-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
President Trump1 is calling for a fundamental overhaul2 of how the United States handles immigration. The president unveiled the proposal at a ceremony in the White House Rose Garden yesterday. His plan favors immigrants who are younger and more educated.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: We discriminate3 against genius. We discriminate against brilliance4. We won't anymore once we get this passed.
GREENE: Now, immigration, of course, has been a major focus for the Trump administration, but many of its efforts to reshape and restrict who is admitted to the U.S. have been blocked either by the courts or by Congress, and this proposal may be next. NPR's Joel Rose covers immigration and joins us in our studios in Washington. Hi, Joel.
JOEL ROSE, BYLINE5: Hey, David.
GREENE: All right. So the president has a plan that would prioritize so-called merit-based immigration. I just wonder, like, what is the criteria6 that they would use in terms of who to admit?
ROSE: Right. Well, like you said at the top, it would favor immigrants who are younger, who have more education, more skills, more income, who speak English and who can pass a civics exam. All of that would be a really big change in how we do legal immigration in this country, a shift away from family reunification - you know, reunification based on family ties - which has been the basis of our immigration system for decades now. And also, this would mean shifting away from, you know, certain humanitarian7 immigration, like the refugee resettlement program.
GREENE: It sounds like the reaction so far from Congress has been very negative - and not just from Democrats8.
ROSE: Yeah. That's right. Immigration hard-liners don't really like this plan either because it wouldn't actually reduce legal immigration. It would just change the profile of the people who can come in, but it would keep the overall number of new green cards at about the same level as now, at about a million per year. And Democrats don't like it because it doesn't really address their big concerns on immigration, including what to do about the roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants who are already here in the country. And Democrats control the House, so you really can't pass legislation without them.
GREENE: But could it be because his approach so far hasn't really worked? I mean, what is his track record so far in getting some of the changes he's talked about?
ROSE: It's mixed. Some of the administration's most ambitious efforts to restrict immigration have been stymied9 by the courts. The administration has tried to punish so-called sanctuary10 cities, for example, that limit their cooperation with immigration authorities. Courts have widely rejected those efforts. Today, a court in California will consider whether the president can use a national emergency declaration to redirect money to build his signature wall on the southern border.
And there are other administration efforts that are still in the pipeline11. The administration has talked about punishing immigrants who use food stamps or who get subsidized health care or live in public housing. And finally, the administration has run into a fair amount of trouble trying to limit who can get asylum12 in this country. Remember the family separation policy of a year ago?
GREENE: Right.
ROSE: That was supposed to deter13 migrants from seeking asylum in the U.S., but the president had to walk it back under intense pressure, and migrants are still arriving in big numbers at the southern border.
GREENE: But, I mean, it's fair to say he's gotten some of his - the crackdown and tougher approach that he's wanted.
ROSE: For sure. You know, the Supreme14 Court upheld his travel ban on immigrants and visitors from seven countries, including several majority-Muslim countries. Deportations and arrests are way up since Trump took office. The administration has cut refugee admissions to their lowest level in decades. Those are maybe the high-profile changes that have gone through. But the administration's also made a lot of smaller changes to rules and regulations, and immigration experts say those things may really make a big difference when you add them all up.
GREENE: NPR's Joel Rose covers immigration for us. Joel, thanks so much.
ROSE: You're welcome.
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 overhaul | |
v./n.大修,仔细检查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 discriminate | |
v.区别,辨别,区分;有区别地对待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 brilliance | |
n.光辉,辉煌,壮丽,(卓越的)才华,才智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 criteria | |
n.标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 humanitarian | |
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 stymied | |
n.被侵袭的v.妨碍,阻挠( stymie的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 sanctuary | |
n.圣所,圣堂,寺庙;禁猎区,保护区 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 pipeline | |
n.管道,管线 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 asylum | |
n.避难所,庇护所,避难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 deter | |
vt.阻止,使不敢,吓住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|