-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Mike O'Sullivan
Los Angeles
18 January 2006
Scientists who study human development have always faced a dilemma1. The need to procreate and protect our genetic3 offspring can be overridden4 in humans who sometimes act against their biological interest. Walter Goldschmidt's new book The Bridge to Humanity tries to answer the question of how humans overcame what is called the "selfish gene2."
---------------------------------------------------
Biologists know that creatures sometimes sacrifice themselves in the interest of their offspring. Anthropologist5 Walter Goldschmidt says that in the animal world, altruistic6 behavior seldom goes any further.
"Living matter is designed by some strange circumstance to want to preserve itself," he said. "And that means it may make sacrificial acts for its own offspring to have their continuity because their continuity is more important than the continuity of the person itself."
But humans can override7 the biological drive to promote their genetic heritage, a drive some biologists call the "selfish gene." People can devote themselves to pursuits with no apparent genetic payoff, from religious altruism8 to the simple pursuit of pleasure.
Mr. Goldschmidt, 92, is an emeritus9 professor of anthropology10 and psychiatry11 at UCLA. He says scientists have shed light on evolution, but have never explained how humans can rise above their biology.
"Humans, who are a product of evolution, the enigma12 is, how did we escape this domination?" he asked.
He says nature rewards behavior that promotes the well-being13 of a species. Sexual relations, for example, are pleasurable, and animals do not need to be coaxed14 into procreating.
In the same way, he says a mother gets gratification from nursing her children. Children also need the attention of a mother. He says with humans and other mammals, physical and psychological sustenance15 are essential for the development of the offspring.
"Now these things are not just whimsical wants. They're universal, not only wants, but needs," he explained.
The anthropologist says a clue to the human riddle16 is seen in the nurturing17 love of a mother, which is important for all mammals. A mother cat licks its kittens, and scientists know this promotes their neurological development. Rhesus monkeys raised without mothers are unable to develop into healthy adults.
Professor Goldschmidt believes that nurturing by mothers, which is more prolonged in humans than in other species, allows our social development. Many psychologists would agree. But he takes the argument further, saying the bond between mother and infant sparked a transformation18, promoting the social relations that allowed societies to emerge. He says the emergence19 of culture began with our ancient predecessor20, homo habilis, an early form of man that made crude tools.
"And I argue that over the whole period from when the genus first began, with homo habilis, there was a constant growth of the brain. It enabled it to think logically," he noted21.
The author believes that logical thought developed in two directions. One was through language, and the other was through tool making. He says both skills are the result of the same mental abilities, and they emerged in the context of ancient communities. He says both, in turn, stimulated22 our development.
He says the process is repeated in families, as a child interacts with, and learns from, its parents. Through thousands of generations, Professor Goldschmidt says, this has led to flexible human cultures and the dominance of our species, homo sapiens.
"The essence of humanity is the flexibility23 of behavior that we are capable of," he said. "That is to say, if it's a cold climate, we make igloos, and if it's a hot climate, we make grass huts."
Other species once achieved elementary levels of culture. But they were apparently24 less adaptable25 and have since died off, their demise26 possibly hastened by our ancestors. Our ancient cousins include Neanderthals and the pygmies who were recently discovered through fossil remains27 on the Indonesian island of Flores.
But Walter Goldschmidt says evolution is a tale of cooperation as much as a tale of competition. In his book The Bridge to Humanity, he says the role of the nurturing mother is a crucial missing link to understanding our human development.
1 dilemma | |
n.困境,进退两难的局面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 gene | |
n.遗传因子,基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 genetic | |
adj.遗传的,遗传学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 overridden | |
越控( override的过去分词 ); (以权力)否决; 优先于; 比…更重要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 anthropologist | |
n.人类学家,人类学者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 altruistic | |
adj.无私的,为他人着想的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 override | |
vt.不顾,不理睬,否决;压倒,优先于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 altruism | |
n.利他主义,不自私 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 emeritus | |
adj.名誉退休的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 anthropology | |
n.人类学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 psychiatry | |
n.精神病学,精神病疗法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 enigma | |
n.谜,谜一样的人或事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 well-being | |
n.安康,安乐,幸福 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 coaxed | |
v.哄,用好话劝说( coax的过去式和过去分词 );巧言骗取;哄劝,劝诱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 sustenance | |
n.食物,粮食;生活资料;生计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 riddle | |
n.谜,谜语,粗筛;vt.解谜,给…出谜,筛,检查,鉴定,非难,充满于;vi.出谜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 nurturing | |
养育( nurture的现在分词 ); 培育; 滋长; 助长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 transformation | |
n.变化;改造;转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 emergence | |
n.浮现,显现,出现,(植物)突出体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 predecessor | |
n.前辈,前任 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 stimulated | |
a.刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 flexibility | |
n.柔韧性,弹性,(光的)折射性,灵活性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 adaptable | |
adj.能适应的,适应性强的,可改编的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 demise | |
n.死亡;v.让渡,遗赠,转让 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|