-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
NOEL KING, HOST:
The midterm elections are four months away. And there are real concerns about election interference. Yesterday, at the Aspen Security Forum2, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats talked about the threat that Russia poses.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
DAN COATS: I think we have to be relentless3 in terms of calling out the Russians for what they've done. We have to be vigilant4 in terms of putting steps in place to make sure it doesn't happen again.
KING: I talked with NPR reporter Miles Parks about whether there's more security around these upcoming elections than there was around the presidential election in 2016.
MILES PARKS, BYLINE5: When you think about how Russians operated this cyberattack, basically, a lot of it was what's called spear phishing - targeted emails to try and get passwords from people. Election officials were not thinking like targets before the summer of 2016. And there was a lot of clicking on emails like that. Now they're thinking like targets. And that kind of changes the game in a lot of different ways. But now that caveat6 - the technology that we're actually using to vote - that has not really changed in the past two years. One study found that 41 states will use equipment to vote in this upcoming midterm election that's more than a decade old.
KING: Ten years old.
PARKS: Yeah, exactly. Earlier this week, I asked Senator Marco Rubio how confident he is in America's voting system. And here's what he told me.
MARCO RUBIO: I'm confident about America's election system. But I'm equally confident about the determination and the capability7 of Russian intelligence to interfere1 in ways that most people don't think about. It's not about changing votes, necessarily.
KING: When Rubio says it's not about changing votes, what does he mean? What is he saying that he is worried about?
PARKS: What he's talking about is voter confidence. Basically, this scenario8 does not involve actually affecting vote tallies9. What it involves is going into voter registration10 systems, changing where people are supposed to cast their ballots11, breaking into election websites that are supposed to show the winners and then showing losers instead. And basically, that sews chaos12 within the voting public without ever affecting or changing a vote.
KING: What is the government doing to fix this or to at least improve it?
PARKS: Right, so Congress did allocate13 $380 million this year to election security, which is a big deal. But it's important to realize that money in context. The state of California got more money than that for the 2000 elections to overhaul14 just their voting infrastructure15. I don't want to say it's a drop in the bucket, but it's not enough to actually affect the hardware that people are voting on. It's going to go towards trainings and software improvements and things like that. What's unclear is whether there's more money coming down the road. House Democrats16 released a report earlier this month that said it would cost about $1.4 billion over the next 10 years to actually get America's voting infrastructure up to where we need it to be.
KING: And so when President Trump17 sort of veers18 back and forth19 on the extent to which Russia interfered20 in the 2016 election, as we've seen him do this week, what effect does that have on the government's ability to get the money out there and to get the job done?
PARKS: Right. I think it definitely doesn't help, so the National Association of Secretaries of State actually released a statement after that remarkable21 press conference in Helsinki earlier this week. And they asked the White House to, quote, "provide clear and accurate statements going forward." And then when you look at the fact that it's been academic groups and private sector22 groups who've actually made a lot of strides in training election workers and thinking about this issue in - on the big picture, it kind of shows that the government has had trouble making this a priority.
KING: NPR's Miles Parks. Thank you so much, Miles.
PARKS: Thank you.
1 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 forum | |
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 relentless | |
adj.残酷的,不留情的,无怜悯心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 vigilant | |
adj.警觉的,警戒的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 caveat | |
n.警告; 防止误解的说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 capability | |
n.能力;才能;(pl)可发展的能力或特性等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 tallies | |
n.账( tally的名词复数 );符合;(计数的)签;标签v.计算,清点( tally的第三人称单数 );加标签(或标记)于;(使)符合;(使)吻合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 registration | |
n.登记,注册,挂号 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 ballots | |
n.投票表决( ballot的名词复数 );选举;选票;投票总数v.(使)投票表决( ballot的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 chaos | |
n.混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 allocate | |
vt.分配,分派;把…拨给;把…划归 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 overhaul | |
v./n.大修,仔细检查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 veers | |
v.(尤指交通工具)改变方向或路线( veer的第三人称单数 );(指谈话内容、人的行为或观点)突然改变;(指风) (在北半球按顺时针方向、在南半球按逆时针方向)逐渐转向;风向顺时针转 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 interfered | |
v.干预( interfere的过去式和过去分词 );调停;妨碍;干涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 sector | |
n.部门,部分;防御地段,防区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|