-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Dan Robinson
Washington
21 July 2006
A dispute between the U.S. Congress and the Bush administration over a plan to sell F-16 fighter aircraft to Pakistan spilled into the open Thursday during a congressional hearing on Capitol Hill. Some lawmakers say they were not properly consulted on key aspects of the plan, and raised concerns ranging from technology proliferation to political stability and human rights in Pakistan.
--------
President Bush authorized1 the sale of F-16 aircraft to Pakistan in 2005, reversing a policy in effect for at least 15 years against such transfers because of nuclear concerns.
India has reiterated2 its opposition3, describing the sale as not conducive4 to improving ties between India and Pakistan.
Lawmakers are furious with what they see as inadequate5 State Department consultation6 with Congress.
House International Relations Committee Chairman Henry Hyde accuses the State Department of ignoring Congress' role and violating understandings on congressional notification regarding arms sales. "It represents a deliberate and we believe, wholly inappropriate maneuver7 by the State Department to diminish the Congress' lawful8 oversight9 of arms sales," he said.
Pakistan would receive 18 F-16 jets under the five-billion dollar deal, with an option to purchase 18 more.
But primary among lawmaker's concerns is their belief that the Pakistani government cannot ensure technology will not fall into the hands of China or others.
Senior committee Democrat10 Tom Lantos agrees with administration justifications11 that the sale will help Pakistan meet legitimate12 security needs, but underlines his concern. "Pakistani export controls are so lax as to have allowed A.Q. Khan to provide the crown jewels of Pakistan's nuclear weapons development program to states such as North Korea and Iran. The administration's plan is inadequate to safeguard U.S. technology properly and to protect U.S. national security against espionage13 and compromise in Pakistan," he said.
The hearing was scheduled for last week but postponed14 amid often tense behind-the-scenes negotiations15 with the State Department. A similar Senate hearing was also postponed.
Lawmakers accused the State Department of arrogance16 in how it handled notification, with Lantos alleging17 what he called a calculated attempt to prevent Congress from trying to alter the current security plan for the planes.
John Hillen, assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs denies that, and defends the security plan. "The administration very carefully considered the potential risks of diversion of U.S. technology and equipment and we are taking appropriate steps to minimize those risks. Furthermore, the government of Pakistan, including the Pakistan Air Force has been extremely cooperative in responding to our concerns on the security of aircraft and technology," he said.
The State Department position that it did nothing wrong in consulting with Congress sparked this angry exchange between Hillen and Democratic Congressman18 Brad Sherman:
HILLEN: "I have taken this process quite seriously as a custodian19 of the public trust."
SHERMAN: "Your job is to disenfranchise our constituents20 and to make sure that nothing that comes from Congress affects this deal in any way and you've done it spectacularly well."
Republican Dan Burton shares the worries about security, but says Pakistan's role in the war on terrorism justifies21 the sale of F-16s. "We should show some support for Pakistan with this sale," he said.
Another Republican, Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, disagrees. "The F-16 is an offensive weapons system. It can drop nuclear weapons. And it is designed to make war on countries that have sophisticated air forces, not the Taleban, not radical22 Islam," he said.
Assistant Secretary Hillen said the F-16s for Pakistan will not be capable of carrying nuclear weapons, although he acknowledged they could be modified.
In a statement accompanying notification to Congress, the Pentagon said the Pakistani purchase would "not significantly reduce India's quantitative23 or qualitative24 military advantage" and that it would neither affect the regional balance of power nor introduce a new technology in the region.
1 authorized | |
a.委任的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 reiterated | |
反复地说,重申( reiterate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 conducive | |
adj.有益的,有助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 inadequate | |
adj.(for,to)不充足的,不适当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 consultation | |
n.咨询;商量;商议;会议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 maneuver | |
n.策略[pl.]演习;v.(巧妙)控制;用策略 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 justifications | |
正当的理由,辩解的理由( justification的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 espionage | |
n.间谍行为,谍报活动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 postponed | |
vt.& vi.延期,缓办,(使)延迟vt.把…放在次要地位;[语]把…放在后面(或句尾)vi.(疟疾等)延缓发作(或复发) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 arrogance | |
n.傲慢,自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 alleging | |
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 custodian | |
n.保管人,监护人;公共建筑看守 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 constituents | |
n.选民( constituent的名词复数 );成分;构成部分;要素 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 justifies | |
证明…有理( justify的第三人称单数 ); 为…辩护; 对…作出解释; 为…辩解(或辩护) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 quantitative | |
adj.数量的,定量的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 qualitative | |
adj.性质上的,质的,定性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|