-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:
As we've been saying, President Trump1 has reversed himself, signing an executive order that ends the separation of families at the border. That may quell2 some of the outrage3 over his policy, but as NPR's David Folkenflik argues, it's not likely to quell questions about whether White House officials are telling the truth.
DAVID FOLKENFLIK, BYLINE4: This isn't about spin or splitting hairs or differing opinions. This is a reality check about our expectations of the people who act in our name. On Monday, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen held a press conference. The White House press corps5 was relentless6.
(SOUNDBITE OF PRESS CONFERENCE)
UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #1: How is this not specifically child abuse?
FOLKENFLIK: Nielsen didn't back down.
(SOUNDBITE OF PRESS CONFERENCE)
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN: Those who criticize the enforcement of our laws have offered only one countermeasure - open borders.
FOLKENFLIK: The idea there's only the Trump way or anarchy7 doesn't have much currency outside the administration and its allies in conservative media. President Trump's fellow Republicans in Congress have said for days he could change the policy (snapping) like that. The president today says he's done so. Back on Monday, his Homeland secretary embarked8 on a series of insupportable assertions.
(SOUNDBITE OF PRESS CONFERENCE)
NIELSEN: It's not a policy.
FOLKENFLIK: Yeah, that is a policy. Nielsen herself said there needed to be a break in how presidents Obama and George W. Bush handled people coming across the border. If an intentional9 shift in how to deal with people seeking asylum10 is not a policy, what meaning does the word policy have? Then, there was this.
(SOUNDBITE OF PRESS CONFERENCE)
UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #2: Are you intending for this to play out as it is playing out? Are you intending for parents to be separated from their children? Are you intending to send a message?
NIELSEN: I find that offensive. No, because why would I ever create a policy that purposely does that?
UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #2: Perhaps it's deterrence11.
NIELSEN: No.
FOLKENFLIK: Call it a deception12, an evasion13, a technical nicety. NPR will not call it a lie because it cannot gauge14 Nielsen's intent. I don't speak for the network. I'd say the word lie fits. Regardless, NPR and other news organizations say Nielsen was dead wrong, that there clearly was a policy.
Here's White House chief of staff John Kelly back in May talking with NPR's John Burnett in an interview that made headlines around the world.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED BROADCAST)
JOHN KELLY: The laws are the laws, but a big name of the game is deterrence. If...
JOHN BURNETT, BYLINE: So family separation stands as a pretty tough deterrent15.
KELLY: Could be tough deterrent. Would be a tough deterrent.
FOLKENFLIK: Kelly said the same to CNN when considering the policy back in early 2017. So did U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions Monday night on Fox News. So why would Secretary Nielsen seek to deceive the public about that? The tone comes from the top, set that first weekend of Trump's presidency16 with spurious claims of record crowds at his inauguration17. It emerged again on Friday.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #3: But can you tell us?
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: It's irrelevant18. It's a statement to The New York Times - the phony, failing New York Times.
FOLKENFLIK: Trump was speaking to a clutch of reporters on the White House lawn. He was justifying19 untrue claims from his lawyers last year, denying that Trump had anything to do with his son Don Jr.'s statements about meeting with Russians during the 2016 campaign. Don Jr.'s statement turned out to be untrue. So were the denials of the president's involvement. Trump doesn't care.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
TRUMP: Wait a minute. Wait a minute.
UNIDENTIFIED PERSON #3: To clear it up.
TRUMP: That's not a statement to a high tribunal of judges. That's a statement to the phony New York Times.
FOLKENFLIK: So that's what you might well call a double deception - a lie about a lie. I sure would. But what you call it almost doesn't matter. It's that the media and the public register a fundamental fact. Top people speaking for the United States aren't telling the truth, starting with the president. I'm David Folkenflik.
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 quell | |
v.压制,平息,减轻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 outrage | |
n.暴行,侮辱,愤怒;vt.凌辱,激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 corps | |
n.(通信等兵种的)部队;(同类作的)一组 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 relentless | |
adj.残酷的,不留情的,无怜悯心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 anarchy | |
n.无政府状态;社会秩序混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 embarked | |
乘船( embark的过去式和过去分词 ); 装载; 从事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 intentional | |
adj.故意的,有意(识)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 asylum | |
n.避难所,庇护所,避难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 deterrence | |
威慑,制止; 制止物,制止因素; 挽留的事物; 核威慑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 deception | |
n.欺骗,欺诈;骗局,诡计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 evasion | |
n.逃避,偷漏(税) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 gauge | |
v.精确计量;估计;n.标准度量;计量器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 deterrent | |
n.阻碍物,制止物;adj.威慑的,遏制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 inauguration | |
n.开幕、就职典礼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 irrelevant | |
adj.不恰当的,无关系的,不相干的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 justifying | |
证明…有理( justify的现在分词 ); 为…辩护; 对…作出解释; 为…辩解(或辩护) | |
参考例句: |
|
|