-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A discrimination case involving Asian Americans at a top public high school in the state of Virginia is moving ahead.
A federal judge in late May ruled that a parents' group can dispute the admissions policy of the high school in court. The group says the new admissions policy is meant to limit the number of ethnically2 Asian students at the school.
Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, commonly called TJ, is in Alexandria, Virginia. It is part of the Fairfax County School system. TJ was rated the best public high school in America last month by the magazine U.S. News and World Report.
However, the school accepts very few Black and Hispanic students. This year, a small percentage of students at TJ are Black or Hispanic. However, about 70 percent of students are identified as Asian. Government information shows that Asians make up about 20 percent of the population of Fairfax County.
Last year, the Fairfax County School Board changed the admissions process at the school. Before the change, acceptance to the highly competitive3 school was based mainly on grades and test scores.
The board said it decided4 to change the process to judge students holistically5. That means to consider many different qualities of a person rather than a few. A difficult admissions test is no longer required. Critics of the earlier system argued that it gave an advantage to families that could pay for test preparation classes.
Now, any eighth grade student with a 3.5 grade point average or above can apply to TJ. Instead of an exam, students write an essay. Students are judged based on a "portrait," which considers things like a student's economic situation and whether they come from a home where English is not the main language. Seats are also guaranteed to the top 1.5 percent of students at any of the county's middle schools.
Fairfax Schools Superintendent6 Scott Brabrand led the push for the changes at the high school. Officials say the new admissions policies are not affected7 by race.
"We have heard from many members of the TJ community—current and former—who have raised concerns about diversity at the school," Brabrand said to the board last year. "TJ must reflect the diversity...of Fairfax County Public Schools."
A group, including several Asian families, brought legal action soon after the school board announced the changes. The case argues that the new admissions rules are meant to lower the number of Asian students. The group calls itself the Coalition8 for TJ. It is receiving legal help from the Pacific Legal Foundation, PLF, a nonprofit legal organization.
PLF lawyer Erin Wilcox is representing the families. She said in a statement, "TJ's attempts at racial balancing are not only illegal, but they also harm the children they're supposedly trying to help." She said the school board is barred from choosing who can attend public school based on a person's race or ethnic1 group.
The TJ admissions legal case is similar to debates at other schools around the country. Often, there are few Black and Hispanic students at top public high schools. Students that attend these competitive schools are more likely to do well on SATs and other exams and attend good universities.
Stuyvesant High School is a top public high school in New York City. Similar to TJ, almost three of four students at Stuyvesant are Asian. The New York Times reported that only eight Black students out of 759 were admitted into the first-year class for 2021.
And in the San Francisco Unified9 School District, 34 percent of students are Black or Hispanic. But at Lowell High School, one of San Francisco's top public schools, 13 percent of students are Black or Hispanic.
A study published last year said that diversity can be good for students, both educationally and socially. Research from the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., suggests that Black students perform better on standardized10 tests if they go to schools with more white students.
But in the Virginia case, parents argue that the school district's policies to support racial minorities hurt a racial minority—Asian Americans.
The debate may partly be answered in the U.S. Supreme11 Court before the end of next year. In a case brought in 2014, a group called Students for Fair Admissions wants Harvard University to remove race as a factor in college admissions. Colleges and universities have used race and ethnicity as one of many factors in deciding who to accept.
The group says that Harvard's admissions policies discriminate12 against Asian students. Asians make up 24 percent of the Harvard student population.
Harvard won the case in federal court in 2019 and again in an appeals court in 2020. But legal experts say the Supreme Court is likely to have its own ruling. While the case concerns a private university, Wilcox, the Coalition for TJ lawyer, told The Associated Press that a decision by the Supreme Court could affect the TJ case. The Pacific Legal Foundation supports Students for Fair Admissions' side in that legal case.
Asra Nomani is a TJ parent who has led opposition13 to the admissions changes. She said at a press conference that the new policies are part of growing "racism14 against Asian Americans." She said many of the TJ families are recent immigrants who came to America for a better life.
"These families never could have imagined they would face such injustice15 in America," she said.
Words in This Story
diversity — n the state of having people who are different races or who have different cultures in a group or organization
advantage — n. something (such as a good position or condition) that helps to make someone or something better or more likely to succeed than others
portrait— n. a detailed16 description of something or someone
reflect — n. to show (something) : to make (something) known
apply –v. to ask for something formally, such as a job or admission to a school, usually in writing
standardized –adj. describing something that has been made the same for everyone who uses it
factor –n. something that helps produce or influence a result; a fact that influences a decision
1 ethnic | |
adj.人种的,种族的,异教徒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 ethnically | |
adv.人种上,民族上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 competitive | |
adj.竞争的,比赛的,好竞争的,有竞争力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 holistically | |
adv.holistic(整体的,全盘的)的副词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 superintendent | |
n.监督人,主管,总监;(英国)警务长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 unified | |
(unify 的过去式和过去分词); 统一的; 统一标准的; 一元化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 standardized | |
adj.标准化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 discriminate | |
v.区别,辨别,区分;有区别地对待 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 racism | |
n.民族主义;种族歧视(意识) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 detailed | |
adj.详细的,详尽的,极注意细节的,完全的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|