1-19（在线收听）

19.

I didn’t think it could get worse. What a grievous mistake it is for a member of the Royal Family,when considering the media, to imagine that things can’t get worse. Weeks later the samenewspaper put me on the front page again.

HARRY’S HAD AN ACCIDENT.

I’d broken a bone in my thumb playing rugby, no big deal, but the paper decided to make outthat I was on life support. Bad taste, under any circumstances, but a little more than a year afterMummy’s alleged accident?

C’mon, fellas.

I’d dealt with the British press all my life, but they’d never before singled me out. In fact,since Mummy’s death an unspoken agreement had governed press treatment of both her sons, andthe agreement went like this: Lay off.

Let them have their education in peace.

Apparently that agreement had now expired, because there I was, splattered across the frontpage, made out to seem a delicate flower. Or an ass. Or both.

And knocking on death’s door.

I read the article several times. Despite the somber subtext—something’s very wrong withPrince Harry—I marveled at its tone: larky. My existence was just fun and games to these people.

I wasn’t a human being to them. I wasn’t a fourteen-year-old boy hanging on by his fingernails. Iwas a cartoon character, a glove puppet to be manipulated and mocked for fun. So what if theirfun made my already difficult days more difficult, made me a laughingstock before myschoolmates, not to mention the wider world? So what if they were torturing a child? All wasjustified because I was royal, and in their minds royal was synonymous with non-person. Centuriesago royal men and women were considered divine; now they were insects. What fun, to plucktheir wings.

Pa’s office lodged a formal complaint, publicly demanded an apology, accused the paper ofbullying his younger son.

The newspaper told Pa’s office to sod off.

Before trying to move on with my life I took one last look at the article. Of all the things thatsurprised me about it, the truly flabbergasting thing was the absolutely shitty writing. I was a poorstudent, a dreadful writer, and yet I had enough education to recognize that this right here was amaster class in illiteracy.

To take one example: After explaining that I’d been grievously injured, that I was nearly atdeath’s door, the article went on to caution breathlessly that the exact nature of my injury couldn’tbe revealed because the Royal Family had forbidden the editors to do so. (As if my family had anycontrol over these ghouls.) “To reassure you, we can say that Harry’s injuries are NOT serious.

But the accident was considered grave enough for him to be taken to hospital. But we believe youare entitled to know if an heir to the throne is involved in any accident, however small, if it resultsin injury.”

The two “buts” in a row, the smug self-regard, the lack of coherence and absence of any realpoint, the hysterical nothingness of it all. This dog’s dinner of a paragraph was said to be edited—or, more likely, written—by a young journalist whose name I scanned and then quickly forgot.

I didn’t think I’d ever run across it, or him, again. The way he wrote? I couldn’t imagine he’dbe a working journalist much longer.