-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Andre de Nesnera
Washington
03 November 2006
One of the key reforms under outgoing U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan was the creation of a new Human Rights Council to replace the discredited1 Human Rights Commission.
The U.N. resolution establishing the Human Rights Council last March said the new body will be responsible for promoting universal respect for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. In addition, the 47-member council will address human rights violations2 around the world.
The new Council replaced the old 53-member Human Rights Commission. Nancy Soderberg, former U.S. alternate representative to the United Nations, says that body was highly politicized.
"The old Human Rights Commission had been hijacked3 by the human rights abusers as a way of blocking any effective action - so you had Cuba, Syria, Iran - all those nations, who did not want the U.N. to shine a spotlight4 on their abuses. So, it absolutely had to go," she said.
Michael Doyle, former adviser5 to outgoing U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, agrees.
"The old Human Rights Commission had turned into a platform for rhetoric6 rather than action, rhetoric that was designed to draw lines rather than define common ground," he noted7. "There was a sense that it was a body that was no longer credible8 - too many human rights abusers had too much influence. And that was the motivation that led many people to think that we needed a new body to address the issue of human rights, which is what the Human Rights Council is about."
Experts say it is too early to tell whether the new council is better than the old commission. It has already met twice since its creation and plans another meeting before the end of the year. The old commission met only once yearly.
Donald Steinberg, U.N. expert with the International Crisis Group, says there are other positive signs.
"The membership requirements to serve on the council have been toughened up such that you have to agree that, if you are going to serve on the council, that your country will be analyzed9 for its human rights standards, and that has discouraged some of the worst human rights abusers from standing10 for election to the council," said Mr. Steinberg. "The council now meets regularly throughout the year. It has looked at its mandates11 and reformed many of them. But, again, it is very much a work in progress. It's only been around for about five or six months, and we'll see, over the future, how it responds."
Analysts12 say one of the key deficiencies of this new council is that the United Sates is not a member. It decided13 not to run for a seat on the council.
U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Mark Lagon says Washington was not a candidate, because it felt the new body did not go far enough to address the shortcomings of the old one.
"We made the decision that this council was a missed opportunity, that it was not constructed in a way that would be definitively14 better than the Commission on Human Rights, and we decided not to run in the first year," he said.
But Donald Steinberg, of the International Crisis Group, says there may be another reason why the United States decided to stay on the sidelines.
"Many people believe the United States may not have been elected because of the reaction around the world to some of the American initiatives, whether it be Iraq or Guantanamo or elsewhere," he added.
U.S. official Mark Lagon says Washington will decide what to do in the very near future.
"We need to make an assessment15 soon," added Mr. Lagon. "There will be an election that takes place next spring for the second year of the council."
Analysts say, whatever the reason for Washington's non-participation16 in the council this year, it must reverse that policy and run for election next year. They say the chances of influencing the council from within are much greater than trying to do so from the outside looking in. And, they say, without Washington's participation, the credibility of the new Human Rights Council suffers.
1 discredited | |
不足信的,不名誉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 violations | |
违反( violation的名词复数 ); 冒犯; 违反(行为、事例); 强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 hijacked | |
劫持( hijack的过去式和过去分词 ); 绑架; 拦路抢劫; 操纵(会议等,以推销自己的意图) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 spotlight | |
n.公众注意的中心,聚光灯,探照灯,视听,注意,醒目 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 credible | |
adj.可信任的,可靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 analyzed | |
v.分析( analyze的过去式和过去分词 );分解;解释;对…进行心理分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 mandates | |
托管(mandate的第三人称单数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 definitively | |
adv.决定性地,最后地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 assessment | |
n.评价;评估;对财产的估价,被估定的金额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 participation | |
n.参与,参加,分享 | |
参考例句: |
|
|