英伦广角 2011-10-22 杰克逊案调查者竟然犯错？（在线收听） |
For 7 days of this trial, Conrad Murray has been on the receiving end of evidence that he killed Michael Jackson. Day-8 finally saw his defense team fight back. Conrad’s investigator Elisa Fleak had already told the court she found countless drugs including Propofol the one killed the star stashed in the cupboard. But on the cross examination she admitted that in Jackson’s bedroom she failed to note things, moved pieces of evidence and even left her thumb print on one. "The scene notes that the reflected the evidence that was there on the day that Michael Jackson died, you destroyed."
"Right, I do that in all my cases."
"Miss Fleak, would you agree with me that you made substantial number of mistakes in your investigation of this case?"
"No."
"You will. Would you agree with me that if you don't take notes, you don't keep your notes? That’s bad investigation, that's bad investigator work, would you agree?"
"No."
"Why do you think you take notes? Miss Fleak."
"To write the reports."
"Well, what about later when you have to testify, you have to refresh your recollection."
"You then have your report to read off of."
"So your report is completely thorough?"
"At that time, yes."
Raising doubts is all the defense needs to do. They say it was Jackson himself to blame for his death as he sought sleep during rehearsals for his concert in London.
The court was told that only one finger print was found on the bottle of Propofol they are focusing on, and that belonged to Conrad Murray.
Tests showed the surgical anesthetic what Jackson called his sleep milk was found in his blood, urine, liver, stomach even the fluid behind his eyes. How it got there is the question. The medical evidence was protracted and clearly hard-going for many in court, and what killed Michael Jackson is not an issue here, it's whether Dr. Murray was responsible.
Greg Milam, Sky News, Los Angeles. |
| 原文地址：http://www.tingroom.com/lesson/yinglunguangjiao/214582.html |