-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
This is Scientific Americans 60 Second Science, I'm Karen Hopkin
As voters vacillate among the contenders for the Republican nomination1, it may matter less what the candidates say than how they sound when they say it. Because a new study shows that voters are more likely to prefer the candidate with the deeper voice.
Previous studies have suggested that voters might go for the baritone over the tenor2. But those experiments used recordings3 of former U.S. presidents, which meant that volunteer listeners might have recognized the speakers and voted along party lines.
In this study, researchers played subjects a pair of anonymous4 voices and asked which they would elect: “I urge you to vote for me this November” or “I urge you to vote for me this November.”
Okay, the recordings they used were no doubt less comical. But voters went with the overnight DJ hands down, results that appear in the Proceedings5 of the Royal Society B.
So why do we tend to electOrson Welles over Pee Wee Herman? Deep voices may strike some primal6 chord, giving the impression of strength and competence7. So candidates take heed8: it’s great to wave the stars and stripes, but what’s really key is your set of pipes.
Thanks for the minute for Scientific Americans 60 second Science, I'm Karen Hopkin. "vote for me"
点击收听单词发音
1 nomination | |
n.提名,任命,提名权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 tenor | |
n.男高音(歌手),次中音(乐器),要旨,大意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 recordings | |
n.记录( recording的名词复数 );录音;录像;唱片 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 anonymous | |
adj.无名的;匿名的;无特色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 primal | |
adj.原始的;最重要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 competence | |
n.能力,胜任,称职 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 heed | |
v.注意,留意;n.注意,留心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|