-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Dan Robinson
Capitol Hill
06 March 2007
Congress is stepping up investigations2 into suggestions that political motivations were behind the Bush administration's dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys. VOA's Dan Robinson reports, the controversy3 over the firings could have significant repercussions4.
U.S. attorneys are appointed to head local federal prosecutors5' offices across the United States, to represent the U.S. government in criminal and civil cases, and coordinate6 law enforcement activities.
While they are political appointees nominated by and serving at the pleasure of the president, they are protective of their independence from partisan7 political pressures.
But the removal of so many at the mid-point of a presidential administration is considered highly unusual.
And the involvement of two Republican lawmakers in the controversy over the firing of the eight prosecutors, as well as denials by the U.S. Justice Department that politics played any role, combine to create another Washington political drama.
David Iglesias, dismissed as a U.S. Attorney in New Mexico, described a phone call he received before last year's mid-term congressional elections from Republican Senator Pete Domenici seeking information about the status of indictments8 in a corruption9 investigation1 involving Democrats10 in the state.
Iglesias had this exchange with Democratic Senator Charles Schumer:
SCHUMER: "And so, is it fair to say that you felt pressured to hurry subsequent cases and prosecutions12 as a result of the call?"
IGLESIAS: "Yes, sir, I did. I felt leaned on. I felt pressured to get these matters moving."
Iglesias adds that he was dismissed about six weeks later, although he makes no direct allegations of a connection between his firing and the phone call from the Republican senator.
Senator Domenici and Congresswoman Heather Wilson, a New Mexico Republican who also contacted Iglesias, deny their contacts were aimed at exerting political pressure.
Some of the attorneys also described pressure from the Department of Justice after some of them were quoted in media reports that appeared after Congress began to investigate the firings.
John McKay was U.S. attorney in Seattle until he was removed last December:
"[The message was] that any work with the Congress or testimony13 before the Congress would be seen as an escalation14 by the Department of Justice, and that they would respond accordingly," said Mr. McKay.
In a carefully worded joint15 statement, the attorneys say they regret the circumstances under which they appeared before lawmakers, while reiterating16 they received little or no information from the Justice Department about the reasons for their dismissal.
Carol Lam is a former U.S. attorney from San Diego involved in the prosecution11 on corruption charges of a former Republican congressman17:
"This hearing is not a forum18 to engage in speculation19, and we decline to speculate about the reasons," she said. "We have every confidence that the excellent career attorneys in our offices will continue to serve as aggressive, independent advocates of the best interests of the people of the United States."
The Bush administration says the dismissals were due to dissatisfaction with what it calls policy decisions the U.S. attorneys made. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez has strongly denied he would remove anyone for political reasons.
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Pat Leahy is not persuaded:
"I really believe they threaten to undermine the effectiveness and professionalism of U.S. attorney's offices around the country," he said.
Republican Senator Arlen Spector cautioned that Congress would view seriously any evidence that attorneys were removed for political reasons:
"We [in Congress] have a weighty responsibility so that we do not tamper20 with the established right of the president to replace U.S. attorneys, but deal with the question of whether they are being replaced because they are doing a job which is politically sensitive, or going after corruption, or being replaced for some improper21 motive," he noted22.
Congressional Democrats are also alleging23 that the Bush administration is using a little-noticed provision in the USA Patriot24 Act, the anti-terror law renewed by Congress, to appoint political allies to U.S. attorney posts, and get around the Senate confirmation25 process
Depending on additional information emerging in congressional inquiries26, contacts between lawmakers and U.S. attorneys could become the latest ethics27 issue to emerge in Congress.
1 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 repercussions | |
n.后果,反响( repercussion的名词复数 );余波 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 prosecutors | |
检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 coordinate | |
adj.同等的,协调的;n.同等者;vt.协作,协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 indictments | |
n.(制度、社会等的)衰败迹象( indictment的名词复数 );刑事起诉书;公诉书;控告 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 prosecution | |
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 prosecutions | |
起诉( prosecution的名词复数 ); 原告; 实施; 从事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 escalation | |
n.扩大,增加 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 reiterating | |
反复地说,重申( reiterate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 forum | |
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 speculation | |
n.思索,沉思;猜测;投机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 tamper | |
v.干预,玩弄,贿赂,窜改,削弱,损害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 improper | |
adj.不适当的,不合适的,不正确的,不合礼仪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 alleging | |
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 patriot | |
n.爱国者,爱国主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 inquiries | |
n.调查( inquiry的名词复数 );疑问;探究;打听 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|