-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Progress Made in Identification, Prevention of Brain Diseases
Scientists are close to reaching a long-sought goal – a blood test to identify possible signs of Alzheimer’s and other diseases of the brain.
This comes as a recent large study shows healthy behavior can cut a person’s risk of developing such conditions, even if they have genes2 that raise that risk.
At the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference on July 15, six research groups presented new results on several experimental tests. This included one that appears to be 88 percent accurate at identifying Alzheimer’s risk.
Doctors are hoping for something to use during regular exams that can measure most signs of brain-destroying diseases. They could make better decisions about which patients need additional testing. Current tools such as brain scans and spinal3 fluid tests are too costly4 or difficult to do during regular meetings with patients.
“We need something quicker … It doesn’t have to be perfect” to be useful, said Maria Carrillo, chief science officer for the Alzheimer’s Association.
Richard Hodes is director of the National Institute on Aging. He called the new results “very promising5.” He said blood tests soon will be used to choose and observe people for federally-supported studies.
“This has happened … far faster than any of us would have expected,” he told the Associated Press.
It cannot come too soon for patients like 66-year-old Tom Doyle. The former university professor from Chicago first experienced memory problems four years ago. He has had two spinal fluid tests since then.
First he was told he did not have Alzheimer’s. Later he was told that he did have it. Over time, doctors discovered Doyle suffered from different dementia-linked diseases — Lewy body and Parkinson’s.
“They probably could have diagnosed me years ago accurately6 if they had had a blood test,” said Doyle. He represents patients on the Alzheimer’s Association’s leadership team.
About 50 million people worldwide have the brain disease known as dementia. Alzheimer’s is the most common kind. There is no cure. Current medicines just temporarily ease its harmful effects. Many hoped-for treatments have failed. Doctors think past studies may have included people at too late a stage in the disease, when brain damage was already severe. The experts also say the research may have included too many people with problems other than Alzheimer’s.
A blood test — rather than subjective7 estimates of thinking skills — could get the right people into the right studies sooner.
One of the experimental blood tests measures unusual kinds of the protein that forms plaque8 in the brain. Plaque is a major sign of Alzheimer’s. Last year, Japanese researchers published a study of it. At the conference they gave results from additional testing on 201 people with Alzheimer’s or other types of dementia.
Akinori Nakamura is with the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology in Obu, Japan. He said the test correctly identified 92 percent of people who had Alzheimer’s and 85 percent who did not.
Another experimental test looks at neurofilament light, a protein that is a marker of nerve damage. Abdul Hye of King’s College London gave results of a study comparing blood levels in 2,300 people with several different brain diseases, including dementias, depression, Parkinson’s and multiple sclerosis. The study also included healthy people for comparison.
Eight of the diseases were linked to much higher levels of neurofilament light. The test cannot show which disorder9 someone might have. But it may help them rule out disorders10 in a patient.
Randall Bateman of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis also helped develop a blood test that measures the Alzheimer’s protein. His work is supported by the United States government and the Alzheimer’s Association.
“Everyone’s finding the same thing ... the results are remarkably11 similar across countries, across techniques,” said Bateman. He estimates a test could be as close as three years away.
Recent progress in dealing12 with conditions like Alzheimer’s has not been limited to treatment.
Researchers at the conference also presented a new study about prevention of these diseases. The study also appeared in the scientific publication the Journal of the American Medical Association.
It showed that people with high genetic13 risk and poor health habits were about three times more likely to develop dementia than those with low genetic risk and good habits. And, with any level of genetic risk, a good diet, regular exercise, limited alcohol use and no tobacco use made dementia less likely.
Elzbieta Kuzma and her team at the University of Exeter Medical School in England used the UK Biobank to study nearly 200,000 people age 60 or older with no signs of dementia. Subjects were identified as high, medium or low dementia risk based on genetic mutations. The study subjects were grouped also by lifestyle factors.
After about eight years of observation, 1.8 percent of those with high genetic risk and unhealthy behavior had developed dementia. A little over half of a percent of the people with low genetic risk and healthy habits had the disease.
John Haaga of the National Institute on Aging says the study results are good news.
“No one can guarantee you’ll escape this … disease” but clean living can improve your chances, Haaga said.
One limitation of the study is that researchers only had information on mutations affecting people of European ancestry14.
The results should ease fears that gene1 mutations alone decide one’s brain health, said Rudy Tanzi, a genetics expert at Massachusetts General Hospital. Less than 5 percent of the mutations tied to Alzheimer’s are “fully penetrant,” meaning that they guarantee a person will get the disease, he said.
“That means that with 95 percent of the mutations, your lifestyle will make a difference,” Tanzi said. “Don’t be too worried about your genetics. Spend more time being mindful of living a healthy life.”
I’m Dorothy Gundy.
And I’m Pete Musto.
Words in This Story
accurate – adj. free from mistakes or errors
regular – adv. happening at times that are equally separated
scan(s) – n. the act or process of using a special machine to see the inside of something such as a part of the body
spinal – adj. of, relating to, or affecting the line of connected bones down the middle of the back
diagnose(d) – v. to recognize a disease or illness in someone
subjective – adj. based on feelings or opinions rather than facts
plaque – n. a change in brain tissue that occurs in Alzheimer's disease
habit(s) – n. a usual way of behaving
mutation(s) – n. a change in the genes of a plant or animal that causes physical characteristics that are different from what is normal
factor(s) – n. something that helps produce or influence a result
1 gene | |
n.遗传因子,基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 genes | |
n.基因( gene的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 spinal | |
adj.针的,尖刺的,尖刺状突起的;adj.脊骨的,脊髓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 costly | |
adj.昂贵的,价值高的,豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 promising | |
adj.有希望的,有前途的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 accurately | |
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 subjective | |
a.主观(上)的,个人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 plaque | |
n.饰板,匾,(医)血小板 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 disorders | |
n.混乱( disorder的名词复数 );凌乱;骚乱;(身心、机能)失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 remarkably | |
ad.不同寻常地,相当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 genetic | |
adj.遗传的,遗传学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 ancestry | |
n.祖先,家世 | |
参考例句: |
|
|