-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Robyn Williams: And this is The Science Show on RN where we’ve long tracked the evolution of dogs. Now clearly going far further back than we thought, so we can imagine now a bunch of feral people, all very rough—roaming around the woods, coming across a group of bright, civilised canines1. And being adopted by them. The dogs domesticated3 us. Any chance? Olivia Willis reports.
Olivia Willis: It’s the evolution debate that’s divided the scientific community for decades: dogs, where they come from and how they came to be, has largely remained a mystery. But researchers in Sweden may have finally cracked the code. With the report released last month showing that human domestication4 of dogs is twice as old as previously5 thought. The paper, published in Current Biology, has found that dogs split from wolves at least 27,000 years ago, and possibly up to 40,000 years ago. 40,000, it’s astonishing really, when you consider that the conventional domestication of most animals—say goats or cattle—happened just 10 to 12,000 years ago.
The new findings were based on a bone fragment found in Siberia, and revealed a new species of wolf that was a side branch of the common ancestor of modern wolves and dogs. Scientists compared the differences between the genome of the ancient wolf and those of modern wolves and dogs, and built a family tree showing the two had split much earlier than previously thought. However the study, while impressive, wasn’t able to conclude much about the domestication process itself. Understanding where, when, and exactly how humans developed a close companionship with what are otherwise wild and fierce creatures, remains6 a hotly contested bone of contention7. Early signs of domestication emerged in the late 1970s when scientists in northern Israel discovered a puppy buried in the arms of a human under a 12,000-year-old home, suggesting that dogs were domesticated in the Middle East, shortly before people took up farming.
But it wasn’t long before other evidence suggested domestication took place in Asia, or even Europe. It was Peter Savolainen, a Swedish professor of evolutionary8 genetics, who created the world’s first canine2 DNA10 database. He conducted a study that examined DNA sequence variation among 654 domestic dogs. Through his research, Savolainen began to recognise a pattern that eastern Asian dogs were more genetically11 diverse, a trademark12 of ancient origins. Further study in 2009 led Savolainen to conclude that dogs had originated from a region south of China’s Yangtze River, less than 16,500 years ago, when humans were transitioning from hunters and gatherers, to farming and agriculture. Although his team couldn’t decipher just how or why they’d been domesticated, Savolainen was confident that he’d solved the basic canine question. But not everybody was convinced. Robert Wayne, and evolutionary biologist at the University of California, believes that Savolainen’s approach of using only modern DNA is a gross oversight13.
Wayne says that any genetic9 diversity in modern Asian dogs—the crux14 of Savolainen’s theory—is not necessarily an indication of ancient origins, but rather a result of human colonisation, as dogs regularly interbred with wolves and canines from other regions. Wayne instead focused his attention on ancient DNA, and in 2013 his team published the most extensive analysis of ancient dog and wolf genomes to date, and concluded that dogs had evolved from an ancient group of wolves in Europe. Somewhere between 19 and 32,000 years ago. So the mystery of dog domestication remained, that’s when scientists Greger Larson and Keith Dobney stepped in and things got even more interesting. Larson and Dobney had grown frustrated15 over the continued disputes about canine origins because no studies—especially those of Savolainen and Wayne—were combining both ancient and modern DNA and using a broad range of geographic16 samples.
So Larson and Dobney set to work, attempting to analyse as many samples as possible, from as many places as possible. Combining ancient DNA analysis, with modern techniques. So far they’ve analysed more than 3,000 specimens17, and their first and highly anticipated paper is due to be published in coming months. They hope to finally determine when and where wolves transitioned from wild animals of the forest to man’s beloved, best friend.
Robyn Williams: More than 40,000 years ago, I’ll bet you. Olivia Willis on the story reported in The New Scientist this week on page 12, and is the cover story of the journal Science, on 17th of April. And so for the rest of The Science Show, big data: computers, and later, dating. For first we go way back.
点击收听单词发音
1 canines | |
n.犬齿( canine的名词复数 );犬牙;犬科动物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 canine | |
adj.犬的,犬科的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 domesticated | |
adj.喜欢家庭生活的;(指动物)被驯养了的v.驯化( domesticate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 domestication | |
n.驯养,驯化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 contention | |
n.争论,争辩,论战;论点,主张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 evolutionary | |
adj.进化的;演化的,演变的;[生]进化论的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 genetic | |
adj.遗传的,遗传学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 DNA | |
(缩)deoxyribonucleic acid 脱氧核糖核酸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 genetically | |
adv.遗传上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 trademark | |
n.商标;特征;vt.注册的…商标 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 crux | |
adj.十字形;难事,关键,最重要点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 frustrated | |
adj.挫败的,失意的,泄气的v.使不成功( frustrate的过去式和过去分词 );挫败;使受挫折;令人沮丧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 geographic | |
adj.地理学的,地理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 specimens | |
n.样品( specimen的名词复数 );范例;(化验的)抽样;某种类型的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|