-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
There is an uncanny sense of we have been here before when it comes to the debate over border security. Today President Trump1 again travels to El Paso, Texas, to make his case for the wall. Negotiations2 are at a standstill again, and the stakes are the same. A partial government shutdown looms3. President Trump has threatened that if he doesn't get what he wants from congressional Democrats4, he could declare a national emergency to build the wall. Congress, though, could push back. NPR White House correspondent Tamara Keith reports.
TAMARA KEITH, BYLINE5: Under the National Emergencies Act of 1976, the president can declare an emergency for just about anything. As President Trump has considered using that authority to circumvent6 Congress and build a wall, that near unlimited7 presidential power has gotten a lot of attention. But it isn't the whole story. Congress also gave itself the ability to terminate an emergency declaration. But in the more than 40 years since the law was passed, only one member of Congress has ever tried it.
GEORGE MILLER8: It was a lever that we had, and we decided9 to use it.
KEITH: George Miller is a retired10 Democratic congressman11 from California, and the year was 2005.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
GEORGE W. BUSH: There is a recovery on the way. There's progress being made.
KEITH: In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, President George W. Bush issued a proclamation saying government contractors12 could pay workers less than usual for recovery-related projects. He justified13 it saying the conditions caused by Katrina constituted a national emergency. But Miller and others in Congress objected.
MILLER: To suggest that they should work at lower wages was just an insult.
KEITH: Miller introduced a resolution under the National Emergencies Act to terminate Bush's action. Under the law, the relevant committee had 15 days to consider the measure and vote. On day 14, President Bush announced he would revoke14 his own proclamation. That was the closest Congress ever came to voting to rescind15 a presidential emergency under the 1976 law. John Lawrence was a young congressional staffer back when the Emergencies Act was passed.
JOHN LAWRENCE: The context of the time was Congress really on a bipartisan basis reaching to claw back power from what was then known as an imperial presidency16.
KEITH: But over the decades, Congress hasn't asserted itself. Here's Andrew Rudalevige, a professor of government at Bowdoin College.
ANDREW RUDALEVIGE: The catch was that for them to actually rein17 in presidential power, Congress would have to take action. They'd have to pay attention. They'd have to be willing to go against the will of a president even of their own party. They haven't done that.
KEITH: But that could change if President Trump follows through on his threat. A Democratic leadership aide tells NPR the House will vigorously challenge Trump if he declares an emergency, and that would likely include a resolution like the one Miller introduced back in 2005. If the Democratically controlled House were to pass it under the law, the Republican Senate would have no choice but to vote on it. Several Republican senators, including Roy Blunt from Missouri, have been cautioning the president, please don't put us in that position.
ROY BLUNT: I have real concerns about it. But I'm not going to start talking about the floor strategy and how I'm going to vote and how the House is going to vote until we get there. And I hope we don't get there.
KEITH: But if they do get there and a resolution were to pass, President Trump could still veto it. Until now, presidents have typically used emergencies in line with congressional intent, says Russell Riley, a presidential scholar at the Miller Center. But what Trump is contemplating18 would be different, he says.
RUSSELL RILEY: Having gone to Congress repeatedly, having not gotten his way with them, you can't simply throw your hands up and say, oh, you know, my commander in chief powers now will be invoked19 to declare an emergency.
KEITH: For a president whose time in office has been defined by busting20 norms and who relishes21 being different from his predecessors22, it would be fitting that Trump could become the first president to have Congress actually vote to terminate an emergency declaration. Tamara Keith, NPR News.
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 looms | |
n.织布机( loom的名词复数 )v.隐约出现,阴森地逼近( loom的第三人称单数 );隐约出现,阴森地逼近 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 circumvent | |
vt.环绕,包围;对…用计取胜,智胜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 miller | |
n.磨坊主 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 contractors | |
n.(建筑、监造中的)承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 revoke | |
v.废除,取消,撤回 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 rescind | |
v.废除,取消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 rein | |
n.疆绳,统治,支配;vt.以僵绳控制,统治 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 contemplating | |
深思,细想,仔细考虑( contemplate的现在分词 ); 注视,凝视; 考虑接受(发生某事的可能性); 深思熟虑,沉思,苦思冥想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 invoked | |
v.援引( invoke的过去式和过去分词 );行使(权利等);祈求救助;恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 busting | |
打破,打碎( bust的现在分词 ); 突击搜查(或搜捕); (使)降级,降低军阶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 relishes | |
n.滋味( relish的名词复数 );乐趣;(大量的)享受;快乐v.欣赏( relish的第三人称单数 );从…获得乐趣;渴望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 predecessors | |
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|