驼背男人08（在线收听）

Holmes pulled a large sheet of tissue-paper out of his pocket and carefully unfolded it upon his knee.

“What do you make of that?” he asked.

The paper was covered with the tracings of the foot-marks of some small animal. It had five well-marked foot-pads, an indication of long nails, and the whole print might be nearly as large as a dessert-spoon.

“It's a dog,” said I.

“Did you ever hear of a dog running up a curtain? I found distinct traces that this creature had done so.”

“A monkey, then?”

“But it is not the print of a monkey.”

“What can it be, then?”

“Neither dog nor cat nor monkey nor any creature that we are familiar with. I have tried to reconstruct it from the measurements. Here are four prints where the beast has been standing motionless. You see that it is no less than fifteen inches from fore-foot to hind. Add to that the length of neck and head, and you get a creature not much less than two feet long—probably more if there is any tail. But now observe this other measurement. The animal has been moving, and we have the length of its stride. In each case it is only about three inches. You have an indication, you see, of a long body with very short legs attached to it. It has not been considerate enough to leave any of its hair behind it. But its general shape must be what I have indicated, and it can run up a curtain, and it is carnivorous.”

“How do you deduce that?”

“Because it ran up the curtain. A canary's cage was hanging in the window, and its aim seems to have been to get at the bird.”

“Then what was the beast?”

“Ah, if I could give it a name it might go a long way towards solving the case. On the whole, it was probably some creature of the weasel and stoat tribe—and yet it is larger than any of these that I have seen.”

“But what had it to do with the crime?”

“That, also, is still obscure. But we have learned a good deal, you perceive. We know that a man stood in the road looking at the quarrel between the Barclays—the blinds were up and the room lighted. We know, also, that he ran across the lawn, entered the room, accompanied by a strange animal, and that he either struck the Colonel or, as is equally possible, that the Colonel fell down from sheer fright at the sight of him, and cut his head on the corner of the fender. Finally, we have the curious fact that the intruder carried away the key with him when he left.”

“Your discoveries seem to have left the business more obscure that it was before,” said I.

“Quite so. They undoubtedly showed that the affair was much deeper than was at first conjectured. I thought the matter over, and I came to the conclusion that I must approach the case from another aspect. But really, Watson, I am keeping you up, and I might just as well tell you all this on our way to Aldershot to-morrow.”

福尔摩斯从他口袋里取出一大张薄纸来，小心翼翼地在他的膝盖上摊开。

“你看这里什么？”福尔摩斯问道。

纸上是一种小动物的爪印。有五个很清楚的爪指，很长的爪尖，整个痕迹大小象一个点心匙。

“这是一条狗，”我说道。

“你听说过一条狗一爬上窗帘的事吗？可我在窗帘上发现了这个动物爬上去的清楚的痕迹。”

“那么，是一只猴子？”

“可是这不是猴子的爪印。”

“那么，是什么呢？”

“既不是狗，不是猫，不是猴子，也不是我们熟悉的别的什么东西。我曾经设法从爪印的大小描画出这个动物的形象。

这是它站着不动时的四个爪印。你看，从前瓜到后爪的距离，至少有十五英寸。再加上头和颈部的长度，你就可以得出这动物至少长二英尺，如果有尾巴，那也可能还要长些。不过现在再来看看另外的尺寸。这个动物曾经走动过，我们量出了它走一步的距离，每一步只有三英寸左右。你就可以知道，这东西身一体很长，腿很短。这东西虽没有留下什么一毛一来，但它的大致形状，一定和我所说的一样，它能爬上窗帘，这是一种食肉动物。”

“你是怎么推断出来的呢？”

“因为窗户上挂着一只金丝雀笼子，它爬到窗帘上，似乎是要攫取那只鸟。”

“那么，它究竟是什么兽类呢？”

“啊，如果我能说出它的名字，那就太有助于破案了。总的说来，这可能是什么鼬鼠之类的东西，不过比我曾经见过的那些要大得多。”

“但这与这件罪案有什么关系呢？”

“这一点也还没有弄清楚。可是，你可以看出，我们已经知道了不少情况。我们知道，因为窗帘没拉上，屋里亮着灯，有一个人曾经站在大路上，看到巴克利夫妇在争吵。我们还知道，他带着一只奇怪的动物，跑过了草坪，走进屋内，也可能是他打了上校，也很可能是上校看到他以后，吓得跌倒了，他的头就在炉角上撞破了。最后，我们还知道一个奇怪的事实，就是这位闯入者在离开时，把钥匙随身带走了。”

“你的这些发现，似乎把事情搞得比以前更加混乱了，”我说道。

“不错，这些情况确实说明，这件案子比最初设想的更复杂了。我把这件事仔细想了想，得出的结论是，我必须从另一方面去探索这件案子。不过，华生，我耽误你睡觉了，明天在我们去奥尔德肖特的路上，我可以把剩下的情况详详细细地告诉你。”