-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
IN THE NEWS - California Ruling Opens New Front in Fight Over Same-Sex Marriage
A ban is overturned in the nation's largest state. Also, in another civil rights case, a federal court rules that America's paper money discriminates1 against the blind. Transcript2 of radio broadcast:
23 May 2008
This is IN THE NEWS in VOA Special English.
Two recent court rulings in the United States could have national effects on civil rights issues.
Same-sex partners Stuart Gaffney, left, and John Lewis, second from left, celebrate the California Supreme3 Court's decision in their case in front of San Francisco's court house |
Last week the California Supreme Court rejected that state’s ban on same-sex marriage. A four-to-three majority ruled that same-sex couples have a right to marry under the California Constitution.
Couples from anywhere in the country could get married in the nation's largest state as early as the middle of June. In most cases, however, their marriage would not be recognized back home. The only state where homosexuals can now marry is Massachusetts, and they have to be living there.
Californians will likely vote in November on a proposal to amend4 their constitution to ban same-sex marriage. Conservative groups want the court to delay its decision until after the elections.
Douglas Kmiec is a constitutional law professor at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California. He predicts that courts in other states will now be faced with similar questions. The issue could end up before the United States Supreme Court.
It could also enter into the presidential campaign. The major candidates -- Democrats5 Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and Republican John McCain -- are all against same-sex marriage. But senators Obama and Clinton support civil unions.
Same-sex marriage is legal in Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, South Africa and Spain.
Mitch Pomerantz, president of the American Council of the Blind, shows the similarity between four different kinds of American bills |
The second ruling came this week from a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. It found that America's paper money discriminates against blind people. Bills of different dollar amounts all have the same size and feel, so there is no way to tell them apart by touch.
A panel of three judges voted two-to-one that the government must do something to change its bills. The court agreed with a lower court judge who ruled in two thousand six that redesigning paper money would not be too costly6.
The government says it would be. Millions of machines that accept bills would also have to change.
Yet that lower court judge said the United States was the only country to print bills all the same size and color.
More than one million Americans are blind. Millions more have limited vision.
The American Council of the Blind brought the case in two thousand two to seek bills of different sizes or with raised marks.
Many blind people welcomed this week's ruling, but not all. The National Federation7 of the Blind says it could strengthen misbeliefs about blind people being helpless. It says there are greater needs, like more Braille education and job training.
The government could now ask for a hearing by the full thirteen-member court, which includes a blind judge. Or it could appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Treasury8 Department says it is exploring ways to help people who are blind or have limited vision. A five-dollar bill released earlier this year has an extra large numeral five on it.
And that's IN THE NEWS in VOA Special English, written by Brianna Blake. I’m Steve Ember.
1 discriminates | |
分别,辨别,区分( discriminate的第三人称单数 ); 歧视,有差别地对待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 amend | |
vt.修改,修订,改进;n.[pl.]赔罪,赔偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 costly | |
adj.昂贵的,价值高的,豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 federation | |
n.同盟,联邦,联合,联盟,联合会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|