-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Gary Thomas
Washington
13 April 2007
Iranian state-run Al-Alam television image of detained British sailors, 30 Mar1. 2007
Iran is embroiled2 in controversy3 with the West over issues ranging from Iran's nuclear ambitions to its bid to extend its influence in Iraq and the Middle East. Yet, even at such a sensitive time, Iran detained 15 British sailors who were on patrol in the Persian Gulf4 and held them for nearly two weeks. Britain said its personnel had been in Iraqi waters, not in Iranian waters as Tehran maintains. VOA correspondent Gary Thomas looks at some of the questions surrounding the incident and the possible ramifications5.
The reasons for the capture of the British naval6 personnel in late March, and the subsequent fallout from it, may lie across Iran's western border in Iraq, where analysts8 say Iran is seeking to extend its influence, and the U.S. is trying to halt it.
The United States says Iran is training Iraqi insurgents9 and arming them with deadly roadside bombs to attack U.S. forces. Iran denies the charge, dismissing it as propaganda.
President Bush has pledged to halt any cross-border activity. "When we find the networks that are enabling these weapons to end up in Iraq, we will deal with them," said the president. "If we find agents who are moving these devices into Iraq, we will deal with them."
Paul Pillar
So in January, U.S. forces detained five Iranians in the northern city of Irbil. In a separate incident, an Iranian diplomat10 was abducted11 by unknown Iraqi gunmen. Former CIA analyst7 Paul Piller explains what followed.
"So the Iranians felt like they were getting shoved around with that earlier episode in Iraq, two episodes, really, and they wanted to do some shoving back," explained Piller. "It would have been riskier12 to shove directly back against the United States. So the slightly softer target, if you will, the 'squishier' target but one with whom the message would still be sent [that] 'we're not going to be shoved around,' was the British servicemen."
Karim Sadjadpour
No one outside Tehran's inner ruling circle knows for certain who ordered the action. Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran analyst with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, offers a possible scenario13. “I think that at the senior levels in Tehran there's ... a sense of schizophrenia," says Sadjadpour, "that on the one hand, 'we don't want confrontation14, we're weary of political and economic isolation,' but on the other hand, 'we're not simply going to lie down when you turn up the heat.'"
Former National Security Council staffer Gary Sick says the United States and Iran have similar interests in a stable Iraq, but that as Iraq's neighbor, Iran will not back off from its bid to exert influence there.
Gary Sick
"What's curious is that the United States and Iran have very close to the same interests in Iraq in the broad sense," says Sick, who now teaches at Columbia University in New York.
"But the difference is that Iran is there, it's on the [Iraqi] border. It's fought a war with Iraq. And Iran is going to stay there. We're going to go away. They will still be there 100 years from now," he continued, "and they have to think about what that's going to mean for their long-term interests. At the moment, I think they feel they're doing pretty well."
A multinational15 conference on stabilizing16 Iraq was held in March that included both U.S. and Iranian officials. Another meeting, this time with higher-ranking diplomats17, is in the works.
Paul Pillar says the meeting next month in Egypt was another factor in the quick end to the British-Iranian standoff. "I speculate that part of the thinking in Tehran which led to the release after the two weeks of captivity18 was not wanting to complicate19 particularly the Iraq conference, which is going to address some subjects that, despite the rhetoric20 on both sides, both the United States and Iran share many interests, particularly the basic interest of not wanting to have unending and escalating21 disorder22 in Iraq. And, of course, for the Iranians," he added, "it's right next door."
The Iranian diplomat who was captured by unknown Iraqi gunmen gained his freedom right before Iran released the British naval personnel. Britain says there is no connection. Negotiations23 also began to allow Iranian envoys24 to visit the Iranians in U.S. custody25.
Yet, mutual26 suspicions persist. Iran is threatening to boycott27 the next Iraq conference unless the five Iranians detained by U.S. forces are released. Iran says they are diplomats. American officials believe they are linked to Iraqi insurgents.
1 mar | |
vt.破坏,毁坏,弄糟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 embroiled | |
adj.卷入的;纠缠不清的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 ramifications | |
n.结果,后果( ramification的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 naval | |
adj.海军的,军舰的,船的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 insurgents | |
n.起义,暴动,造反( insurgent的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 diplomat | |
n.外交官,外交家;能交际的人,圆滑的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 abducted | |
劫持,诱拐( abduct的过去式和过去分词 ); 使(肢体等)外展 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 riskier | |
冒险的,危险的( risky的比较级 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 confrontation | |
n.对抗,对峙,冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 multinational | |
adj.多国的,多种国籍的;n.多国籍公司,跨国公司 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 stabilizing | |
n.稳定化处理[退火]v.(使)稳定, (使)稳固( stabilize的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 diplomats | |
n.外交官( diplomat的名词复数 );有手腕的人,善于交际的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 captivity | |
n.囚禁;被俘;束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 complicate | |
vt.使复杂化,使混乱,使难懂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 escalating | |
v.(使)逐步升级( escalate的现在分词 );(使)逐步扩大;(使)更高;(使)更大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 envoys | |
使节( envoy的名词复数 ); 公使; 谈判代表; 使节身份 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 custody | |
n.监护,照看,羁押,拘留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 mutual | |
adj.相互的,彼此的;共同的,共有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 boycott | |
n./v.(联合)抵制,拒绝参与 | |
参考例句: |
|
|