minors10 under the age of 7.
MARTIN: Well, let me just read a passage from the point of view of the head of public relations for a big gun manufacturer. And you write, she gazed out a window toward the Capitol, already shimmering11 in Washington's early morning heat. There was a time she'd been inspired by the site. Now, she thought of it merely as a massive cash register sheathed12 in marble. She put money in. She took money out. OK. So Shakespeare you aren't, but (laughter)...
ISRAEL: (Laughter) I never pretended to be.
MARTIN: OK, but is it really that bad?
ISRAEL: You know, there's a common belief that the gun lobby pumps tons of money into the campaigns of candidates. It's really not that. It's the intensity13 of so-called gun voters. I remember talking to my colleagues after they voted against sensible things like no fly, no buy, which says that if you aren't allowed on an airplane, you shouldn't be able to get a military-style assault weapon. Or they voted against additional funding for research of gun violence.
And when we went onto the members-only elevator, which is one of the few places where you can speak confidentially14 to your colleagues, they would tell me they were ashamed of their votes. And I would say, well, why did you vote against those things? And the answer was, I can't go home to my district and face those NRA voters who will not forgive me for those votes. And that's why we're in the mess we're in.
MARTIN: So I do want to mention you don't just write snarky novels. You wrote a piece after the Parkland shooting encouraging teenagers to say, OK, you know, marching is one thing, but you can make a difference in competitive districts. And you pointed15 out...
ISRAEL: Exactly.
MARTIN: ...Some of those competitive districts. And I'm just wondering how you square that against the tone of this novel. I mean, one of the reviewers for Newsday, for example, said that, you know, harder to swallow is the book's relentless16 cynicism, which at times registers as sour, even cheap. "Big Guns" feels oddly resigned. And I have to ask you about that. Yes, it's a novel.
ISRAEL: (Laughter) Sure.
MARTIN: I get it. It's a satire. I get it. But it does have this feeling of there is nothing you can do. Nothing's going to change, ever. And how do you square that?
ISRAEL: Well, look, I could not write a book - whether it was satirical or not - that puts any kind of glow on this issue. The fact of the matter is that the United States' Congress has had opportunities to act to reduce gun violence. And on each and every occasion, it hasn't. The number one most-asked question in America after a mass shooting is when will Congress do something? I lived through it - over 32 mass shootings in my 16 years. And I decided to answer the question. And the best way that I can answer the question was from the inside, where it is most absurd. And the most honest way I could answer the question is to expose the truth with satire. Now, I could have done, I guess, a dry policy book explaining voter intensity among gun voters versus17 non-gun voters. But you know, other than my mom, I don't know that anybody would have bought that book.
MARTIN: (Laughter) I understand. I think the question I'm asking you, though...
ISRAEL: Yeah.
MARTIN: ...Is that I guess I was just struck by the optimism and the sense of mission...
ISRAEL: Right, right.
MARTIN: ...That you expressed in your op-ed...
ISRAEL: Yes.
MARTIN: ...Where you're telling these kids to, you know, go out here and make a difference, and this is how you can make a difference. And then I read your book...
ISRAEL: Yes.
MARTIN: ...Which seems to say that nothing matters. That is honestly what I was struck by.
ISRAEL: So after the Las Vegas shooting, I actually did a piece for The New York Times that the Times headlined "Nothing Will Change." And I explained why Congress will not act.
Now, since Parkland, I'm a little bit more hopeful, but my hopeful is tempered by 16 years of witnessing some of the reasons to be cynical18. And the point for these children - these kids - is this. It's very important to march - and I spoke19 at one of the marches - but they've got to march to the right places. They've got to go into what is a temporary alignment20 right now of the most competitive congressional districts in the country in the upcoming midterm, where you have a pro-NRA incumbent21 who's being challenged by somebody who will take on the gun lobby. There are about 15 of those districts.
So my point is you can have hope, but you've got to be strategic. And we need to go into those districts, make the phone calls, knock on doors, make the case because if we can only win five of those 15 districts, that will make a change in Congress. And what do I mean by that? There is nothing more elucidating22 to a member of Congress than seeing his or her colleagues lose to an ideology23. And when that happens - when they see members of Congress losing their election because these young people were able to motivate voters - you will not be surprised at how quickly those who remain in Congress will change their positions and maybe start voting on some measures that will reduce that gun violence.
MARTIN: Steve Israel is a former congressman from New York. His latest novel is "Big Guns."
Mr. Israel, thank you so much for speaking with us.
ISRAEL: Thanks so much.
1 fictional | |
adj.小说的,虚构的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 demonstrations | |
证明( demonstration的名词复数 ); 表明; 表达; 游行示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 vocal | |
adj.直言不讳的;嗓音的;n.[pl.]声乐节目 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 bracing | |
adj.令人振奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 satire | |
n.讽刺,讽刺文学,讽刺作品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 mandates | |
托管(mandate的第三人称单数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 minors | |
n.未成年人( minor的名词复数 );副修科目;小公司;[逻辑学]小前提v.[主美国英语]副修,选修,兼修( minor的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 shimmering | |
v.闪闪发光,发微光( shimmer的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 sheathed | |
adj.雕塑像下半身包在鞘中的;覆盖的;铠装的;装鞘了的v.将(刀、剑等)插入鞘( sheathe的过去式和过去分词 );包,覆盖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 intensity | |
n.强烈,剧烈;强度;烈度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 confidentially | |
ad.秘密地,悄悄地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 relentless | |
adj.残酷的,不留情的,无怜悯心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 versus | |
prep.以…为对手,对;与…相比之下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 cynical | |
adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的,不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 alignment | |
n.队列;结盟,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 incumbent | |
adj.成为责任的,有义务的;现任的,在职的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 elucidating | |
v.阐明,解释( elucidate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 ideology | |
n.意识形态,(政治或社会的)思想意识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|