-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
A poll from NPR and Marist College out today suggests elections officials are right to worry about voters' confidence. About 1 out of every 3 respondents thinks a foreign country is likely to change vote tallies1 and results in the upcoming midterm elections. Joining us now is Miles Parks, who covers voting for NPR. Hi, Miles.
MILES PARKS, BYLINE2: Hi, Ari.
SHAPIRO: What do you make of this figure - 1 in 3 afraid that this will happen even though there's no evidence that it's happened in the past?
PARKS: Right. I'm going to be honest with you. I was completely shocked by seeing this number. There is no evidence in the history of American politics that a country has ever affected3 vote tallies. What was really interesting to me is that it did give credence4 to something I've been hearing over and over again from election officials that I've been talking to this year who are worried about this Russian interference story in the ether that voters aren't really getting the nuance5 here when they hear about a voter registration6 system being hacked7. They're concerned that voters aren't fully8 understanding that that's not affecting tallying9. That's not affecting the results of who actually won the election. And that's really, really bad for voter confidence long-term.
SHAPIRO: Who are the 1 in 3 that are most concerned about this?
PARKS: So it breaks down to mostly Democrats10 and mostly non-white voters. And that non-white voter number is really interesting as a demographic in a lot of places in this poll. More than 50 percent of non-white voters think there's going to be some votes in the November midterms that are just not going to get counted. And then other data in this poll also suggests that voting is harder for minorities, that they're waiting in line longer and that they're traveling farther to get to their polling place. So it is interesting that this skepticism about Russia changing votes also comes along with a group who's historically been disenfranchised when it comes to voting.
On the other end of the spectrum11, only about 13 percent of Republicans think a foreign country is going to manipulate results, and more than 70 percent of Republicans think the U.S. is prepared for the midterm elections.
SHAPIRO: Could all of that have an impact on voter turnout in November?
PARKS: I was really interested in that question, so I went and talked to David Becker, who founded the Center for Election Innovation and Research. What he basically told me is, no, he doesn't think it's going to have any effect in November. You look at the primaries we've seen already this year, and there's been historic turnout in a lot of Democratic primaries. What he said is he thinks that the Trump12 effect is going to be stronger than any negative effect that this story is having on elections this year. But long-term, he has a lot of worries about this partisan13 divide that's coming with elections. Here he is.
DAVID BECKER: I'm not optimistic. I worry that we're in a point in time right now where most can only view facts through partisan lenses. And this is not only one party that's doing this. This is both parties. We are giving voters so many reasons not to vote.
SHAPIRO: Does this poll have any good news about election security?
PARKS: I think the good news is that the majority of people still think elections are fair here. A small majority - about 53 percent - think the U.S. is prepared for midterms. But I think the real good news is that people are paying attention to a lot of this story, a lot of the election interference issue in a way they weren't before this year. You look at paper ballots14, for instance. We asked respondents how they felt about paper ballots versus15 electronic voting. And you're seeing across-the-board support for paper ballots, which is something cybersecurities experts really highly recommend.
Also, when you talk to local election officials, you're just hearing a difference in the way they're talking about this issue. Cybersecurity is a part of the job description in a way it wasn't in, say, 2015. That's really become apparent, and it's something that's been actionable since 2016.
SHAPIRO: That's NPR's Miles Parks. Thanks, Miles.
PARKS: Thank you.
1 tallies | |
n.账( tally的名词复数 );符合;(计数的)签;标签v.计算,清点( tally的第三人称单数 );加标签(或标记)于;(使)符合;(使)吻合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 credence | |
n.信用,祭器台,供桌,凭证 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 nuance | |
n.(意义、意见、颜色)细微差别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 registration | |
n.登记,注册,挂号 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 hacked | |
生气 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 tallying | |
v.计算,清点( tally的现在分词 );加标签(或标记)于;(使)符合;(使)吻合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 spectrum | |
n.谱,光谱,频谱;范围,幅度,系列 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 ballots | |
n.投票表决( ballot的名词复数 );选举;选票;投票总数v.(使)投票表决( ballot的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 versus | |
prep.以…为对手,对;与…相比之下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|