-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
The U.S. Supreme1 Court ruled this morning that a 40-foot cross in the state of Maryland on public land can stay. Here's the backstory. The cross was built in 1925 and has served as a World War I memorial for almost a hundred years. Bereaved2 mothers in Bladensburg, Md., decided3 to build the memorial to honor their fallen sons. When they ran out of money, the American Legion took over the project.
But by the 1930s, a local parks commission had taken over the war memorial and the responsibility for its maintenance, but that meant taxpayer4 money was going to that maintenance. A lower court ruled the cross was unconstitutional. Today, though, the Supreme Court reversed that ruling. NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg is at the Supreme Court and joins us now.
Good morning, Nina.
NINA TOTENBERG, BYLINE5: Good morning, Rachel.
MARTIN: Explain what you know of the court's decision.
TOTENBERG: Well, the American Humanist Association wanted the cross moved to private land and funded privately6, and the court said it didn't have to do that. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for a seven-justice majority in this case. And he began by summarizing what happened in World War II, how soldiers buried there, they put a cross on them. And they also put Stars of David. But the image that parents had in their mind and spouses7 had in their mind were these rows and rows of crosses. And he said that, therefore, it is not only a Christian8 symbol. He said the fact that the cross is undoubtedly10 a Christian symbol should not blind one to everything else that the Bladensburg cross has come to represent - a symbolic11 resting place for ancestors who never returned home, a place for the community to gather and honor all veterans and their sacrifices for this nation and a historical landmark12. For many, he said, destroying or defacing the cross or moving it would not be a neutral act and would not further the ideals of respect and tolerance13 embodied14 in the First Amendment15 guaranteed of protection of religion.
So that was his decision for the court - speaking for the court majority, but not everybody agreed with everything that he wrote.
MARTIN: Right. And they made that clear because I understand there was an exceptional amount of writing associated with this case.
TOTENBERG: Yeah. There were six - I think, six separate concurring16 opinions. Justices Thomas and Gorsuch didn't agree with almost anything that Alito said. They agreed with the bottom line, but Thomas said he doesn't think the First Amendment protection for religion - for religious neutrality applies to states. And Gorsuch said he thought the whole case should've been dismissed because the American Humanist Association didn't have standing17 to challenge this.
But the others did - and they have - I think there's - I haven't counted up, but I think there's probably more than a hundred pages of writing in this. But essentially18, I think they agree - everybody agreed with the bottom line; that it's too late to go back and undo9 these kinds of very special kinds of monuments that are - that have a religious symbol.
MARTIN: You mentioned the dissenters20, Justice Ginsburg and Sotomayor. Did they have anything notable to say here?
TOTENBERG: Well, Ginsburg actually gave her dissent19 from the bench, which is a mark that you really care about this, that you think this is important. And she said that the court today erodes21 the neutrality principle that we've had in the past, diminishing precedent22 that serves to preserve that neutrality. The Latin cross is the foremost symbol of the Christian faith, she said, embodying23 the central theological claim of Christianity, that the son of God died on the cross, that he rose from the dead and that his death and resurrection offer the possibility of eternal life. It's not emblematic24 of any other faith. And by maintaining this cross on a public highway, the state places Christianity above other faiths and conveys a message of exclusion25 to non-Christians - nearly 30% of the U.S. population - telling them they are outsiders, not full members of the political community.
MARTIN: Lastly, Nina, I mean, what does this ruling mean practically speaking? Can someone just put up a cross on public land now?
TOTENBERG: I think not. I think this is an opinion that the majority of the court agreed with. And not just five members of the court, but seven members of the Court ultimately said this - upheld this. And it's based on history and tradition and seeing some sort of a difference between the Latin cross as a Christian symbol versus26 the Latin cross as a symbol of the dead.
MARTIN: NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg.
Thank you so much.
TOTENBERG: Thank you.
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 bereaved | |
adj.刚刚丧失亲人的v.使失去(希望、生命等)( bereave的过去式和过去分词);(尤指死亡)使丧失(亲人、朋友等);使孤寂;抢走(财物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 taxpayer | |
n.纳税人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 privately | |
adv.以私人的身份,悄悄地,私下地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 spouses | |
n.配偶,夫或妻( spouse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 undo | |
vt.解开,松开;取消,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 symbolic | |
adj.象征性的,符号的,象征主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 landmark | |
n.陆标,划时代的事,地界标 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 tolerance | |
n.宽容;容忍,忍受;耐药力;公差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 embodied | |
v.表现( embody的过去式和过去分词 );象征;包括;包含 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 concurring | |
同时发生的,并发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 dissenters | |
n.持异议者,持不同意见者( dissenter的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 erodes | |
侵蚀,腐蚀( erode的第三人称单数 ); 逐渐毁坏,削弱,损害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 precedent | |
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 embodying | |
v.表现( embody的现在分词 );象征;包括;包含 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 emblematic | |
adj.象征的,可当标志的;象征性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 exclusion | |
n.拒绝,排除,排斥,远足,远途旅行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 versus | |
prep.以…为对手,对;与…相比之下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|