-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The U.S. Supreme1 Court on Thursday established limits on the federal government's power to reduce carbon emissions2 from power plants.
The ruling immediately affects President Joe Biden's plans to deal with climate change by cutting the release of carbon gases into the atmosphere. It also raises new legal questions about government agencies' power to set rules and regulations.
Scientists say greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, trap heat and cause the atmosphere to warm.
The court's six-to-three ruling restricted the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from existing coal- and gas-fueled electricity plants under the Clean Air Act anti-pollution law. The court's six conservatives were in the majority decision with the three liberals disagreeing.
With Thursday's ruling, the high court overturned a lower court decision in 2021 that had struck down former President Donald Trump's Affordable3 Clean Energy rule. That regulation, which the Biden administration has said it does not want to keep, would set limits on the EPA's power to regulate emissions from existing power plants.
The Biden administration aims to cut the nation's greenhouse gas emissions in half by the end of 2030. It says it wants to have an emissions-free power industry by 2035. Power plants produce about 30 percent of carbon dioxide released in the U.S.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for the court. He wrote that the Clean Air Act does not give the EPA the power to place limits on emissions in the way it proposed. He said Congress must speak clearly on this subject.
"A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting4 pursuant to a clear delegation5 from that representative body," he wrote.
Conservative activists6 have long supported measures to reduce agency power in what some called a "war on the administrative7 state." They want lawmakers in Congress to authorize8 action on issues of broad importance and societal impact.
In January, the conservative justices also blocked the Biden administration's vaccine9 policy for large businesses meant to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic.
In her dissent10, Justice Elena Kagan said the majority's decision takes away the power that Congress gave the agency to deal with "the most pressing environmental challenge of our time."
Kagan added that the majority has a clear goal: "Prevent agencies from doing important work, even though that is what Congress directed."
Complicated issues
The justices heard arguments in the case on February 28. That was the same day that a United Nations report warned that the effects of climate change are about to get much worse. It said the warming of the earth would likely make people sicker and hungrier in the coming years.
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat11, criticized the court's ruling. He called it "dangerously misguided and abhorrent12."
Schumer said, like the court's ruling on guns and abortions13, Thursday's decision "will cause more needless deaths - in this instance because of more pollution that will exacerbate14 the climate crisis and make our air and water less clean and safe."
Senator Kevin Cramer, a Republican, praised the decision. He said the ruling restates that "Congress never intended the federal government to regulate greenhouse gas emissions for the states."
The decision was issued on the final day of rulings for the court's current term. The day also marked the swearing-in of Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first African-American woman on the Supreme Court.
Words in This Story
regulation –n. (usually pl.) an official rule or law that says how something should be done
magnitude –n. size, extent or importance
consequence –n. importance, value
pursuant to –prep. in a way that agrees with or follows something
authorize –v. to give legal or official approval
dissent –n. to publicly disagree with an official opinion, decision, or set of beliefs
exacerbate –v. to make a situation worse than it already is
intend –v. to have something in mind as a purpose or goal
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 delegation | |
n.代表团;派遣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 activists | |
n.(政治活动的)积极分子,活动家( activist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 administrative | |
adj.行政的,管理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 authorize | |
v.授权,委任;批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 vaccine | |
n.牛痘苗,疫苗;adj.牛痘的,疫苗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 abhorrent | |
adj.可恶的,可恨的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 abortions | |
n.小产( abortion的名词复数 );小产胎儿;(计划)等中止或夭折;败育 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 exacerbate | |
v.恶化,增剧,激怒,使加剧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|