-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
"To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical1 and moral standards."Whether successful leadership requires that a leader follow high ethical and moral standards is a complex issue--one that is fraught2 with the problems of defining ethics3, morality, and successful leadership in the first place. In addressing the issue it is helpful to consider in turn three distinct forms of leadership: business, political, and social-spiritual.
In the business realm, successful leadership is generally defined as that which achieves the goal of profit maximization for a firm's shareholders4 or other owners. Moreover, the prevailing5 view in Western corporate6 culture is that by maximizing profits a business leader fulfills7 his or her highest moral or ethical obligation. Many disagree, however, that these two obligations are the same. Some detractors claim, for example, that business leaders have a duty to do no intentional8 harm to their customers or to the society in which they operate--for example, by providing safe products and by implementing9 pollution control measures. Other detractors go further--to impose on business leaders an affirmative obligation to protect consumers, preserve the natural environment, promote education, and otherwise take steps to help alleviate10 society's problems.
Whether our most successful business leaders are the ones who embrace these additional obligations depends, of course, on one's own definition of business success. In my observation, as business leaders become subject to closer scrutiny11 by the media and by social activists12, business leaders will maximize profits in the long term only by taking reasonable steps to minimize the social and environmental harm their businesses cause. This observation also accords with my personal view of a business leader's ethical and moral obligation.
In the political realm the issue is no less complex. Definitions of successful political leadership and of ethical or moral leadership are tied up in the means a leader uses to wield13 his or her power and to obtain that power in the first place. One useful approach is to draw a distinction between personal morality and public morality. In my observation personal morality is unrelated to effective political leadership. Modern politics is replete14 with examples of what most people would consider personal ethical failings: the marital15 indiscretions of President Kennedy, for instance. Yet few would disagree that these personal moral choices adversely16 affected17 his ability to lead.
In contrast, pubhc morality and successful leadership are more closely connected. Consider the many leaders, such as Stalin and Hitler, whom most people would agree were egregious18 violators of public morality. Ultimately such leaders forfeit19 their leadership as a result of the immoral20 means by which they obtained or wielded21 their power. Or consider less egregious examples such as President Nixon, whose contempt for the very legal system that afforded him his leadership led to his forfeiture22 of it. It seems that in the short term unethical publicbehavior might serve a political leader's interest in preserving his or her power; yet in the long term such behavior invariably results in that leader's down- fall that is, in failure.
One must also consider a third type of leadership: social-spiritual. Consider notable figures such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King, whom few would disagree were eminently23 successful in leading others to practice the high ethical and moral standards which they advocated. However, I would be hard-pressed to name one successful social or spiritual leader whose leadership was predicated on the advocacy of patently unethical or immoral behavior. The reason for this is simple: high standards for one's own public morality are prerequisites24 for successful social-spiritual leadership.
In sum, history informs us that effective political and social-spiritual leadership requires adherence25 to high standards of public morality. However, when it comes to business leadership the relationship is less clear; successful business leaders must strike a balance between achieving profit maximization and fulfilling their broader obligation to the society, which comes with the burden of such leadership.
点击收听单词发音
1 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 fraught | |
adj.充满…的,伴有(危险等)的;忧虑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 shareholders | |
n.股东( shareholder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 prevailing | |
adj.盛行的;占优势的;主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 fulfills | |
v.履行(诺言等)( fulfill的第三人称单数 );执行(命令等);达到(目的);使结束 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 intentional | |
adj.故意的,有意(识)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 implementing | |
v.实现( implement的现在分词 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 alleviate | |
v.减轻,缓和,缓解(痛苦等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 activists | |
n.(政治活动的)积极分子,活动家( activist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 wield | |
vt.行使,运用,支配;挥,使用(武器等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 replete | |
adj.饱满的,塞满的;n.贮蜜蚁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 marital | |
adj.婚姻的,夫妻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 adversely | |
ad.有害地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 egregious | |
adj.非常的,过分的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 forfeit | |
vt.丧失;n.罚金,罚款,没收物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 immoral | |
adj.不道德的,淫荡的,荒淫的,有伤风化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 wielded | |
手持着使用(武器、工具等)( wield的过去式和过去分词 ); 具有; 运用(权力); 施加(影响) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 forfeiture | |
n.(名誉等)丧失 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 eminently | |
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 prerequisites | |
先决条件,前提( prerequisite的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 adherence | |
n.信奉,依附,坚持,固着 | |
参考例句: |
|
|