This morning a nearly unprecedented move by clear-outs. Prince Charles's camp is very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial book born to be king, calling some of the claims such as that he is decided he will be an active monoarch, illing forms of speculation in a letter published in the Times of London.

 

I think this is an impressive book by Prince Charles's  chief staff shows by issuing his letter the prince is pretty serious about the claims that have been made about him. 

 

The book has ignited a fire storm dropping the bombshop Charles has caught on fit on the eve of wedding to Diana, and nearly bcked out and while he is a proud father, he is also at moments of jealousy toward his two sons. 

 

Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him, his sons and his shining duetch loop really attract, but as the author critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England.

   

That prompted the response from the Prince Camp. Responding to Amir's claim is that his active style may be at odds. With his role to remain neutral like his mother. Prince's chief staff Rice has real highness always prefered not to comment on such matters. But after a half century in public life, few could be better placed to understand necessary and proper limitations on the role. 

 

He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 years of prince well, he knows what is expeccted from him, he knows the limitation of the role.  

 

And the controvercy is about to go across the continental, "Born to be king" will be published in the U.S. on Feburary 17th. 

 

So a lot people taking about this, I know you will all be wondering. Just so you know, the prince's mother *** has been the second on the throne since 1952.