-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
Seven big fast-food chains have backed down under pressure. They've agreed to stop blocking workers from taking jobs at other restaurants in the same chain. Washington state's attorney general was threatening to sue over this. And now, the chains, including Arby's, Jimmy John's and Cinnabon, among others, will stop enforcing or using these practices across the U.S. Here's NPR's Yuki Noguchi.
YUKI NOGUCHI, BYLINE1: For many years, fast-food franchises3 agreed not to recruit or hire each other's workers within the same chain. These no-poach agreements, as they are known, meant a worker couldn't get better pay or move up the ladder by going to another location within the chain. Washington state's top government attorney, Bob Ferguson, says such agreements are clearly illegal.
BOB FERGUSON: These no-poach clauses, I think, are an example of a rigged system. You're a worker. You have no idea this clause exists. You haven't signed it. And yet when you try to go to another business to improve your wages, you can't do it because of this condition in a contract that you never signed.
NOGUCHI: Ferguson says the fact that the seven chains conceded bodes4 well for workers at other fast-food chains.
FERGUSON: We have a lot more fast-food chains that we're investigating and that we expect to come to the table and sign similar deals. If they don't, we will litigate.
NOGUCHI: Princeton economist5 Alan Krueger has written about the prevalence of no poach agreements in most franchise2 operations, not just in fast food.
ALAN KRUEGER: I think it's a major accomplishment6.
NOGUCHI: He says such restrictions7 make the labor8 market work inefficiently9, keeping wages artificially low.
KRUEGER: I think it's very hard to come up with a sound business justification10 for this practice other than reducing competition for workers.
NOGUCHI: Ferguson and other attorneys general say they will also seek to end the practice in other franchised11 industries as well. Yuki Noguchi, NPR News, Washington.
1 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 franchise | |
n.特许,特权,专营权,特许权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 franchises | |
n.(尤指选举议员的)选举权( franchise的名词复数 );参政权;获特许权的商业机构(或服务);(公司授予的)特许经销权v.给…以特许权,出售特许权( franchise的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 bodes | |
v.预示,预告,预言( bode的第三人称单数 );等待,停留( bide的过去分词 );居住;(过去式用bided)等待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 accomplishment | |
n.完成,成就,(pl.)造诣,技能 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 inefficiently | |
adv.无效率地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 justification | |
n.正当的理由;辩解的理由 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 franchised | |
v.给…以特许权,出售特许权( franchise的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|