-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Dan Robinson
Washington
03 November 2006
If Democratic Party candidates win a majority in the Senate or House of Representatives in the November 7 congressional election, the party would gain control of key committees overseeing government operations.
US Capitol, Washington DC
A Democratic majority in one or both houses of Congress would mean Republicans would have to give up coveted2 chairmanships that allow the majority party to shape the congressional agenda.
With opinion polls indicating Democrats3 have a greater chance of winning control of the 435-member House of Representatives, more media attention, and Republican campaign rhetoric4, has focused on who may control key committees there than in the 100-member Senate.
If Democrats won control of the House, they would select committee chairmen, and would also vote to make Nancy Pelosi the first woman ever to be Speaker of the House.
The House International Relations Committee would likely be headed by California Congressman5 Tom Lantos, known for his fiery6 speeches on behalf of human rights, tough rhetoric toward regimes in Iran and Syria, and his strong support of Israel.
Tom Lantos (file photo)
"Israel is not facing just the terrorists Hamas and Hezbollah," said Mr. Lantos. "Those criminal groups are merely proxies7 for the real masters of terror, Syria and Iran."
In the House Armed Services Committee, Congressman Ike Skelton would likely use his chairmanship to focus greater scrutiny8 on Pentagon spending for U.S. troops and equipment, as well as spending in Iraq.
In Congress since 1976, Skelton has become one of the sharpest critics of the Bush administration's handling of Iraq.
Ike Skelton (file photo)
"Continuing violence in Iraq underscores two facts - that the administration has failed not only to bring about stability for the Iraqi people, that American intervention9 in Iraq is inhibiting10 our counter-terrorism efforts in other parts of the world, and, thirdly, the military of the U.S. is less ready today than it was when we went into Iraq," he said.
Republicans are bracing11 for the possibility American voters will make them the minority in the House, and they are aiming their campaign criticism at two Democrats who would head two of the most powerful committees on Capitol Hill.
New York's Charles Rangel, the gravel-voiced critic of administration economic and foreign policy, and four-decade veteran John Conyers of Michigan, would head the Ways and Means, and Judiciary Committees respectively.
Both have been key targets of Republican campaign advertisements and speeches delivered by President Bush in support of his party's candidates.
George W. Bush
"The person that wants to become head of the Ways and Means Committee for the Democrats said that he can't think of one tax cut that he would extend," said Mr. Bush. "That's code word for, get ready, if the Democrats take the House, your taxes are going up."
Congressman Conyers has been an irritant for President Bush on issues ranging from prewar intelligence on Iraq to the Patriot12 Act, legislation Congress approved giving the government new powers to fight terrorists.
In 2004, Conyers led Democratic calls for the resignation of Secretary of Defense13 Donald Rumsfeld over the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, involving mistreatment of Iraqi detainees by some U.S. troops.
"And, we definitely still demand the immediate14 resignation of Donald Rumsfeld," said Mr. Conyers. "There is no way that we can timidly rationalize what his responsibilities are as secretary of defense, an experienced secretary of defense, that had to have known what we were allowing to be done in these camps."
Bush political adviser15 Karl Rove has also used campaign appearances to criticize lawmakers like Conyers and others he asserts would weaken U.S. efforts to fight terrorists.
Karl Rove (file photo)
"The problem for these Democrats is that policies and votes have consequences, and their policies and their votes would make us more, not less vulnerable, and, in war, weakness invites and emboldens16 your enemies, and it is an invitation for disaster," said Mr. Rove.
A Democrat1 who may be in a position to subject government operations to the most scrutiny is Congressman Henry Waxman, who would head the House Government Reform Committee.
Frequently chiding17 Republicans for what he calls their failure to conduct proper oversight18, Waxman would use committee subpoena19 powers to probe more deeply into reported waste and fraud by U.S. contractors20 in Iraq, and alleged21 connections between White House officials and convicted former lobbyist Jack22 Abramoff, who has tainted24 both Republican and Democratic lawmakers.
One choice facing the Democrats and potential Speaker Pelosi involves the House Intelligence Committee.
That panel saw often bitter feuding25 between its Republican chairman, Peter Hoekstra, and ranking Democrat Jane Harman, a potential choice to head the committee and a critic of Bush administration handling of military tribunals to try terrorist suspects.
"We do need tough aggressive policies, but they have to be consistent with our constitution and the moral authority of the United States," she said.
However, internal party politics could prevent Harman from getting the Intelligence Committee chair.
Besides Congressmen Rangel and Conyers, a Democratic majority in the House may bring additional African American lawmakers, and other women, into positions of power.
James Clyburn of South Carolina may compete for the post of Democratic Whip, the third ranking spot behind the Speaker and the Majority Leader. Mississippi Democrat Bennie Thompson would be in line to chair the Homeland Security Committee.
As the potential head of the House Rules Committee, New York Congresswoman Louise Slaughter26 would exert control over how legislation is amended27 before consideration by the House, a process Democrats have accused Republicans of manipulating to ram23 through President Bush's priorities with minimal28 debate.
1 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 coveted | |
adj.令人垂涎的;垂涎的,梦寐以求的v.贪求,觊觎(covet的过去分词);垂涎;贪图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 fiery | |
adj.燃烧着的,火红的;暴躁的;激烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 proxies | |
n.代表权( proxy的名词复数 );(测算用的)代替物;(对代理人的)委托书;(英国国教教区献给主教等的)巡游费 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 intervention | |
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 inhibiting | |
抑制作用的,约束的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 bracing | |
adj.令人振奋的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 patriot | |
n.爱国者,爱国主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 emboldens | |
v.鼓励,使有胆量( embolden的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 chiding | |
v.责骂,责备( chide的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 subpoena | |
n.(法律)传票;v.传讯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 contractors | |
n.(建筑、监造中的)承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 jack | |
n.插座,千斤顶,男人;v.抬起,提醒,扛举;n.(Jake)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 ram | |
(random access memory)随机存取存储器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 tainted | |
adj.腐坏的;污染的;沾污的;感染的v.使变质( taint的过去式和过去分词 );使污染;败坏;被污染,腐坏,败坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 feuding | |
vi.长期不和(feud的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 slaughter | |
n.屠杀,屠宰;vt.屠杀,宰杀 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 Amended | |
adj. 修正的 动词amend的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 minimal | |
adj.尽可能少的,最小的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|