-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
You know, what if is a really great question. It can unleash1 the imagination in all kinds of ways. Now, sure, you can find yourself lost in a grass is greener kind of rabbit hole, but if used in moderation, wondering what if can be a fascinating intellectual exercise. And it must be said that sports fans are particularly good at the what if. Sports, after all, is full of counterfactual possibilities replete2 with drama.
(SOUNDBITE OF SPORTS MONTAGE)
UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER #1: Deep to left - Yastrzemski will not get it. It's a home run.
UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER #2: There's Paxson to three. Yes. The Bulls...
UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER #3: Lloyd with Morgan streaking3. She's chipping the goalkeeper.
MARTIN: Mike Pesca loves this drama, and he understands well the power of the what-if, which is why he has put together a new book titled "Upon Further Review: The Greatest What-Ifs In Sports History." And he joins us now. Mike Pesca, host of The Gist4 and friend of the show, thanks for being with us.
MIKE PESCA, BYLINE5: Well, thank you for having me, Rachel. And I do think - so you were saying sports fans understand what-ifs. I was thinking, as you said that, it's more as if we've had it thrust upon us...
MARTIN: (Laughter).
PESCA: ...Because in every league, there are many, many more losers than winners, right? Every season ends with a team either not making the playoffs or being eliminated from the playoffs.
MARTIN: Right.
PESCA: That means everyone's a loser. And in almost all cases, every one of those losers has a moment, and their fans have a moment, when they say what if - legitimate6 or not, and it's often legitimate. And sometimes, the what-if extends beyond one pitch, and it goes to that draft pick we didn't make eight years ago. That's kind of the engine of sports.
MARTIN: OK. So this is 31 different chapters, 31 different scenarios8, of what-ifs written by some of the country's greatest sportswriters. And I just want to go through a couple of these different scenarios. I want to start with one essay written by Jason Gay of The Wall Street Journal. And his essay is titled "What If Football Had Been Deemed Too Boring In 1899?". So start us off by explaining what was happening in 1899.
PESCA: 1899 - they were inventing this game. It turned into carnage between the lines. It was eventually rehabbed by Theodore Roosevelt because too many people were dying. But back then, it was just, you know, bunches of guys grunting9 into a line and going two yards at a time. So football was boring then. What if it stayed boring and there was no football in America? And so Jason paints a picture of Sundays that are free for, perhaps, to worship at your local church. The foam10 finger industry would certainly take a big setback11. Soccer might be more popular. There are many ways that football has entangled12 itself in the rhythm of life that maybe we don't even think about and he tries to untangle that.
MARTIN: I mean, it's in our - it's in our language. I mean, it wasn't really until I read that essay that I realized how many sports metaphors13, but particular to football, creep into our everyday speech.
PESCA: That's right. Imagine if the nuclear codes were contained in the baseball. Maybe that would be different. I don't know.
(LAUGHTER)
MARTIN: So is he arguing that the demise14 in football - let's say it was super boring and it went away as a cultural phenomenon. Is he arguing that that is a good thing, that we as an American people would benefit if we had less football in our lives?
PESCA: He is just asking us to consider the possibilities. And this is one type of what-if essay that you throw a pebble15, the ripples17 happen, and all Jason's doing with the essay is looking at the ripples and saying, oh, I didn't know it would ripple16 there in that particular way. There are other forms of essay which really talk about the sociological impact. And some of these are binary18. The thing happens or the thing doesn't happen. And some of them are more, you know, let's just set in motion a set of actions and see what results.
MARTIN: So let's talk about one of those scenarios with much broader global implications really. This is by Shira Springer who writes about - well, I'll just say the title of the essay - "What If The United States Had Boycotted19 Hitler's Olympics?" I mean, that's huge.
PESCA: Yes.
MARTIN: Primarily, the first thing that comes to mind is that those Olympics made Jesse Owens a cultural icon20.
PESCA: They did. And what happened to Jesse Owens afterwards was a crime, essentially21. He was shunned22 in America to a large degree after being a hero who stood up to Hitler. They burnished23 Hitler's credentials24. They established the Olympics as a political tool where they were supposed to transcend25 politics. And the great thing about that essay is it's also a history lesson, and history seems like it's inevitable26. The march of history - well, of course, that was going to happen and of course Jesse Owens wins, and we close our eyes and we could see at least the newsreel footage. And when you erase27 the memory, I don't know exactly what you replace it with, but that's what Shira and a lot of the other essayists are trying to provide.
MARTIN: And lastly, I want to talk about this essay - this is so great. This is written by Paul Snyder, who is a track athlete, and his essay is titled "What If A Blimp Full Of Money Had Exploded Over World Track Headquarters In 1952?" And I will shorthand the premise28 here. It's about big money in sports in America, and we don't need to say that track and field - not a lot of money there. So let's imagine that there were.
PESCA: Right.
MARTIN: So lay out what that looks like.
PESCA: Well, one scenario7 is that the battles we saw on the hardwood between Wilt29 Chamberlain and Bill Russell very well could have taken place on the track because...
MARTIN: By hardwood, we mean the basketball court.
PESCA: That's right. But what if this all played out mano a mano, Russell against Chamberlain, on the track? And then he, as this huge track nerd, analyzes30 for himself if he would have liked that because I think fans of niche31 media do this thing where they wish it was bigger. They say, why doesn't everyone like this, you know, kind of prog rock that I do? But then he realizes that part of the appeal of track for him is the nerdom (ph)...
MARTIN: Totally.
PESCA: ...And is also the things inherently that stops it from being a huge sport in America. It's always kind of a nice contemplation on that level.
MARTIN: I know. I loved the idea that to be a super successful sport it needs to be uber competitive and there needs to be all kinds of, like, aggression32 around it. And it seemed to me by the end of it he's just like, we're too nice. Like, track people, we're just, like, way too nice to be a really popular sport in America because it's just not what American sports culture is about.
PESCA: Yeah. Well, at least that's his perception of them, and maybe the niceness has something to do with the fact that there isn't blimps full of money sloshing around. Look, I have to be honest with you. All I ever wanted to do was write a book of essays that was blimp related, and this was the only chance that I could get a dirigible in there.
(LAUGHTER)
MARTIN: The book is a really fun read. It is called "Upon Further Review: The Greatest What-Ifs In Sports History," written by Mike Pesca, who is the host of The Gist on Slate33. And he's got a new podcast about this very book and the essays contained in it. The podcast is called Upon Further Review. Mike, thanks so much.
PESCA: You're welcome.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE LONDON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA AND ROYAL CHORAL SOCIETY'S "CHARIOTS OF FIRE")
1 unleash | |
vt.发泄,发出;解带子放开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 replete | |
adj.饱满的,塞满的;n.贮蜜蚁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 streaking | |
n.裸奔(指在公共场所裸体飞跑)v.快速移动( streak的现在分词 );使布满条纹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 gist | |
n.要旨;梗概 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 scenarios | |
n.[意]情节;剧本;事态;脚本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 grunting | |
咕哝的,呼噜的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 foam | |
v./n.泡沫,起泡沫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 setback | |
n.退步,挫折,挫败 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 entangled | |
adj.卷入的;陷入的;被缠住的;缠在一起的v.使某人(某物/自己)缠绕,纠缠于(某物中),使某人(自己)陷入(困难或复杂的环境中)( entangle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 metaphors | |
隐喻( metaphor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 demise | |
n.死亡;v.让渡,遗赠,转让 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 pebble | |
n.卵石,小圆石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 ripple | |
n.涟波,涟漪,波纹,粗钢梳;vt.使...起涟漪,使起波纹; vi.呈波浪状,起伏前进 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 ripples | |
逐渐扩散的感觉( ripple的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 binary | |
adj.二,双;二进制的;n.双(体);联星 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 boycotted | |
抵制,拒绝参加( boycott的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 icon | |
n.偶像,崇拜的对象,画像 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 shunned | |
v.避开,回避,避免( shun的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 burnished | |
adj.抛光的,光亮的v.擦亮(金属等),磨光( burnish的过去式和过去分词 );被擦亮,磨光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 credentials | |
n.证明,资格,证明书,证件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 transcend | |
vt.超出,超越(理性等)的范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 erase | |
v.擦掉;消除某事物的痕迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 premise | |
n.前提;v.提论,预述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 wilt | |
v.(使)植物凋谢或枯萎;(指人)疲倦,衰弱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 analyzes | |
v.分析( analyze的第三人称单数 );分解;解释;对…进行心理分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 niche | |
n.壁龛;合适的职务(环境、位置等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 aggression | |
n.进攻,侵略,侵犯,侵害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 slate | |
n.板岩,石板,石片,石板色,候选人名单;adj.暗蓝灰色的,含板岩的;vt.用石板覆盖,痛打,提名,预订 | |
参考例句: |
|
|