-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:
The Food and Drug Administration approved a new form of therapy today for a devastating1 genetic3 disease. It is providing hope for babies born with this rare but often fatal disorder4. But as NPR health correspondent Rob Stein reports, at more than $2 million, the treatment is the most expensive drug ever approved.
ROB STEIN, BYLINE5: When Donovan Weisgarber was born, he seemed perfectly6 healthy. But within weeks, his mom, Laura, says it became clear something was wrong - terribly wrong.
LAURA WEISGARBER: It was when he was about 1 month old - was when we started to notice some symptoms.
STEIN: He started getting really fussy7, stopped squirming and got weaker and weaker. Turns out Donovan had a genetic disorder, spinal8 muscular atrophy9. It was destroying the nerves that control his muscles. Many babies don't live beyond their second birthday. It's the most common genetic cause of death among infants.
WEISGARBER: We were devastated10 obviously. Yeah, you know, obviously you're devastated. It was definitely the worst time of our lives.
STEIN: But then doctors told Laura and her husband, Matthew, about something new. They might be able to replace the defective11 gene2 killing12 Donovan with a new type of gene therapy. So they agreed to let doctors infuse Donovan with genetically13 modified viruses carrying healthy genes14 into his body. Donovan slowly started to improve, and three years later, Donovan still needs a wheelchair and a feeding tube but otherwise is doing great, his mom says.
WEISGARBER: You know, he loves going outside. He loves playing with his family. He goes to preschool. So yeah, he gets to do a lot of normal things. So it's just - I mean, it's amazing.
STEIN: And Donovan isn't alone. This gene therapy has been saving other babies with spinal muscular atrophy. David Lennon is the president of AveXis, the company that makes what's now called Zolgensma.
DAVID LENNON: First of all, a hundred percent of the kids survived. And this is a population where 92% of the kids would expect to have died or be on permanent ventilation by the time they're 20 months old. But then we also saw additional things. A lot of these kids could swallow. Seventy-five percent of these kids were able to sit. And we actually had a few kids who were able to stand and walk independently.
STEIN: Based on these results, Lennon says the company is justified15 in setting the price at $2.125 million for each child, which would make it the most expensive drug ever approved. And that price tag is making a lot of jaws16 drop.
PETER BACH: You know, it's absolutely stunning17.
STEIN: Peter Bach studies health policy at Memorial Sloan Cancer Center in New York.
BACH: It's just alarming that we have gotten to a point where, you know, any treatment that is a product of this collective scientific enterprise that has grown out of the Human Genome Project that was publicly funded has now been captured by a single drug company and is now going to turn around and charge potentially millions.
STEIN: Bach says it's just the most extreme example of how drug prices are draining resources from society.
BACH: We have been slowly subjected to price increases the same way the frog in the boiling water, you know, is slowly boiled to death.
STEIN: Now, Lennon acknowledges the price might seem shocking. But he argues it's worth it. The only existing treatment for spinal muscular atrophy costs hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, and this will hopefully be a one-time, lifesaving treatment that will last a lifetime.
LENNON: What we're talking about and we have to remember is we're talking about a lifetime of benefit being condensed down into a one-time treatment. We're not used to thinking about this that way. We're used to a system of chronic18 medication where we spread costs out over years, if not decades.
STEIN: Drug companies need to be able to recoup the costs of developing lifesaving, cutting-edge treatments, Lennon says, if they're going to be encouraged to find new breakthroughs. Donovan's parents didn't have to pay because their son was part of a research study, but they think the treatment is worth the price.
WEISGARBER: Giving someone a life, someone that would have died in infancy19 or early childhood the opportunity to live into adulthood20, I mean, I don't know. I think that's valuable. I think it's a valuable investment.
STEIN: Rob Stein, NPR News.
1 devastating | |
adj.毁灭性的,令人震惊的,强有力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 gene | |
n.遗传因子,基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 genetic | |
adj.遗传的,遗传学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 fussy | |
adj.为琐事担忧的,过分装饰的,爱挑剔的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 spinal | |
adj.针的,尖刺的,尖刺状突起的;adj.脊骨的,脊髓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 atrophy | |
n./v.萎缩,虚脱,衰退 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 devastated | |
v.彻底破坏( devastate的过去式和过去分词);摧毁;毁灭;在感情上(精神上、财务上等)压垮adj.毁坏的;极为震惊的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 defective | |
adj.有毛病的,有问题的,有瑕疵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 genetically | |
adv.遗传上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 genes | |
n.基因( gene的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 jaws | |
n.口部;嘴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 stunning | |
adj.极好的;使人晕倒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 chronic | |
adj.(疾病)长期未愈的,慢性的;极坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 infancy | |
n.婴儿期;幼年期;初期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 adulthood | |
n.成年,成人期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|